bijouxGBmGG BOOKMOBI PYXiYyZ[\]^_` a b  c d )e9fIgYhiiyjklmnopqr st)u9vIw Yx!iy"yz#{$|%}&~'(ـ)*+ ,-).9/I0Y1i2y34567ɏ8ِ9:; <=)>9?I@YAiByCDEFGɟH٠IJK LM)N9OIPYQiRySTUVWɰXٱYZ[ \])^9_I`Yaibycdefghijk lm)n9oIpYqirystuvwxyz{ |})~9IYiy  ) 9 I Y i y  ) 9 I Y i y      * : J Z j z         * : J Z j z     ! " # $ % *& :' J( Z) j* z+ , - . / 0 1 2 3 45*6:7J8Z9j:z;<=>?@ABC DE*F:GJHZIjJzKLMNOPQRS TU*V:WJXZYjZz[\]^_`a b c  d e *f:gJhZijjzklmnopqrs tu*v:wJx Zy![m"[p#1$5%:&>H'B|()*+,0-./0 1\2`3'|4+5М67x8?x9C:G;0<d=>?!@ABCрDմE4FhGHI}8JlKFLK,MO`N LO P #Q 'R ,S! T!0U!dV"W"X"0Y"dZ"ۘ[#\$x]$|L^$_$`$a$b$Pc%dd%ie%mHf%q|g&8h&<4i&@hj' 8k'll'm'n'o'!<p'%pq'r's't'<u(֜v(w) x)@y)tz)¨{)|*}*H~*|+p,7$,;X,?,C,G-T---.D//(/\/0i0m0r(0v\0z0~01^t1b1f1k2?2CL3@3t33H4Ȱ45`6=>A>F>JL>N>R?.@?2t??? ?@@t@ѤAA ATAȈBBCRCVC[ D)8DD4DhEFpFtGJGNH+HܠHHH<HpHI0IdIIIJJPKXXK\K`L2tL6L:L?LCDLGxLM4NNN(OfOjOoP3|P7P; P@ PDL PH Q  Q%Q)HQ-|QQ8RST\TaU4`U8V8VlV(WW0XXX( Yo!Ys"Z6#Z:H$Z>|%[&['[H(\)\P*\+\,\-\ .\T/\҈0\ּ1]2](3]\4]5]6]7^88^l9^:_i4;_mh<_q=_u>_z?_~8@_lA_B`KC`OD`T,E`X`F`\G``H`dI`i0J`mdKa<@La@tMaDNbObPbQbRc@SctTcUcVcWcDXdvYdzZd[d4\dh]d^d_eV`e[0afbfcfdfegfhghhiiiimjir$kivXljHmjM(nk$okpkPqkلrl sl@tmDumxvnRtwnVxo@yotzod{o|p}qW~q[r.rr sxt{u%u)utuvv wwHw|xx,x`xxxx0xdyd\yhzzz4zz{Ō|bT}/p}3~~ ~4~,~`~,`^48<#D'x+hP]a4htǨXv|z~XD\xd$XŤ @tndr+<pV/ {dNR-14w{F\JNRW,[`lm`quy~0I M R0 Vd Z ^1 spBy}KOdp !P"e#-@$1t%&'(۠)*t+0,( -,T.0/0 123|45Z6^7c 889=:AH;E|<I=M>R?&@*8A.lB CqDE$FG8HlIJKL<MpNOP QR8SPTTUYV+W0X4<Y8pZ[ 8\l]^4_h`aLbɀcʹde fwg{LhiJjO,kS`l&`m*n.o2p70q;dr?sCttuávåHwé|xíyñză8{,|1}58~9l=AFJ<"',+` H|Ȍɞɣ(ɧ\ɫɯɳʇʋ8ʏlfPjnrw {T˃ˇˌ$ːXgl pTtx|́$̅XPTDXx\`eiHm|>BGKH 4h8l <pLlΠ<ҬҰҴҹ$ҽXӑxӕәӞӢHw{DxԃZx^bg$((\0d(\ܐةح8رlصعؾ<pʤ٥٩٭ٲ(ٶ\w{8lڃڇ@dDH M Q4 Uh Y ]bf8jl:>BG04 h 8l, `!"#$%0&ߝ\'i(m)q*v$+zX,~-@.E,/I`0M1Q2U3Dp4H5L6Q 7@8D9I(:M\;Q<U=Y>^,?V4@ZhA^BbCgDk8EolFsGwH+I/JհKdL$M(NO8PlQנRST踄U輸VW XTY͈ZѼ[\$]X^_`aLbɀcʹdefPgބhij꺄k꾸lm nToψpPq륄r멸st uPv싄w쏸xy zT{절|줼}~$X~,`틔`,d`hlpu0yd}4ha eTimqv$GKl#'<+p/38  0 dPLP(\Ґ,`<pߤ @(\lq0udy}X\`049 =@AtEINRDVxZKOPSW[0@4t8<AEDIxMQV6h:>CG8Kl$P(,05 9T=059D Dx\,`Ք8l< \   ` 0duy}$X[`d<hplGdKOT X4!,"1 #$ % Ӏ& ' p( L`) P* (,+ ,`, 0- 4. 8/01,2"`3&45ʤ6l78_9d:8d;<< =T>?"@hAxBvCBDFEKF$GXHIJlKLMݔNOP0QdRSTUPVWXYZ[D\@]t^_`ab4chdefgPhijk lTmnop$qXrstDuxvwx \y!Yz!]{!b|!f<}!jp~!n!r"J,"N`"R"V"Z#)#-<#1p#5#9$ $$($\$$$($\$%%d&k&o&t&xL&|&'NX'R'V'Z'_('c\'g'k'o't,'x`'|''(U(Z(^4)2)70);d)?)**++ +@+t+++,,,D--8-l-.p<.tp.x.|. /[@/_t/c/g/l/pD/tx/x0.02D06x0:0>0C0GH0K|0O0S1.1217$222 2L22222#P2'2+2/24 28T2<2@2D2I$2MX3 484l444"4&<5<5p555# 5'@6 666H7,7 `777707!d7%88  8"T 9d 9 9 99 49$h9(9,91958::#:(:,H:0|:4:8:=;';,;0<;4p ;8!<"<"#<&L$<*%=#t&=''=+(>)> *> D+>,> -?l\.?p/?t0@h1@#2@ø3Aj4B@5Bt6B7B˴8B9B:C;C<C,=C`>DN?DS @E @AE tBECFDFEF$FFXGFHFIFJF(KF\LGpMGNGOG PG@QHRH8SHlTHUHVHWH<XHpYHZH[H \I]JhT^Jl_Jp`JtaK]bKacKf,dKj`eLCfLGgM"hM'$iM+XjM/kM3lM7mM<(nN%oN*pN.<qN2prN6sN:tN? uOvO4wO!hxO%yO)zOT{O|O}O~P$PXPۜPPP8PlPPQӔQQQ0QdQR|RǰRRRLR؀RܴSSDSxS¬SSSHT TTTTTT$UxUUUUHU|UUUULV`VVVV0VdVVVWvWzW,W`WWWXhXlYHYLPYPYTYXY] YaTZ9TZ=ZAZEZJ$[[[[([ڐ[[\\<]1<]5p]9]=^)h^-_L__!_%_*_.P_2_6`!`%`*,`.``2a a$a)a-<abbbcdNLdRdVe-e2e6Pe:e>eBf8f"lf&f*f/f3<g `gggg@gtghhh<hpi i i iL i jjkf|ll"l'llllmmm(nTnnooo o@ pk !po@"pst#qG$qK%qP &r($'r,X(r0)s*s+s <,s-s.ti/u70u;1u@02v3vX4v5v6w(7w\8w̐9w:xD;xx<yox=ys>yw?zRp@zVAzZB{0C{4D{9(E{=\F|G|(H|\I|J|K|L}M} N~hO~P0QZPRFSJTOUSLVWW[X_YdZhP[6x\:]>^D_x`abcd$eXf(g\hijk lTmgPnkoopsq>trBsFt\uvw x%,y)`z-{1|5}X~  (H|PtDx`dP;x?C,`8ll|p= \,`Ҕ @|4SX,\``d7;8?ll T`rvzNPRVZ$L=A݈qpuy~ W`[_ch0(,L DxdnrAEDIx4ѬH<B<FpJ0d04dѬS@tD H | T  [_X,mr$<pDDV8@ t!"#Ÿ$%kl& ' (`)U|*Y+,-,.>/012 83H4|56¡T7¥8©9w:{;À<ÄH=È|>Y ?]T@!lABC$DƕE]FaHG0tH4I8JKL4MhNOPQ,R`SlT˃U'DV+xWX<YzZ~[̓\͇D]\d^`_9`=a(b\cde!f\ghi؀jܴklҺtmҾnәtoӝpӡqrrvs{tHuv w%x)Dy-xz1{5|:}>H~B|FJ$ (@,t00 dݰ٥٪ٮ4ٲhڧ ګ@گtۄۈHی|ېbg<@DI H|8ߜߡ~$XYL]a=4AhEې,`Ƭ咬H|姰uz KPT804 @tMQ*`.26;0?dCG #@'tLdӘkp(t\9|LL~|OT*.3$7X;?lDx<uch0< @4 Dh H L 8 0 d    @ d   X 3 7P |       T     P   t !x "} #V $Z %^ &c( 'g\ (k )9x *= +A ,F -JH .( /\ 0x 1̬ 2 3 4 5  6 $ 7 8 9 $ :  ; P < = > ? 0 @y A} Bj CD DH E F G H, I` J K Lɠ M N OP P Q R S T@ UD V W XP YP Z74 [d \n ] ^L _. `x ae b< c d:H e fm g, ht i j k p` l t m!KT n!O o!S p! q" r"4 s" t"0 u"d v" w# x$ y%: z%>H {%۰ |% }% ~& & &, &` & 'k 'o 't (> ) 8 )l ) )< )p *8 *l +lX +p ,G - - -" - .ƨ . . / /@ 0yh 0} 0 0 08 0l 1f 2@@ 28 3< 3p 4RP 4V 4Z 5)L 5- 51 6 6 6 6L 6 6 6 7t 7 7 8 8L 8 9d0 9hd :>8 :Bl :F ; ; ;D ;x ; ; ; < h ?Z ?^< @8 A\ A A A A, A` A< Ap A B BШ B C Dk Dp0 Dtd Dx ED$ E( F F G GT Hg` I(P I, I0 J P Jތ J J K K@ Ll Mt NK NO NS O( O, O1 O PH Pl P !MOBIjd4#8#R   EXTHD,8 @AbijouxMORl DoclD: 1451843

..I ""I~' .e:r (, l, ~ ~.-!t. . . ...I'·J 1
,.ifc: LJ COliH'HIAl


:"J , .... '-: .......• . D, .u

J._.......... - ._' ........~._.._.:- ..-.-...-••_ ,,-- .--..:...-----._....:....-----.

,,0#.-......_-_._.}_------~__\l~~UnNG AND R~C~RD SHEET .


UBJI:CT: (Optional) 6, .' (_..

... I __.....- _.-_.. _.-.-. .-......-..-.-.._--------_.


;(

FROM: Howa r d J. Os--" .".'r===:\--" .--_.-'-".._~~...-.. ....- .,. - EXTENSION NO.b'orn (


·Director of
SCCUl'i
t~)

0f--.

I

I,
_
...
-.

I _

DATE

_-r---~

16 May 1973'

\TO: (Office, delignolion,((.10m number, and building)

\

1. Executive Secretary, CIA Management Cornmitl.e..e....-. 2.

. i _._iJ. ------_.

J I

.-_
...
-
DATE OfFICER'S COMMENTS (Number eachcomment to .how ftom whom
INITIALS to whom. DrawQ line across column ofter -ecch comment}
~EaIVED fORWARDED

C'P!'"lI n~~5 {jtH:u U~·~... I ,"_00 f--,


"
I

4.
J (b)(1)
"5. (b)(3)
; (b)(5)j
..J
(b)(6)

! 6.l 0
,
7. APPROVE))' FOR RELEASEDATE: JUN 2007

8." . ..
9.,
10.


11

00001:


12.

i
13.

,
,.

,; 14.

, . 15.
~1"
I
~\
\' o U~ClASSIHED

..

MORl DoclD: l45l843
,'.

MEMORANDUM FOR: SUBJECT

Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee

"Family Jewels"
16 May 1973

1. The purpose of this memorandum is to forward for your personal review summaries of activities conducted either by or under the sponsorship of the Office of Security in the past which in my opinion conflict with the provisions of the National Security Act
of 1947.

2. These activities cover 'the period from March 1959 to date and represent as accurate a record

as is .avai LabLe in our files. Those activities which,took place prior to the date of my appointment as Director of Security on 1 ~uly 1964 have been developed to a certain extent through the recollection of the senior people in this Office who were involved or who had knowledge of the activities at the ~irne they occurred. . 3. I have gone back to March 1959 because I believe that the activities occurring since that time st'ill have a viable "flap potential" in that many of the people involved, both Agency and non-Agency are still alive and through their knOWledge of the activity represent a possible potential threat or embarrassment to the Agency. I would be glad to provide clarification or an explanation of any of these activities if desired. You have my assurance that unless otherwise stated each of these activities was approved by higher authority--the

'00002

r..'

-----


MORl DoclD: l45l843
."

Director of Central Intelligence, the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, the Executive DirectorComptroller, or the Deputy Director for Support.

Attachments

"00003_.

.

I

I

..

.,

-..~ -... _-_._ _.-\ .
I


';..'
.s r,
00004
(

Attachment A "FAMILY JEWELS"
1.
2.

Johnny Roselli -The use of a member of the Mafia in an attempt to assassinate Fidel Castro. 3. Project MOCKINGBIRD -- During the period from 12 March 1963 to 15 June 1963, this Office installed telephone taps on two l\Tashingtonbased newsmen who were suspected of disclosing classified information obtained from a variety of governmental and congressional sources. 4. Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenko -A KGB defector who from the peri"6<t 13 August 1965 to 27 October 1967 was confined in a specially constructed "jail"

atr

I He

was literally confined in acell oenIllU oars with nothing but a cot in it

for this period.

5.

Various Surveillance and Support Activities These are briefly summarized and range from the surveillance of newsmen to the provision of specialized support of local police officials in the Metropolitan area. I believe that each one is 'self-explanatory and, therefore, no further comment is needed here. . 6. Equipment Support to Local Police -- Attached is iist provided me by ~he Director of Logistics (he will simply report these items in his a

report) which we have provided local police in the Metropolitan D. C. area over the past four or five years on indefinite loan. During the period when the Agency's installations in this area appeared to be a target of dissident elements


Sf ET E! S 01JlY

____·~O~0005

__I

-~------------.


a conscious decision was made by the Agency to utilize the services of local police to· repel invaders in case of riot or dissension as opposed to utilization of our GSA guards, who

are not trained in this type of activity. Thisequipment has been issued over the years to local police, principally Fairfax and Arlington County Police Departments. I do not believe that this is totally illegal under the provisions of the National Security Act of 1947, but I am including it since I am sure that it would be considered as such in light of the recent congressional fuss over our police training activities.

7. Audio Countermeasures Support to the United States "Secret Service

8. Test of Specialized Equipment in Miami Immediately Prior to the Political Convention There

00006
2
"..
MORl DoclD: 1451843
'-'
...

,.~ ••; r It! n' t IF MI •


;;;~ ~'<, ....

..~.-,,/'.~ '.'

"./' ."
/~ .:,......
.
~
..
:~
:;

':"", ::.

00007

- •• ~-". -."-.-.::-:.::, ._. _0 ••• ".·., • .: •• _ _._
MORl DoclD: l45l843
00008

SEC T t~£S ~~t~ --......-----~-----_.

_,


MORl DoclD: l45l843
..
I '.' I .... ~;,.{

-


00009
I.

II

'117 H; 7nn mIi.,r WSPS'E' P Ii'5nusn 1 i_ N"l!; ., HU ; 5

! ,,, .. ,
... .. "~'~"'a0 .: \

..:.;~~\;'. .' 'i"¥"

;ii.(,;-r'.

0001.0

3
~~~---_._-_.-_._._ .._._._.....-
-...'..- .... "
">.
r:
.' ~'
..: .'
000:11.
","
~'.,

..
:
[

.......
.
.. .._.;; 1I _ __
" .,.:. ~':.. .~.*G.ki:;;4S¥¥4g,,;n;y,IQM.;;:MlitU~~S4((JI U_I!tWli~~··f"t.r'~.o+·.~
.MORI DocID: 1451843
l
I J' .... l' ....
SUBJECT: Johnny Roselli '

1. In August 1960, Mr. Richard M.. Bissell approached Colonel Sheffield Edwards to determine if the Office of Security had assets that may as~ist in a sensitive mission requiring gangster-type action. The mission target was Fidel Castro.

2. Because o~ its extreme sensitivity, only a small group' was made privy to the project. The DCI wasbriefed and gave his approval. Colonel J. C. Kin~,

Chief, WH Division, was briefed, but all details were deliberately concealed from any of the JMWAVE officials. Certain TSD and Communications personnel participated in the initial planning stages, but were not witting of the purpose of the mission. 3. Robert A. Maheu, a cleared source of the Office of Sec~rity, ,was contacted, briefed generally on the project, and requested to ascert~in i£be could develop an entree into the gangster elements as the first step toward accomplishing the desired goal.

4. Mr. Maheu advised that he had met one JohnnyRoselli on several,oc~asionswhile visiting Las Vegas.

He only knew him casually through clients, but was given to understand that he was a high-ranking member of the "syndicat:e" and controlled all of the ice-making machines on the Strip. Maheu reasoned that, if Roselli was in fact a member of the clan, he undoubtedly had connections leading into the Cuban gambling interests., . 5., Maheu was asked to approach Roselli, who knew Maheu as a personal relations executive handling domestic and foreign accounts, and tell him that he had recently been retained by a client who represented several international business £irms which were suffering heavy financial losses in Cuba as a result of Castro's action. They were convinced that Castro's removal was the answer to their

MORl DocID: 1451843
problem and were willing to pay

a price of $150,000 for its successful accomplishment. It was to be made clear to Roselli that the United States Government was not, and should not, become aware of this operation. 6. The pitch was made to Roselli on 14 September 1960 at the Hilton Plaza Hotel, New York City. Mr. James O'Connell, Office of Security, was present during this. meeting and was identified to Roselli as an employee of Maheu. O'Connell actively served as Roselli's contact until May ~962 at which time he phased out due to an overseas assignment. His initia1 reaction was to avoid getting involved, but through Maheu's persuasion, he agreed to introduce him to a friend, Sam Gold, who knew the "Cuban crowd." Roselli made it clear he did not want any money for his part and believed Sam would feel the same way. Neither of these individuals were ever paid out of Agency funds.

7. During the week of, 25 September, Maheu was introduced to Sam who was staying at the Fontainebleau

Hotel, Miami Beach. It was several weeks 'after h:i;smeeting with Sam and Joe"who was identified to him as a courier operating between Havana and Miami, that he saw photographs of both of these individuals in the Sunday .supplemental, "Parade." They were identified as Mama Salvatore~Giancani and Santos Trafficant, respectively. Both were on the list'of the Attorney General's ten mostwanted men. The former was described as the Chicago

chieftain of the Cosa Nostra and successor to Al Capone, and the latter,' the Ces a Nostra boss of Cuban opei-a.ti ons . Maheu called this office immediately upon ascertaining this information. . . 8. In discussing the possible methods of accomplishing this mission, Sam suggested that they not resort to firearms but, if he could be furnished some type of potent pill, that could be placed in Castro's food

or drink, it would be a much more effective operation.Sam indicated that he had a prospective nominee in the person of Juan Orta , a Cuban official who had been receiving kick-back payments from the gambling interests, access to Castro, and was in a financial bind. who still had

2

SEGI..: TEyr ,ONLY

000:1.3

9. TSD was requested to produce six pills of high lethal content.

10. Joe delivered the pills to Orta.
several weeks of reported attempts,
OJ;ta·appar~l.1tly
Aftergot

cold feet and asked out of the assignment. He suggested another candidate who made several attempts without success. 11. Joe then indicated that Dr. Anthony Verona, one of the pr LncLpaL officers in the Cuban Exile Junta, had become disaffected with the apparent ineffectual progress of the Junta and was willing to handle the mission through his own resources. 12. He asked, asa prirequisite·to.the deal, that he be given $10,000 for organizational expenses and requested $1,000 worth of communications equipment.

13. Dr. Verona's potential was never fUlly as the project was canceled shortly after the

exploited, Bay of Pigs episode. was 'vithdrawn, and the Verona was advised that the offer pLll s were. retrieved.

14. Of significant interest was an incidentwhich involved a request levied by Sam upon Maheu.
-:' . . ,. At t he height of the project negotiations, Sam expressed concern about his girl£riend, Phyllis McGuire, who he learned was getting much attention from booked at a Las Vegas night club. Sam asked Maheurt;o put a bug in Rowan t s :rbomto determine the extent of his intimacy with Miss McGuire•. The technician involved in the assignment was discovered in the process, arrested, and taken to the Sheriff's office for questioning. He called Maheu and informed him that he hadmade
in the'presence of the Sheriff's personnel ..
Subsequently, the Department of Justice
Dan Rowan while both were

been detained by the police. This call was announced its intention to prosecute Maheu along

3

s£cJ16 . 00014
}YES ONLY

with the technician. On 7 February 1962~. the Director of Security briefed the Attorney General, Robert Kennedy, on the circumstances leading up to Maheu's involvement in thelviretap. At our request, prosecution was

dropped. .

15. In May 1962, Mr. William Harvey took overas Case Officer, and it is not known by this office whether Roselli was used operationally from that point on. 16. It was subsequently learned from the FBI that Roselli had been convicted on six counts involving illegal entry into t.he United States. Our records do not reflect the date of conviction, but it is believed to have been s9metime during November 1967. 17. On'2 December i968, Roselli, along with four other individuals, was convicted of conspiracy to cheat members of the Friars Club of $400,~OO in· a.rigged gin rl!-mmy g<;l.me. 18. Mr. Harvey reported to t.he Office of Security of his contacts with Roselli during November and December
1967 and January 1968. It was his belief that Johnny would not seek out the Agency for assistance in the deporta": tion proceedings unless he actually faced deportation. Roselli expressed confidence that he would win an appeal. 19. On 17 November 1970, Maheu called James O'Connell, Roselli's first Case Officer, to advise that Maheu's attorney, Ed Morgan, had received a call fromThomas Waddin, Roselli's lawyer, who stated that all.

avenues of appeal had been exhausted, and his client faces deportation. Waddin indicated ~hat, if someone did not intercede on Roselli's behalf, he would make a cOmplete expose of his activities with the Agency. 20. On 18 November 1970, Mr. Helms was briefed on the latest development in this case, and it was decided that the Agency would not in any way assist Roselli. Maheu was sp a?vised of the Agency's position, and he was in a

now
4 00015

'.' ,.

complete agreement with our stand. He further adVised that he was not concerned about any publicity as it affected him personally should Roselli decide to tell all. 21. Subsequently, Roselli or someone on his behalf furnished Jack Anderson details of the operation. Attached are two Anderson columns dealing with" this matter.

22. The last known residence of Roselli was theFederal Penitentiary in Seattle, Washington.
Attachments

00016

5

SE T i·f.rS ONLY


.., ""

'"pm TRUW 'q un tt tlI(' , 1% 't $1$ S'

.~-~-~ -,..':~'.,"

;"..: -" ..,-,"
....... :jt;
...,

{


~ '."

~-----------_.

MORl DoclD: 1451843
,',
Tlf.u 'c._' :::,rrr.'-(,·'[O' rosr 'f d • 1~", '?"l ".-~. .' Nl "). ~.:;. I •----------'."
iIII
I

i B)' J(!t:k Anderson.

!Locked in the darkest
.(or before the motley invad- iate 4,gabst
'ers ];Ind"ci on the island. Their' ned}'. President .r-n\;nmp;ele wil h secr-et ;'Y~~5at .
~gmteri~g :'Iiiami Beach hotelsreo ~arr-ival was expected to touch! To set up the Castro a~, \, ;j.:and rn i d n i g b t po...~;boat,
icesses oC the Central Iotelli.!oif a general uprising, which ination, the CIA enlisted h 0': dashes to ;>;>cretlandin~ spots _ !;enre .-\gency is the story Of: (he Ccmmunist militia would:ert :i\I.:!heu, a former ;', '1; on l'::e C:.:~a:J coast, Once, no- " :six assasslnarlon attempts: have had more trouble ut"n"; agent with shadowy contac , I:~e;!i's boat was shoeout fro:>:! _ .against Cuba's -;"idel Castro. I': _. , . ,~ '"'.''' who had handled other undo \ :under him.

!
I
Co ..... \1, .. , ~;: ... fl' -

people have known the terri··Castro to lead them.
l~le secret, Th~y.hav.e swornIAfter the iirst

....
For III vears onlv a 'em key I'aown without the charlsmatlc :cover asslsnments for the Ci \'.LFor the ~:r.t trv t'ne C"' ~.
i_of... 0 • .1 L J.';
';ithJ.J"\..~.

:out of .his Washington public "urnlshed Roselll s'C~ci.!.l'~ attempt jrela.tions oiIice; Heto ~ate~' '.'lison. capsules to ~!lP 'intO::r :ne\'er to talk. let ....e [learned the details have]failed, iive more assassination jInO\:d. to .Las VegasT .r:ea~! astro s.rood. The porson was from! t _, t t C b 'I'h ;up billionaire Howard Hughes ' :pposed to take three i:'.ays 10 .

isources whose credentials are! earns were sen o. u a. ".e:);i'vada operations, '. \', By the time Castro died.

i ~eyond question.

~
last team
reporte-dly made It!
:-'Iabeu

i
We spoke to John :'IIcCone,~lO a rooftop within shooting;sell!, a

recruited :!.~£:..:.h', system would t~rowoff all ruggedly handSQmp.:;t; \ -es of ~hepoison, so he Iwho beaded the C:~A .at the! distance of ~astro b'efo~e they ;==gamo1er ,,:,Hll ,contacts In both l\'>. \ -d appeal' to be the victlm ltime' of the assassinatlon at Iwere apprehended. This hap·:the American and Cuban un·lo!~, natural.if mysterious ail.

Itempts. He acknowledged theIpened around the Iast of Feb·; derworlds. to arrange the a5-1 me, \ : idea had been discussed insideIruary or first of March, 1%3. isassinatlon. T.nedapper, hawk-j R.-; -Tl arranged with a [the CIA but Insisted it had, Nine months

ibeen "r e j e cted immedi-]dent Kennedy!atelv," He vizorously denied:down in Dallas by Lee Harvey[Lang, was a power in, the !pe.lle!'

later, Presl-:faced Roselli, formerly rnar-.Cub» '\ was gunned!ried to movie actress J:une:tro's " related to one of Cas.
"$.
to pl.ant the deadlv .. the dictator's food. i1hat the crx had everpartici·l~swald. a fan~tic who pre·in:o\:ie ;n~usrry until hi~_~0!1'!0!1 :'ILl ,., 1,3,1961, Roselli de'
I paled in any plot on Castro's: viously had agitated fpr CasIvtction with racketeer '.\ Illie ]llvered ',. cansules to hlJ .con.'

Iiffe. Asked whether the at·: tro in Xew O:leans f3nd J:ad IBioCf ina mil1~oc:-d~lJ.arHollY·ltacl at : . ,.:ni Be3ch's lilamor. Ilerr.pts <,ould ha"e heen madelmade a myslerIous trIp to ,hepvoodlabor snaKeaown; The1ou3?01l,1 nehle:!u Hotel.

!with
his

knowl~dse.
he
re'l

C~ban
Embassy

iIi could not have hap., CIty.

l\'Iexico IcrA assig!led t:vo ofit~.~osti A cou~:' ,·r·...21:1<:; later, just
iplied: "It truslt>d operat.lves. WIllIam! about ,!::' ,·:;:tllime ior the !pen;d." ~
1,\ e have COlll.:Jl't:te :dence, howe I; e r. in !sources.
.1 Among ~hose privy.to .the'H~r\'ey and••TaI?es (Bi~ Jim)!plot 10 ,.'... been !..!l-;-;l'dout, conIl': CIA conspIracy, there IS still a OConnell, ,0 Lie husn.hush; a r;~po": '::1 oi H:a·.4~1'1 l'aid ourlnag gin g suspicion---:-unsup· murder mission. using poony:east~() H ill. El:~

!ported bY' the Warren Com· names. theY accompanied RO'/coven'd "~':ore the,Ra;. i,e reo l)i ?igs ; The plot to knock off Castro !r.1ission·s iindings-lhat· Cas- ,.elli on trips to Miami to line ;im"asion .', \prilli, i!i~:I. 'beganliS ;Ja,t -(;[ the Bay of! lro became aware uf the u.S,
;Pi:;s HP~:·.li"n Th~;nu·nt.,,·as~rh)t apon. h~... U~·~ ~'!~c! ....t:':1~

up the assassination teams. i Four n'·"att~m:l~~
The;f:zll
storyr~~ds ~jkl? t~p i:l3dp en .· ..l\t':"o·.~ :;~.a.

'\',;ol't"
. tv.t,,·ii:n!:l·~:"~ L~~e '·uoan CHeta·· huw :·t·t:-taH~r! l).... ..A,a~ i ~~f a··la· .. ':.'j 'f": ::: ~1 Ja:nes ~)onC1 i:10".tJf? :: :':)';~. a ...::. :.' 1::;-. ::,..:::-..::s.• :::.c

00018

_
<.. •
".-
---_
_-----
--~_.-_.-.-.~
.
--_._--

Blt
_-_.._

.
'1-
1

.. .r: ."/ .........- -...

.. '1-:\; il........,.i./·:':,·f ;j'; :.......'J ._ ....1...I:v
'0001.9
rl til! III W::: ras m5 Pl...::osrrmq!: we.1; nnr
~,.
v'

.: -. : :'-.~::'"

00020


,...•,

~ ....... '-... ...... '..
PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD

Project Mockingbird, a telephone intercept activity, was conducted between 12 March 1963 and 15 June 196'3, and targeted two Vfashingtonbased newsrnen who, at the time, had been publishing news articles
based on, and -f'requently quoting', classified 'materials of this Agency and others, including Top Secret and Special Intelligence. Telephone intercept connections were installed at the new m e nt s office and at each of their homes, for a total of 3. The connections were established with the assistance of a telephone company official who responded to a personal request by the Director of Security, Col. Sheffield Edwar d s, Col. Edwards' authority for the activity ~vas Mr. John A. McCone, Director of Central Intelligence. The latter conducted the activity in coordination with the Attorney General (Mr. Robert Kennedy), the Secretary of Defense [Mr, ,Robert McNamara), and the Director of the Defense.Intelligence Agency (Gen. Joseph Carroll), In addition to Office of Security personnel directly involved in the intercepts and research of materials acquired therefrom, only 3., other Agency officials are on record as witting of the activity: the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence (General Marshall S. Carter), the Inspector General (Lyman Kir kpa.tr i c k] and the General Counsel. (Mr. Lawrence Houston). The intercept activity was particularly productive in identifying contacts of the newsmen, their method of operation and many of their sources of information. For example, it was determined that during the period they received data from 13 newsmen, 12 of whom were identified; 12 senators and 6 members of Congress, all identified; 21 Congressional staff m errrbe r s , of whom 11 were identified; 16 government empIoyees , including a staff member of the White House, members of the Vice President's office, an As s i stant Attorney General, and other well-placed individuals. A number of other sources were partially or tentatively identified, but the short span of the activity,precluded positive identification. It was observed that through these contacts the newsmen actually received more classified and official data than they could use, and passed some of'bhe stories to other newsmen for release, establishing that many "leaks'" appearing under other by-lines were actually from the sources of the target newsmen.

S~v.
n '1' .r.IRW as P HEn$;0;;W"RS".,. I 17mll"l


00_....0_ __0\' 000 ....
!..
_. : ~ •• • R •
....... "
.r

00022

..'
\.
r
.. c, ,. ~...'
SUBJECT: Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenko

Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenkq, an officer of the KGB, defected to -a representative of this-Agency in Geneva, Switzerland, on 4 February 1964. The responsibility for his exploitation 1vas assigned to the then SR Division of the Clandestine Service and he was brought to this country on 12 February 1964. After initial interrogation by representatives of the SR Division, he was moved to a safehouse in Clinton, Maryland, from 4 April 1964 where he was confined and interrogated until 13 August 1965 when he was moved to a s:ecially constru~t~d."jail" in a. r ernote

wooded area atf ~ IThe SR Dlvls10n was convlnced -that he was a dlspa ched agent but even after a long period of hostile interrogation was unable to prove their contention and he was confined atIlin an effort to convince him to "confess." This Office together with- the Office of General CouIT?el became increasingly concerned with the illegali~y of the Agency's position in handling a defector under these conditions for such a long period of time.Strong representations were made to the Director (Mr. Helms) bythis Office, the Office of General Counsel, and the

Legislative Liaison Couns~l, and on 27 October 1967, the responsibility for Nosenko's further handling was transferred to the Office of Security<sub> und~r the direction of the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, then Admiral Rufus Taylor.Nosenko was moved to a comfortable safehouse in the Washington area and was int.erviewed--under---friendly,
.sympathet Lc conditions by his Security Case Of-ficer, Mr. Bruce Solie, for more than a year. It soon became apparent that Nosenko was bona fide and he was moved to more comfortable surroundings with considerable freedom of independent movement and has continued to cooperate fUlly with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and this Office since that time. He has proven to be the most

00023

• L •r,".

v~luable and economical defector this Agency has ever had and leads which were ignored by the SR Division were ex lored and have resulted in the arrest and prosecution

e curren lvorce from his Russian wife and remarried an American citizen. He is happy, relaxed, and appreciative of the treatment accorded him and states "while I regret my three years of incarceration, I have no bitterness and now und.erstand how it equId happen."

00024 T
tS Ol~lY

MORl DoclD: l45l843

I ,/' .. • .*<11


.. ' \
l.

"

'r

00025


, "'
t. ~.t

~---------------


'1. SURVEILLANCES

A·I__

During the periods 1-20 February~ 12 April-7 May~ and 9-20 Au~ust 1971, a surveillance was conducted of

Lrl-----------,."

la former staff employee~ and a".-r-;-;LJu-J..oan nationa1 wi th whom [become professionally and emo

~t~~~o~n~aTl.~lY~l'-n~v~o~IT~-v~e~ca~.~SurveillanceIwas predicated upon information thatl had beeri seeking from employees information ln Information Processing Division

fi1es~ and that em~loyees were visiting by L - a photographic
~n Fairfax

studio operated City, Virginia. one surreptitious entry of the photographic studio was made, and an attempt to enter the apartment ofl Iwas aborted because of a door lock problem.

In addItIon to phYSIcal surveIllance,'
B.

Pursuant to a request from the CI Staff, approved by the DCI, surveillances were conducted ofl and her associates "at various times from May:--:it:-;o"":-'S"""e"""p=-=t""'e=-:m:;:-br::-e=r:::1971.

an

ad long been a source0 IV~Slon
'-,:;-....-::l.....,;;--:;--.~..-J
information re.garding a, plot to assassinate kidnap Vice President Agnew and the DCI. Surveillances included coverage of the activities of Miss King during two visits to the United States; technical coverage of debriefings of her by WH Division representatives in New York City, and surveillance, including mail coverage, of several American citizens a.lLeged -to be part of the plot. Although most of the surveillance occurred in New York City, surveillance of one of the individuals included extensive coverage of a commune in Detroit.

C. CELOTEX I

At the direction of the DCI, a surveillance was conducted of Michael Get1er of the Washington Post- during

SE EY~ ET OlJLY 00026



the periods 6-9 October, 27 October-IO December 1971 and on 3 January 1972. In addition to physical surveillance, an observation post was maintained in the Statler Hilton Hotel where observation could be maintained of the building housing his office. The surveillance was designed to determine Getler's sources of classified information of interest to the Agency which had appeared in a number of his columns.

D. CELOTEX II

At the direction of the DCI, surveillance was con~ ducted of Jack Anderson and at various times his "leg
men., II Britt Hume,.' Leslie Whitten, and Joseph Spear, from 15 February to 12 April 1972. In addition to the

physical surveillance, an ob servat i.on post was' maintained in the Statler Hilton Hotel directly opposite Anderson's office. The purpose of this surveillance was to attempt to determine Anderson's sources for highly classified Agency information appearing in his syndicated columns.

E. BUTANE

At· the direction of the. DCI, a surveillance was conducted on Victor L. Marchetti from 23 March to 20 April 1972. The purpose of this surveillance was to determine his activities and contacts both with Agency employees and other individuals in regard to his proposed book and published magazine articles exposing Agency operations.

II. POLICE SUPPORT

A. During 1969, 1970, and 1971, on se.veral occasions, the Intelligence Division of the Metropolitan Police Department was prOVided a communications system to monitor major anti-Vietnam war demonstrations in the Washington area. This system consisted of a radio

·receiver and an Agent at the Intelligence Division.

Headquarters and several automobiles from the Washington Field Office equipped with radiQ receivers and transmitters and manned by two WFO Agents, as well as a representative of the Intelligence Division, Metropolitan Police Department. The benefit to the Agency was, that the communications over this system were monitored at the Headquarters Building to provide instant notice of possible actions by the dissidents against Agency installations.

.

0002.7 ..

'.

B. During the period from 1968 to 1973, several items of positive audio equipment consisti~g primarily of clandestine transmitters and touch-tone dial recorders were loaned to the Metropolitan Police Department, Fairfax County, Virginia, Police Department, Montgomery County, Maryland, Police Department, New York City Police Department, and theSan Francisco, California, Police Department.

III. GENERAL SUPPORT A. SRPOINTER Since 1953, this office has operated a mail intercept program of incoming and outgoing Russian mail and, at various times, other selective mail at Kennedy Airport in New York City. this operation included not only the photographing" of envelopes but also surreptitious opening and photographing of selected items of mail. The bulk of the take involved matters of internal security interest which was disseminated to the Federal Bure~u of Investigation. This program is now
~n a dormant state pending a decision as to whether the operation wilL be contiriued or abolished.

B. AELADLE

For several years the Office" of Security has provided support to Anatole Golitsyn, interest to the CI Staff. I a Russian defector of

c. REDFACE I


In July 1970, this office made entry of an office in Silver Spring, Maryland, occupied by a former defector working under contract for the Agency. This involved by-passing

3

SEt; tCT

ONLY

a surreptitious
a contact and

00028

".

sonic alarm system, entering a vault, and entering a safe within the vault. The purpose of the operation was to determine whether the individual had any unauthorized classified information in his possession.

D. BUREAU OF NA~COTICS AND DANGEROUS DRUGS

In January 1971, the Director approved a request from the Director, Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, to provide covert recruitment and security clearance support to BNDD. This has been accomplished through the medium of a proprietary of the Office of

Securit known as and 0 eratin as I

'----rS..,.u=p"..,p~o=r.."t

~l'-n~c::--' "u::-:!d-=e-::s:---::c::-:o=-=v-=-e=-r=t---=y:-=e-=c:"::r::7u"""l"""t';:m=e-=n"%tC-,----=l"""l::-:w:-:-e=s=71-:::g-:=a:"=-::1'-'0=-=n=-----:!,p01Ygraph , medical clearance, into three phases: and training. It has been divided (1) A CI operation to place individuals in BNDD field offices to monitor an il1e a1 activities of other

BNDD employees; (2) ) ecru1tment0 an 1n 1V1 by BNDD but actually employed by BNDD, although this fact is known only to the Director and Chief Inspector, BNDD. In this case, arrangements were made for all pay and other employee benefits to come from CIA on a reimbursable basis.

E. I

F. MERRIMAC

From February 1967 to November 1971,f I an Office of Security proprietary, recruite~ anu nallulbd several -Agents for the purpose of covertly monitoring

00029

r ~ • •

r

F~f \' O~:l.Y


dissiderit groups in· the Washington area considered to be potential threats to Agency personnel and installations. One of these Agents so successfully penetrated one dissident group that she wa~ turned over to the FBI for handling. In addition, during this period, the Office of Security field offices were tasked with collecting available'intelligence on dissident groups. All such information was included in a periodic report distributed to appropriate parts of th~ Agency and to certain outsideGovernment agencies.

F.IG-.~ .----=======:::::::-_------'-----------,

5 00030

._1>.
.~ .
.. , " ..
" ".~ ,
.... ...-~ .'
.< ~~. :.
.... !'
",' .

I . ,

.

..:.' .
.. ::,.

[ . , ." ...

>:.>::~! .... .'

,

00031.

..

.

MORl DocID: 1451843

MATERIAL REQUISITIONED FROM LOGISTICS BY SECURITY FOR ISSUANCE TO LOCAL POLICE ITEM Gas Mask M-9 Gas Mask M-17

j

ISteel Helmet and Liners L Vest and Groin Protector Vest, Flak M-52 Vest, Protective Vest, Grenade Execuvest Emergency Flashing Red Light *Searchlight, Tear Gas *Chemical Baton 6 1/2" *Chemical Baton 12" "*Chemical Baton 26" *Mustang 35 Pistol '~Searchlight with" Shoulder Strap36
*Stun Gun

3
*NOTE: Various quantities and types of replacement chemical
cartridges, loading kits, and batteries were alsoordered for asterisk items.
'--
1032

gUA_NITY 200
196
2'31
96
34
46
105
6
22
36
36
24
24
6


..1....

00033

MORI DocID: 1451843

SUBJECT": Audio Countermeasures S~pport to the United States Secret Service On 2S July 1968, and at the specific request of the United States Secret Service, this Office provided two audio countermeasures technicians to the United States Secret Service in connection· with the Democratic National Convention held in Chicago, Illinois. This was not an official detail although both men were provided with temporary credentials identifying them as being affiliated with the United States Secret Service.

On IS August 1968, we detailed the same two mento the United States Secret Service to cover the Republican National Convention in Miami, Florida~ On both occasions, the team members were debriefed upon, their return and it is clear that their activities were confined exclusively to.sweeping the candidates and potential candidates quarters.

00034

l

00035

'-

..

I

15 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: SUBJECT

Mr. Howard Osborn' Director of Security

Identification of Activities with Embarrassment Potential for the Agency 1. In responding on 7 May by memorandum to the DDO's request for the identification of any incident which might conceivably have an embarrassment potential for the AgencYt I cited the equipment test which is mentioned in the attached memo. The test in uestion was related to the development of

,


~~~~~were in and out of some four hotels in Miami, with ~:1:~·:1 :radio equipment. This was shortly before the political con. :":.,:"_":ventions, and at least one of the hotels was within a blockh::,'l·:'.of the convention hall. 2. Although this completely, innocent--although subject to misconstrual--activity may already have been drawn to your attention by your ,own

staff,~it has occurred to us
awar-£ of it; given the involve

that we should ensure you are ment of a Security officer,

Att: M/R dated 7 Ma: 73 by

ISUb]: I~ qU1pmen

~

Test, M1am1,la., Aug 71

-r.


00036

<--I.

~
.. ,.
I
7 May 1973
.1'ffiMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT : I IEquipment Test, Miami, Florida,


A~gl;lst 1971

, The following details concerning ther'~ ~ -=~ments for Subject tests were provided by

II during a telephone cO·~n::;;v':;"";e::::r~s~·a=-;;---=-:::-='"":l=i.

the unaers~gned, 7 May 1973.

r
L

~--~~~~~~~r~e~t~i~red,
formerly assigned to
for the August 1971 Field
l.c;;;r.:::===r====:::;:==;::::;::;::::o=:rL--------I.----------J--------~Security

arrangements or e es an e on ehalf of 1....---"'----

and the2vis~torsb~1 llin conjunction witli the

~at the _ ecur~t~ Off~cer r :vnq w§}s I I ~

IDUe.

duties. ~OI ce ntnas in daily contact ,-nthIMiami[ the course of his officiaI IXaXSo


I

f{


Iwas reluctant- to calli Iat home

~=-==~~t~e~lephone line. to inquire about the specifics

arrangements at this point, and suggested

·1----.----ld'======iiSeco.rity Officer by', this time might have ack to Headquarters and be available for
a.ons e

--.-~I,---_-----,.__I,


The aboVe details were provided by telephone tor--l_______, Chief, Division D at 1650 hours thisda~

Distribution:C.signedJ.1 Orig - : !File

<sub>00037. 1_

- ,.
S-~T

. 0._._~__.-.
MORT DocTD: 1451843

LJ (OI~fl


ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
-sU1ljEcr:lo;~:~ii--------------------·----·---------·------------1

"--"-----.-..----.--.-------------..--EY.Tit.,S~Ot~:.~~.~..==~~===~~_-_-_.. . _

.__._--
Director of Securit
----_._---_._---~

TO: IO!i:<~r cI.,is-·"tion,

teem
••umber,
cOO

._-_[.j
DATE

DATE I+----------_---.:_------~

building) OrtlLtiC.

!---r-r-'-_. AROEO INIT!ALS COMMn.nS (Number "och comment 10 :how From ...hem
fa .",hom. Draw a [ine ccross column after each c"mment.)

REalVEO
fO~W
~-----
------------jf---.--------.---+--------------------1
1.
Ex. Dir. -Compt.-.._---1i 2.
t

IJ. 4.
!I5.-I

I
~
6.
/!

7:c
B.
r

r 9.i
10.
11.
12.

- 00038

13.
14.

15. _


.w" ""UI \(
" : t ,)I.' oINTERNAL oUNCLASSIFIEDL~:: 610us~Dr:.~~~us~"._0CONFIDENTIAL
__ ...,__.'USE ONLY'...-__.__~&.~i!~{L-~:;::; ;__ ._.'~ .._ ~~_ ,
MORI DocID: 1451843

, " ..j (


. '.
15 FEB ';:372
MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director-Comptroller
SUBJECT ROSELLI, John
1. This memorandum is for your inforU1ation only.

2. Reference is made to our recent conver sation regarding the Agency's participation in political assassinations. Attached hereto is a memorandum dated 19 November 1970 which was furnished to Mr. Helms setting forth the circumstances of the Subject's

activities

on

behalf of the Agency. Initially Roselli was unwitting

of Government interest, but as time went on, he suspected that the U. S. Government was involved and specifically the CIA. 3. Roselli is presently serving a prison sentence for conspiracy in a Federal penitentiary in Seattle, Washington and awaits deportation upon completion of his current sentence•

.

4. This Agency was aware that Roselli intended to exp9se" his participation in the plot should we not intervene on his behalf. The DCI decided to ignore his threats and take a calculated risk as to the consequences that may occur with the disclosure of his:"story. This was subsequently done by Roselli or someone on his behalf furnishing Jack Anderson details of the incident. Attached hereto are two of Anderson' s az-ticle s dealing with "Roselli. Anderson is also Editor of the Washington Bureau of the Washington Post, Sunday supplemental "Parade. "

5. Individuals who were aware of this project were: Messrs.
Dulles, Bissell, Colonel J. C. King, Colonel Sheffield Edwards,

00039


... , ": ..

William Harvey, and James P. O'Connell. Also include'd were

Robert A. Maheu and'his attorneys Edward P. Morgan and Edward Bennett Williams.
6. On 26 February 1971 arrangements were rnada with Immigration and Naturalization Service Comrl1issioner Raymond Farrell to flag any action that may be taken hy his o,rganization regarding deportation proceedings against Roselli. On26 January 1972 James F. Green, ASSociate Commissioner for I&NS, advised that they were deferring' any deportation action for another year and would again call it to Our attention upon expiration of the deferral.

Atts

SEC ET 00040
ES OttlY

.'!
MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director-Con,ptroHer
SUBJECT ROSELLI, John
..
1. This rnernoz-andurn is for your _i.nf~rmationonly.

z. Reference is made to our recent conversation regarding the .Agency's participation in politic;!.l assassinations. Attached her-eto is a rnerrror-a.ndtrm dated 19 November 1970 which was furnished to Mr. Helms setting forth the circumstances of the Subject's activities on behalf of the Agency. Initially Roselli was unwitting

·i
of Government interest, but as time went on, he suspected that the
IU. S. Gover nrnent was involved and specifically the CIA.
,

3. Roselli is presently serving a prison sentence for conspiracy in a Federal penitentiary in Seattle, \\Tashington and awaits deportation upon completion of his current sentence.

4. This Agency was aware that Roselli intended to expose
I .

hiB participation in the plot should we not.intervene on his behalf. The DCI decided to ignore his threa.ts and take a calcuiated risk as to the consequences that may occur with the disclosure of his story. This wall subsequently done by Roselli or someone on his behalf furnishing Jack Anderson details of the incident. Attached hereto are two ofAnderson's articles dealing with Roselli. Anderson is also
Editor of the Vlashington Bureau of the Washington Post, Sunday supplemental "Parade. It

5. Individuals who were aware of this project were: Messrs.
Dulles, Bissell. Colonel J. C. King. Colonel Sheffield Edwards.

'00041l

.....

WilliDm Harvey, and J'arnes P. O'Connell. Also included were Robert A. l..,.~C'\.heu and his attorneys Edward P. Morgan and Ed-ward Bennett Williams. 6. On·26 February 1971 arrangernents were made with
I:mn:.igr~tionand N<:ituralization Service Commissioner Raymond Farrell to flag any action that may be taken b}r his or ga niaatfon regarding deportation proceedings egainst Roselli.. On 26 .January 1972 James F. Creon, .Associate Commissioner for I&NS, advised that they were deferring any deportation action for another year
and would again call it to -ouz attention upon expfratlon of the deferral.

nOWaro J lXJsborn
Director of Security
Atta
-
MORl DoclD: l45l843
iI
-. -. ..- ..-
Atts
...~.
I'
-.
'.
'.. \. 00043

, r

e°
Co.
MI:n'fORANDUM FOR:
Director of Centz-al Il1i;elligence
E-:UBJ.ECT
ROSFLLI, Johnny
1. This memorandum is for inf'onuation only.

2. In August 1960, Mr. Richard 1v'!:. ,Bissell approached Colonel Sheffield Edwards to determine if the Office of Security had assets that may assistin a sensitive mission requiring gangster-type action. The mission target was Fidel Castro. 3. Because of its extreme sensitivity, only a small group was made privy to the project. The ncr was briefed and gave his approval. Colonel J. C. King, Chief, \YH roivision, was briefed, but all details were delfbez-at.el.y concealed from any of the JM\VAVEofficials. Certain TSD and Cornrno personnel participated in the initial planning stages, but were not witting of the purpose of the mission. , 4. Robert A. Maheu was contacted, briefed generally on the project. and requested to ascertain if he could develop an entree into the gangster elements as the first step toward accomplishing. the d~sired goal. 5. Mr. Maheu advised that he had met one Johnny Roselli on several occasions while visiting Las Vegas. He only knew him casually through clients, but was given to understand that he was a high-ranking member of the "syndicate" and controlled all of the ice-m.aking m.achines on the Strip. Maheu reasoned that, if Roselli was in fact a member of the clan, he undoubtedly had connections leading into the Cuban gambling interests.


6. Maheu was asked to approach Roselli, who knew MahC'u as a personal relations executive handling domestic and foreign' a.ccounts, and tell him that he had recently been retained by a client: who z-epr e sentcd several international busines s firms which were suffering heavy financial losses in Cuba as a result of Castro's action. They were convinced that Castro's rernoval

I was the answer to their problern and w er e willing to pay a price of $150,000 for its successful a ccornpIishrnerrt, It was to be made

Iclear to,Roselli that the U. S. Governrrrent was not, and should not, become aware of this operation. '

I7. The ,pitch'was made to Roselli on 14 Septernber 1960 at the Hilton Plaza Hotel, New York City. His initial reaction was

i

to avoid getting involved but, through Maheu's persuasion, he

I , agreed to introduce him to a friend, Sam Gold, who knew the "Cuban crowd. II Roselli made it clear he did not want any money for his part and believed Sam'would feel the same way. Neither of these individuals was ever paid out of Agency funds. 8. During the week of 25 ,September, Maheu was in~roduced to Sam who was staying at the Fontainebleau Hotel, Miami Beach.
It was several weeks·after his meeting with Sam arid Joe, who was, identified to hiIn as a courier operating between Havana and Miami, that he saw photographs of both of these individuals in the Sunday supplemental "Parade.' 1 They were identified as Momo Salvatore Giancana and Santos Trafficant, respectively. Both were on the . list of the Attorney General's ten most-wanted men. The former was described as the Chicago chieftain of the Cosa Nostra and successor to Al Capone, and the latter, the Cosa Nostra boss of Cuban operations. Maheu called this .office-immediately,upon ascertai:ling this information. 9. In discussing the possible methods of accomplishing this mission, Sam suggested that they not resort to firearms but, if he could be furnished some type of potent pill, that could be placed in Castro's food or drink, it would be a much more effective operatton, Sam indicated that he had a prospective nominee in the person of Juan Orta, a Cuban official who had been receiving kickback payments from the gambling interests, who still had access, to Castro, and was in a financial bind.

00045

l..'/····;·~~


JO. TSD was zcqueatedto produce six pills of high lethal
content.

11. Joe delivered the pills to Orta. Af'ter several w eelcs of reported attempts, Orta apparently got cold feet and asked out of the a s signrnerrt, He suggested ariother candidate who made ' several attempts without succes s s 12. Joe then indicated that Dr. Anthony Verona, one of the principal officers in the Cuban Exile Junta, had becorne disaffected
with the apparent ineffectual progress of the Junta and was \viIling to handle the rrris s'ion through his own r e sourcea, 13. He asked, as a prerequisite to the deal, that he be given $10,000 for organizational expenses and requested $1, 000 worth of cornrnunica.tions equipment. 14. Dr. Verona's potential was never fully exploited, as the project was canceled shortly after the Bay of Pigs episode. Verona was advised 'that the offer was withdrawn, and the pills were retrieved.

15. Of significant interest was an incident which involved
a request levied by Sam. upon Mabeu.

At the height of the project negotiations, Sam
expz-es s ed concern about his girlfriend, Phyllis McGuire, who he learned was .getting much attention from Dan Rowan while bothwe~e booked at a Las Vegas night club. Sam asked Maheu to put a bug in Rowan' 8 room to determine the extent of his intimacy with Miss McGuire. The

1

.technician involved in the assignment was discovered in 'the process, arrested, and taken to the Sheriff's office
I for questioning. He called Maheu and inform.ed him that

ihe had been detained by the police. This call was rnade
in the presence of the Sheriff's personnel.

Subsequently, the Department of Justice announced its intention to prosecute Maheu along with the technician. On 7 February 1962, the Director of

3
~::••! '{.:
~ ~ :.t'

00046'

.i"
i .
/

Security briefed the Attorney Gener a l , Robert Kennedy, on the cir cumstanccs leading up to 'Maheu's involvement in the wir etap, At our request, p roaecutdon was ch"oJ?ped.

16. In May 1962, Mr.· W·illiam Harvey took over' as Case Officer', and it is not known by this Office whether Roselli was used operationally £1'011.'1 that point on. 17. It was subsequently learned f'rorn the FBI that Roselli had been con.victed on six counts involving illegal en.try into the United States. Our records do not reflect the date of conviction, but it is believed to have been sornetfrne during November 1967. 18. On 2 December 1968, Roselli, along with four other individuals, was convicted of conspiracy to cheat members of the Friars Club of $400,000 in a rigged gin gummy game.

L

19. Mr. Harvey reported to the Office of Security of his contacts with 'Roselli durfng November and De'cernber 1967 and January 1968. It was his belief that Johnny would not seek out the Agency for assistance in the deportation proceedings unless he actually faced deportation. Roselli expressed confidence that he would win an appeal. ~ 20. On 17 November 1970, Maheu called James OIConnell, Roselli's first Case Officer. to advise that Maheu's att.orriey, Ed Morgan, had received a call from a Thomas Waddin, Roselli's Iawyer, who stated that .alLav:eriues of appeal had been exhausted, and his client now faces deportation. Waddin indicated that, if someone did not intercede on Roselli's behalf, he would make a complete expos e of his activities with the Agency. 21. On 18 Novernber 1970, you were briefed on the latest development in this caae, andit was decided that the Agency would not in any way assist Roselli. Maheu was so advised of the Agency's position. and he was in complete agreement with our stand. He further advised that he was not concerned about

4
v- ••_ ~-':~f
t t '. : _ ~_., ~
~'!"'r: _~

\ . , 00047~: ..,'.. _.'~ •


,~ ..... ,
."

. any publicity as it affected him personally shou'ld Roselli decide to tell all. He stated he would advise us promptly of any developrnerrts that Ire may become aware of in this rnatter ,

Howard J. Osborn
Director of Security
5.
... ...., r' . J
~":'.~ ..__1."
'.. .:...00048.
~
THE WASUIXGTOX POST,~foudar, .1111I. 18, 1?:1 B7
------------_.....:.....:....:..._----

It: . J{i-"'-1't n .,.,,,.~in .fl.~ to -rr7 "111 I("1f),7f:l;A_4If). 7J~ 7?.n:~ (fr-x J.J t;1 .
~fil.Sd.,<GlJl!itIYltCl li~7L!l ~u~tL!fUI fU([JL{U!J!, u» 0Jil-1. ~

Bj' ] acl: AlI(r.er.~on

I,

t(or before the motley im'ad',iale 'against President

ers landed on the island, Their' nedy, . - Ken-: complete wth secret trysts at. _ Igllttering :\1iaml Beach hotels, ': Locked. in the darkest re- arrival was expected to touch To set up the Castro assassi- and mid it I g h t powerboat ~

I

cesse,s of the ?entral Intellloff a general uprising. which nation, the CIA enlisted P..Qfl:Idashes tol'....crct i::ndln;: !;;lots :.gence Agency 15 the story of Ithe Communist militia would,....e~~~I~ a fc,rmc.'r -r~Bf\on the Cuhan coast. Once, no- : '\SiX. nss:.ssin:.t!,?n attempts ~ have had more trouble nulling lagent witn sh?dowy contacts, ~ sefli's boat was 0110.t out from:.:,ilg:unst Cuba's 1'ldel Castro. i .' , _" who had handled other under-lunder him. . _:, For 10 years, only a few keyIdown WIthout the chartsrnatlc cover ass,lgnmen';Sfor the CI.AI For the finf. try. the CIA:,;' people have known the terri-I Castro to lead them. ble secret. They have sworn After the first out ?f hls Wa.shmgton publicIfurnished Roselli with :;pecial'( attempt relations office. He later poison capsules to sllp IntO:~'.
never
to talk. Yet we have-lfalJed five more assas~ination moved to Las Vegas to head I! Castro's food. The polson Willi learned the details from '. .t C. b T' up billionaire Howard Hughes' supposed to take- :!lre:c cloys to sources whose credentials' are teams \Iere sent 0 u a. ne Xevada operations.neIact, By the time (';,:;1,0 died 'beyond question. jlast team reportedly marie it. Maheu recruited John his system would thrcw off ali .We spoke to John. McCone, to. a rooftop within shootingIselli, a ruggedly handsome traces of the polson, so he
~ho headed the CIA .at theIdistance .of Castrobefo~e they Igambler ~ith contacts In both would appear to be the viclim bme·of the assasslnation at'lwere apprehended. ThIS hap:lthe American and Cuban un"lo! a natural if mysterious ailtempts; He -acknowledged the pened around the last of Feb·Iderworlds. to arrange the as- ment.

lldea had been discussed inside Iruary or first of March, ]963. .sassination, The dapper. hawkIRoselli arranged with .a .~ ':Ie CIA .but insisted it had Nine months later, l>rcsI'.lfa.red Roselli. formerly mar-] Cuban, related to one of Cas. '. was gunned! rled to movie actress JUne tro's.chefs, 10plant the deadly'

l..een fir e j e cted immedl- dent Kennedy ately," .He vigorously denied1down in Dallas by Lee Harvey'Lang, was a power in the pellets in the dictator's food. that the CIA had ever partlcl- Oswald, a fanatic. who pre- movie industry Until his con'lon 1Ilarch 13,1961. Roselli de. : . pated in any plot on Castro'sIviously 'had agitated ior Cas- viction 'With 'racketeer..Willie livered the capsules to his con: .

life. Asked whether the at'ltro in New Orleans and had Bioff ~n a million-dollar Holly-]tact at Miami Beach's glamor'.:,tempts could have been madelmade a mysterious trip to the wood labor shakedown. The~ous Fontainebleau Hotel. :
with ~is knowledge. he re:lcuban Embassy in Mexico CIA assigned two of its mostlA

Iplied: "It could not have hapCity. _priv~' trusted operatives, pcned... Among those to thelHar\'ey and James We have complete contl-] CIA conspiracy, there is still aIO'Connell, to the couple of weeks later just William about the right .tirne !o; the (Big Jlm>!'Plot to have been carrled OUI hush-hush fa report out of Havana r.air/
'I'dence, 11 0 we ve r, in our'lnag gin gsuspi~ion-unsup.,murder mission. Usin/(. phonyICastro was ill. But he r I

!

sources. ported by the \~arrE'n com'lnamE's, they accompanied ne covered before the Bay ofP;i~ Cas- selli on trips to :Miami to line jim'asion'on April 17.1961. The plot to knock off Castro :mission's fin.dings-that ;be:,:an as part of -the Bay ofitro became awa~e of the U,5. up the assassination tea~s. I Four iPi~s op"I'::IiI'/1 The intent was, pld upon hls !l!,. aru! ~"m('ol The full story reads hk(' thp 'maet"
,III {'lhniu;.;" 'Ih(' Cuban clit'ta·Jllllw, rC'{'l'liitrcl (),\\:lld :.., :I'I;.!. s\'l'i·p~. of a ,lam{'s Bond movie,',';19~.,Brl:·M<Cluu;;) ..~..Llt /..r

.__....._--_.._-._----------


more attompts \. I. to
on Castro's lire,

1. ,. _._
00049

!

!
L
:'

r

'.
r
i

r~. V
~i'

r-·
(

, A (

THE \\'ASH1:\GTOX POST
--------------
TUI'$aa.,.,r~b,23,19il
B 11
---_._-----.:

rfY1TA:

VJi

I 1", Jt,.,· :(,l,T'~I"Ml,~oh 1'" R':>0"'r!. :,~;;ii':'I!.;; jnr·, ?("~,:,:li v·-;:h ~('ac;y ?~:~(\;;'!;::;::~i:l on the CIA- payrcll, 'I

I

1\
~'.I'
.,.
Il~

,"'IL t

n"-"
j='\"':'l
'""

"-r
\t.•..",;

":·-~p~ri· c·.·.....


t::~.s ;:,·1.. 1 :1 r,."\ •,:,a~ ';"_t'_ -·i-:· ....r· to 1"'. .:,..: ....~~,.!·
.:" he my;::lfry Tt•.in ·'\/101il,hc'.0 I .. J ~1/.t.". .., C·•••ll"'-.... :t. :,."t .'., .-... ....1"..... H .1#••••:.. -' u. Ijf t, oQ. •• t,. ,t••"" o' •j-..
.,t. .,.l:".
.••0 "::" .:,. .... _ :f.....
.
-al
},ol "'
"",'
:,\"1'
.: \.
I.

tlo" he l'-d j;--rlll'd un-t throuah a :,c:arive o·~ Castro's \',_,,:1 ':(..., ••:.Jl••• ~:_ •• 15
IC1L H:I let..... I
IL.. .=-" ·.·H1.··S.
. Ccnt:_ .. " ".f', 1~f'••C(' • ~f'nc~ .t!"l"Co\·C'r asslcnmonrs for the chef to plant. the.. •. to d:.".:c:..:~s f:1':':rCL\. ;:..·: ..

I
t·•• l "I"C"';\''''-" In d;cta~ors:'1'rv ev said he \-'Id ,;,',1-;-;' re

:. '.'. .
'-"I'o'-V,:t, io l'lP i'ij;s:- ...·~r"';::r.n
ar:ned'O'-"cr, G TInt-cpt~ r"" ·rrIi,('tIU"rn 0 ~.".""'~ .~."1 ..... ;'i, .3.("'': \ 'fl"t _{r't:"'~'t ,;c~,..ror ~ -r-,..J

~"irll'l C3:-'ta r. .s hC":':l i~:<1 It;·t ri:·~.:~:;';"~ r:" '(i~: rt·~i:;:rT;:~·:. i.~ ~~:~ ·:J1;;:in .in

the sick ward
Qf
the Los; same
::\!;,J1CU, inclclt'nt.;;1i:;. who;

~ O:.:.~J\h" ;~~~:;.;:lj'''''' I~ :·;d B"("i;ia~ rl ~ ~;t; Frk:r-',S ci';;!)' c;~~:~·~u. flcs auernpted to inliltrate [rap." Said Harvey: "The Anzelcs County jail. !is now involved in a IC':'31 Dat-: close enough 10 bun CastroIFriar's Club incli\:t:-:,('nt is

Ire is har;(:~fi:-nc. h,1\',·k.f(s~(*rl: tl~ o..·rr phantom hiii~rJIia~rC;co\l,:n. t·):d.'. _. :r,!:r,ny·. RfJE~lli had no more to John Rosclh. once a (~a;:;hln:::: 1Ioward Iiughes' ~·~\"ocaopcr-] ..\,~l :.~x n:;"~"·.~i:"~lr.:l at"·d.) ..I:Hh t;;~~ than Lb ad." figurc. "round

Hollywood .:in~lllillions. II;rr,pt5 :-n':-e .-:l;'I.:. t~e~~:'l!:li ·H~.:.~:;i's l::'.'Tilrs :,r~ so

Ilattereri overltne sprmz
of

l!lo3. Ihrou;n.·:lrying to 2':r

c:li:mr:::::::

now Las '\ e;;ils. now a gray, 6er Tlo!'clli was ;!"ti"

:rear.o}d inmate with a resPira'lbeing asked to perform a se'l'out this perio? Roseiliwo~~ed!their client, citing our storie:;

tory llllmcnt. FBI mcs eret mi~sion for L'1c U.S. gO\" under the d\:"ect supen'\slon!about his secret CL\ sCl'"\"kc•.:
Co;;fid.~ntial idC'n-1crnalent that he paid all his loi two SCCT(~t CIA a;;ents. Wil·' Fi:l::'co tify him as ":,I top Alana fig-I ('xpc'IlSCS out of his owniI:<1r:l Hilr:e-)' i\:Jd Ja:nes' (Bi,;1 Fl~'L':Inns urc" who \'::llc-hed oyer "thc! porkC't ;md risked his neck 10:Jim) O·Connell.I 1,; I .' concealed

illlNC'sts in Lr.s; I,lnd the assassination teamsi
flie
Ve~as

casinos of the Chicago Ion the Cuban coast.
IIRo~cili's
Rm..;arel
.

II)C er ;Jrcssurc Irom ,firearms lobbr. the Treasury

undcrwo!"!d." ..' I Tn Jamcs Bond fashion. he Th'e FBI 'which got wind ofiDepartment., has failed to en

I,


~~osclh has admll(cdto held whispcred meetin~scu-lin the assassination plot. haS!force a vilal section of the
friends ~b:t,~c \~t1S a.r~m ~un'l ,\Iiami !3~ach hotels wilh, tried t·o pum;> Roselli for in.lllGS federal fire;;rms act.
ncr d\lrln,~ ,oe l\O;)rlll~T\\('n·! bans wllhn~ to make an at·,formatir.n. But he was sworn I _. ,

ties. Opel""tin:: :alon:;: the Eal;d tC'mpt on Castro's life. Ont·C'.lto ~j:ence by the CIA and uo i H,e law was 'I'<Jsscd af,er Coast, he IC'arnec! ho\\"to evade; he called on Chiea~o racketj 10 this mcorrient he hasn't bro.i\i;e murders of Sen. Robert Coast Guard culters and po· hoss Sam Giancana to l!:le up iken it. • !:r;:er.ned~· and Dr. :.Iartin Lu· licc patrols.

a contact. The confidentiall )I~anwhile. the Ju~lIce De.!ther .King: later

becCime files report. t.hat Giancana had par::ment. as part'of its crack-ITre;,sur;:

It authorizes ~hc His name Secrcta~' to rcqUJTi' linl_cd \\'it!t the bi;t:cst names "f:ambJing interest and an in-'ldown on pr"anized crime.liull r"'P?~ts of allllrearms and in the ChIC,l~O and Los Allec· tel'est in the shrimp businE'ss tried to nail Roseili. The FBIiammunlllon sales. . les underworld:::. He also de- in. Cuba." Howe\'cr the'Chi· di~co\'ered that his Chica.;oI :Cor the ".\'0 years that ~;;c

veloped contac.ls in ,lhe CUba~Iril!=O gar\~ste'l' tOOk' no directibinh records had been jorge-d,ilaw i~;js hcen in for~e._ :~l':Ullden\·oTlcl br,lorc Cas.tr.o tOOh:lpilrtin the assassination plot. that his name was reaily Fi.ITrC'a;u.~·.~epartmc::t,Ila~_:=-'

O.\'C\· the lIa\"iwa ~itmLillllg I Hoselli ·made midnit;ilt lippo Sacco and that he hadI 1J1()r('~ t'll1>. ,:;,c.y prO....51On. :;.:~:

smos. ' dashes to Cuba with his hin.'d come to this country from ~un Jndu~try has

He. }lad the rir;ht ground {or a 11ush·hush mis'! Once a Cuban si,on~ t.hal 1.!le CIA was rlan·lturncd its !!uns

cQmi'la.~('n,back- assassins in twin powe.ooats. Italy as a child.' He was con. it.would be a bookkcc;Jlll~

patrol ship victed for failing to register as Inightmare. . .. I ..~h.e ..federal. .gO\'et:nm;~t~ ntn ...

m
ID.l1.
As

on his, dark-Ian alien. part. 0. thn!C'ncd boat. t(\re a hole :n thel He was also cl)n\'lct"d for,"n.rn \\ollici ha\(' to com", . B.3Y (1[ P;:5 j~\":::::;(\n.fhe CI:\ i h':l:lQ:n and ~:.tnk t:-:c 1'Qar. Ro.. '(,,(\::Si11rac~: t:j ri=:- card :jrJ~s: c~l the ..~:i:psCHI::t" hn:\ :: '.,
thopE'ci':0.;"i'~"~;':.Off C:lSirO and: f't'Hi ''''asilShccl OUt oi the ~nt LO$ .-\~;eles.· £xi;l:l~i\'l: .~~~~i r:~:u\."'~c~~: ,"~O.,sT'"!~~.....:~..~1c:-:. ....·e Ll!::~1 j~~~.:.~JE:.....c~s, 1\\·~IC'l.;.,\,.,.·""lI'\.:"\ ..~ .... -;..:"".~t \I·f·.:c·n:~rl·~l"·~ C',~,~.....,. :,,,,.1.") mu.:on 1......:..')t.~(. (Ci.'\. I••

1
o
....
"'••

~
"'''.14".....
.
a • "'.1

,. . I cscapr.ct'imo the shadows.. In p.ar!it'T ,roltlml1s. w~.Te·. dalC's,.H3nTX has ~(l••: r£'tirt'~~ 'lain the lIrc",rm", fl..e.;;. . .r.O~(!ill \t";l,S tecrllllrd

I Of Rt'lieUi's two CIA n!'.~O.!c(lmr~:r.~~ ;';ud Sl~;:: to 1'r.:.,:;.


\Hi ':-k~.;~e('k. fot' the Iponed how t,1e Cl.\ furm:·nedI to Ind:ana;.~o;;s ana 0 Couac.l! ~ :~~!. S!::-~.:,~(':~r~s:·~~:c:" •.•,.
.
- -' ...._...~.

• - >or' - - ••' •• - "'7-. .": - .: ·····:.;~"t"'.:-:~-:.--·-r.- ,",~.-~..;'"';:'-"-"':' ,. '.--~--. :--:;-." ..-.._--:-.:;"'~"--_ _ - ::
:- _..:'l..----:'.~ ---'-'7'
'.
_.-.
.I
00.050
,
,"
it

..

· (


,

'£RNAl _.... [J CON( ~NTfAlO-i. ONLY -ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET


SUBJECT: (Optional)

---_.__._._-~--_ .... .r--'------
FROM: Howard J. Osborn . 0EXTENSION'


of Secu~ IHqs.

number, andDATE
-NO.

.-.
.r>.

D~rector I

TO: [Officer designotionl room building)

-.


DATE
;':

CJ

OFFICER'S INITIALS

-&,/./
17 December 1973

COMMENTS (Number each commenl 10 show from wham to

whom. Draw0 line across column after each comment.) RECEIVED FORWARDED ..

1. IG Staff-
Attn: I
-
r>:
, I

?2. ..:zE= T'OMV: \"'~' ..........,.~ ~("I ~ 'I;.t:


}':.._L.':-'" .~-:. ".':,/.." ."
~,"

.-

V T)(-p;77


4.

5. <).D~ J~~ \ ']'-( .~


"
'l i~-'.. ~
6.
7.
" ,l ~.
.
-·'0
8.
- ...0" •

9.
10.
11.

12.<br/> 13.
1....


15.

.~~ e&L~~ ~.l~~c..~~
4 ~L~~ ,*lf~ -~LA t ~~,~


~d

., ~ ·Wu~ -rv


. ~

00051:

~~::' 610 Us~Dm~~~us~-0 ...._. -. -......-_ ..-.._......- "-~~...._-~_.....'..~..


CONFIDENTIAL DINTERNAL
_.-..::.
__
...
;:
..
,
..
_

..

USE ONLY...,
~_. ._.--... --_....;.._---_ ....

_-.

. ,.-'--.'_00'------------
"-'}
L;
,

, .
S" f!o r:" 1:"1 ."'".. .., 'r" ft....'.' 'i.iL~;,;;i ri~.


17 Deca~er 1973
MEMORANDJM FOR TI1E RECORD

SUBJECI': Recent Activities of the Watergate Special Prosecution Staff

1. Early in the evening of 10 December 1973 I received.

,..;=a::...-.=:cte=l=eOF~h~efu~;~n~~e

that he, m tum, had'receJ.v: a call from


'K1f.i1Fi"Rnnr~ffilPrIT~r-n;~'T"'rTl~ 5ntelligence Division, Washington

2. It SO""" that

/had

just spent an hour inconversation at his homeWI:


in the WashingtonMetropo1itanoll.ce DepartiTient Who had

to reportJ

S him on his inteIView that afternoon wi.th a Mr. Martin and a lvfr. Horowitz'lrosecutors of the Watergate Special Prosecution Staff. had been subpoenaed for his appearance and he indicated

t:>

h twO matters:Ithat the two prosecutors were princ::ipa1~y concerned

WJ. . . .
\ a. l\11at type of training had. the Agency given

Imembers of the Washington Metropolitan Police Departmentf how long were the courses? and

Ihow often were they given? .

b. What support did the Agency provide to the , IWashington Metropolitan Police Department during

I
Idemonstrations occurring in the Washington area
in late 1969 and early 19701
I

I 3.

I

Isaid that he had been shown a long list ofinames and asked if any of them had been involved either lilth the

training given the Washington J-;Ietropolitan Police Department or the support to the Washington Jo.fetropolitan Polic~ Department during the

demonstrations.

L

lcou1d ranernber only three names on the


~ist! They werefl

I

4. The three individuals named byI Idid in fact

participate in both the training and support during the demonstrations. They are only three among others of myl Ispecial
support group who were involved in these activities. Of extreme sensitivity is the fact that these same individuals were engaged in other highly sensitive activities which could cause :the Ag6J."1.C:Y severe embarrassment if they were surfaced. today in the current l'l\"atergate climate.II
s. I briefed the Director personally on this development and he indicated that if the training and demonstrations surfaced that he would' simply acknowl.edge that this had occurred but as he had assured members of Congress J we would not engage in this type ofactivity in the future•. He agreed wi.th my suggestion that we have theLegislative Cotmsel brief Congressman Nedzi and Senator Stennis on

this since they have already been briefed on all activities of this nature undertaken by the Agency in the past. I briefed Mr. Jo1m Warner, Acting General Counsel., and areed with him that we would make no effort to brief members of my tootH and if they are subpoenaed. }Vfr. l\Tamer or members of his Sta f will 1:;I1en cautdon them to only answer questions asked and not volunteer

additional infonnation. I am making a copy of this memorandtun available toIlof the Inspector General's Staff at the suggestion of the Inspector General,

j

!!I

I .
who I also briefed on this development. '
.......-~c: IG Staff Attn: 1"

Howard J. Osborn Director of Security

_

---------~~


:. ..-.:.-: ~ .....:., ..::..
7.
. -...".

......-. -.-
~-B..
'; ":".~
"

9.

Ii~IJ-----:T_ \·~1EMORANQUN FOR:


.
1:.
,! '--------T \

f~11 ~

12.
-13.
I 14.

-


15.-
rxl~
(DATE)
FORM 61 0 USE PREVIOUS 00054 j
J-62 EDITIONS~••_.
FORM
NO.

101

REPLACES FORM \0-10\ WHICH MAY 8E USED.I AUG 54

'.

..... .. '-.~.. ~ .:: ~ . ''":..... -_.._...:-.: ..···~r :'''-:-~__~h..~' •• M_ OM_
:';;" :.

0:

'UNCLI\SSIFJE'D'
.
o'~"

J'''?~At . '., D .emn (-_'H_'A...,..l----.;.~'


t ~. IlY --::::;.~_---.r ROUTING AND ~ECORD SHEET'.

I i---------:---------:--~---------_._r

SU5JECT: (Optional) . ,
I
-

I

L
.- .." ..

EXTENSION NO. , . ..fROM: Howar~J. Osborn ·d,fo..". . ..i : DATe
Director of Security77L I I. . 25 MAY 1973


TO: (Orr;co, designatio,n. room numb.,. ar>d L:.:...:...--J D.;.rE
bu;lding) .
1-----=':,.....-----4 OFFicER'S COMMENTS (Numbe, 'each camme,,1 to show from ""ho"" ; : ••.• ReCEIVED 'fORWARDtD INITIALS Icl ...ham. Ora", a line across calum" aff&t eoc" com",,,,,'.)

!}.----..:.-:---,.,-,----~--_t_---+_-'-.:..:...-f_---....::_j
8.

!
9.
"
•••••
..'
-
',"
.-. '0'"
.-:::
."

J
-.
,.,:'
~

r- Q .'.. _


:":~;:i" ,< t: .., :"
1--------------+----l----I----t

..

....... "

110.

- ......

'.

.:» ." ..::.., .
I 11.
I
I

1 -+-__i--_-I-__-1/12.

i
~;..=----------------f_---f_---I_---_1

! 13. I <font size="-1">I I,

--1-+ -+ --1

14.
I,

1-..

lb.

nCONFJDfNTJAl
oINTE:lNAl
.1Il;F O)JIY
.00055
DUNCLASSIfIED
;
(
MErdORANDUM FOR:
Executive Secretary,
CIA Management Committee
SUBJECT
Project TWO-FOLD
1. This memorandum sets forth a recommendation for your
approval in paragraph 5.

2. For the past several years, this office has been supporting the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD) by spotting, assessing, and recruiting personnel to form an internal security unit whose primary mission is the detection of corruption within -the BNDD. Subsequent to the recruitrn.entand" training stage, the individuals selected are turned over to the Chief Inspector of BNDD for operational guidance and handling in their various domestic assigv.ments. 3. Recently, this Agency has exterided this activity by supporting BNDD in the covert acquisition of individuals who are hired as Staff Agents utilized under nonofficial cover and directed against the principal international drug traffickers•. These individuals are true employees of the BNDD and, although all administrative details relative to their employment are handled within the Agency,' they' are: unaware of any Agency involvement.

4. It is ~eltat this time that a reaffirmation of our support
to BNDD in Project TWO-FOLD is necessary and desirable.

5. Therefore, itis recommended that. appr-oval, be granted for the continuation of Project TWO-FOLD.as originally approved by the Director of Central Intelligence on 12 February 1971.

~,9~~

Directoroa;:rity 00056

~I


. ° E ( '-'y" ......···1·


'-:
SUBJ.ECT: Project TWO-FOLD
APPROVED:
0"
>

------=---------..,----..,----
DISAPPROVED:---------

Di stribution: Orig. - Return to OS
1 - ER
1 - IG

*.0

Per Mr. Colby's recommendation and DCI concurrence, terminatepara~raph 2 activity and continue paragraph 3 only as the -activity pertains to foreign assignments to collect narcotics intelligence abroad. Copy furnished IG.

00057
r:J

-I' _. J . -IJ ~ .._- ..·l - --.-._ .~. - _.-,. _ ~--_ _.__... -~. . ..- _, ~ '~ ",.-'.-... _ (;'.lY 1.1 .. it.l \~.,. ,. ,~r


..
ROUrfNG AND RECORD $HEET L _: . .... ;
J-----.---.----- ....------..----------------.--------.-------....,_."'--'
SUBJECT: (Op!;onoll

.__......_-----.-._. '.._._ ....--.._-----_...._-_.__.... -----..,.-.-._. -----_._._._---...._FROM: EXTtt~S'ON NO.


-00 _ ..._._. • • _._ ....--_. _
DATE
1-_..!=========::!'-

TO: (Officer d.';9MHon, 'Dam number, and building)
"r" f--__fl~::....:o.;M..::..a_<..y_"1:...:9...;;.7..;:3 -..,

DATE ___.__.._ r ......- .____ OffICER'S

RECEIVED
COMMENTS (Number each comment 10 show I,om whom
INITIALS to whom. Draw a line aero.. column after each comment.)
FQ&WA~DED

J----------------.-----t--+------+----+----------------------11.
Broe
-----------_._----_._- ------+--_.+----~

00058


ro.R¥.3~ 6.1"1 Oiu'S!:PREVIOUS 'tor' S;~ET oCONFIDENTIAL oINTERNAL oUNCLASSIFIED~.r<i2.... :i ." ,.... :EOITIONS ~ . • USE ONLY.. ....
MORT DocTD: 1451843
i ,.., "".
. .
'.' . . .,~'May 1973
.,
'j
:

=!

.l.:.

f
j

1 j
_c. t: -i


I

I

1

'.

.:. ::1
'.;::~!
MEMORANDUM FOR "THE RECORD
" ..
SUBJECT: .G~neral: ..Office ofSecurity Surv.ey
. ·1
.
,.
.."..
'...
-:--......-:--: -:-."--:;.~."-:-:::-.",--:-",--:.. .
;':,. . "'" ..'f"···· •.. - ..' .'::'. ".". '.
~'.--:-~~---. .. ., .

1. At the Director's instruction, and with the concurrence .. of the thenDD/P, the Office ofSecurity devedopedInfozmanrs in : ".:::~:...
RID to report on the activities of RID er.q.ployees on whom security .. :':'~ questions had arisen.... This program, which included upwards of a ... ·· .' dozen informants at its peak, has declined to its present level.of three, only one of whom is reporting regularly on matters of~urrent . interest. .':': .~; ....:/..,~~;".:., '. ; ..' . :':'''' '.:. :':'>. '. . .. , ....

'0 ":'.' "'.: •• _. '..._ ••~.. ,:;.......:•••~:• :,••• _~.~,. ";' .' ••••• /~". -",

Z. 'The principal object of Security's interest.through this .~~.-"":" informant is a female who was em.ployedin RID for..a nu.mber oi'yea:r's . until she r·esigned in 1969. Her r~s~gn?Ltioncoincid~dwith the iniq.ation of a security review on her by the Office ofSecurity, butSecurity does .not know whether the e:m.ploy~~waa aware of tbis..~:eC:~t.Y review Jat.,",:.: '.'

the tUne o_~berr~Si;:::on•.'.,,, ~:'~~':r~.;~~~:~:~,;;--:.:+:F'


. 3. Security' s interest in this em..ploye~was··occasionedby,. '" ... : reports that she had developed anincreasing~yin'f::iixiate a.cquaintance,.,.;:>.:: with

a Cuban na.tional.
.Reporting.
by

one in.form.ant~ who Was

..

also.~;·.;·¥":;;:~:· . j;be~g de:elope~ bY.the-·~~b~; suggested that.the·~.uban·migh~h~~e::~;~:~·::),L~;.:.·,.


an mtelli'gence lIlteres~.lD.the fem.al~.~.T~e.s~.~.~~~mant·a~so.;,.s.ub ~.;·~kY: .' ..",

·:~~:!...;.,... .•,:~; .• sequently reported that.the Cuban had nl.J:l?3.eroq,s·other:contacts aInong . ;:., ," ".


:';~~}~; ;::_;~::;;~;;t:;;::~e;;:::::~;~:;:C:::::~~~iP~!~Wilf~~~:_

._..:: ';'. . .·employee entered'into a common-Law :maritalrelc:tion~hip"with.~he~
;. • • • • .1" ";.:':. • • '" ,_. '... ,. •••• .... :"

..,..~;:: ~.-::;::'~;'. '::.•:.::...' ••..,,:.·.:c: ..4.::,'.Subsequent~:to.herdeparturelrom the. Agency,'" the ex-IUD -..1':;:;'''';';,'.;.:.


.c.:.'. . .. . ".~~.".''':.' . . :.... . . ~... . r '•• " .• ":, .. 1',:" ;¥"';

· '.' :-<. Cuban andjo~ned hini·a'S.parbier in' a. photographic..·b·usiiess.<. :r.n thi~:·';;':i':~:C··.", ~... ·.·.1 ~ t :r.,,:';


->, .,: -.. .capacity.she s.oli.cite~.busin~ss..~mong ·CfA~:t;lployees; ·"especi.ally; ;i.~'-";·~·:·:::·; ::.....:.'
· ~i ..I'·', .:.those requi;ring'p<:tssport photos.:.,'Recently, $he 'and the' Cubansought':-.;·;:;<.
:.~
'f ..:..;. .
t.o eznp.loy
• • .\. '! • ! " ". . '.. .'~I' •• ' .,
Security~sinforman~in. this busine;ss 'on·a.part-tim.e b.asis; ';....:.~:~ ..

-:_~'" .'~~~.·.~_~.,~"~,-:..,.~.~_:.:.1,·.: .::.:..~.~...~;'· '., ~..;'':..:".'.'::.·.;:.~E;;:t.;.;.~.·.':[:~:~..· :._.·::.~.,~.;.:.'.;.:.·~.::.~.··-:;'•..:.-t:.::.:.~.·.:_'.".~.;.i.::>:~:.;:.'.,~O:.~.__ :."'.t.';_i';~.l.~-·~.;:~·':~••:~•••'li::~;~":
~- ':., - .": ~~.. .... ~ :. ~ '... , ~-. 'SECa":.' ...:. ~~:."'..;:....:-:.


;.~ ...... .'..... '. -, ".' :; .•:.,~-':::;>;;~~.;), .--".",,:~,

-~-~~;.',.,.:_: ·:::;"i~~~·t~~;¢~i~1~:~i:i12~:~;;~~~h;i:~~t:.,.c~~rJff~:;.:~,., ...::


MORl DoclD: 1451843

.
'. yJ(


5. Inforrnation on the background of the Cuban is fairly ex!cnsive , but it is inconclusive. He is known to have been a rncrn.ber of antiCastro organizations in this country, There are also reports that his' rnother was impr i soned in Cuba at one time, There are other episodes ·in his life that suggest intelligence Involvernent all. his part with some hostile service, but this is not yet definitely establi.shed.
6. The Office of Security has had at times a second informant in this case. His reporting has tended to confir m reporting by the principal informant, 8. The Offide of Security has been running this operation for over two years, in an effort to obtain conclusive proof of its intelligence nature. CI Staff has been kept informed.. The FBI, which was informed of the case at an early stage, has declined to take responsibility for it, on grounds that it concerns CIA's internal security. As a result, the Office ofSecurity has been inhihited in the actions it can take against the:Cuban susp-ect. On the other hand, Security has not taken any action against Agency em.ployees for fear of comprornising the operation. 9. It would appear to me that the, Office of Security has dallied with this case long enough. Apparently unable through positive measures to resolve doubts about the case, O/S has followed the course of watchful waiting, hoping the Cuban would take precipitaifaction himself that would give us the evidence we seek. In the m.eantim.e, our knowledge of the relationship between the Cuban and the several other current Agency employees with whom he is known to have contact continues

- 2
..
00060
.,',
~

~~-----------_.

MORl DoclD: 1451843
,
."'r.....~.\ .

The possibility that the employee.In t)J:) DIVISIon may oe passIng information on CIA's Soviet operations is too great to warrant further delavin moving against her. I I

.3 ... ;;:zr00061.


MORI DocID: 1451843
. "' ....

Hemorandum to:

Subject: Offj.ce of Security Survey - Office of Security Support to B~DD 1. In D~cember 1970 Robert Ingersoll, head of the Bureau of ~arcotics and Dangerous Drugs, asked Hr. Helnis if the Agency could give him scir:-e assist.ance in shoring up the internal integrity of the BUDD. According to Ingersoll, the old Federal Bureau of Narcotics had been heavily infiltrated by dishcnest and corrupt <elements, ,~o were believed to have ties with the narcotics smuggling industry.
toh~lp him recruit some thoroughly reliable people Ingersoll w~nted us who could be used, .not only as special agents in his various office~ arotmd the country, but also to serve as informants on the other BNDD employees in these offices.

62 ...

. ,
/ ..~-.. ;... --: ..... .'
~. "'"

JOLawrence

00063

r'

----_.


SUBJECT: (Optional)

[J CO.. DtJHIf:\l oSECRET
/"""" ._-------.. ---_.
-_. ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET

FROM, .._--_.__._--_.-._---'--_:'----'---._--_.' _._--_._----.-_.-.-----._--_.-.EXTENSION· NO.


Howard J. Osborn
Director of Security
----------------------
D"TE
I I 9 May 1973.'
TO,
._-~
(Offiter
desJgflolion.
room

I

number, and buildin!!l DATE

-
OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment 10 show from whom
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
INITIALS to whom. Oro .... 0 tine octose column after eoch comment.}

._--
l. Deputy Director for
Mariagement & Service'
2.
I
---,..
3.~c;

,\ ......--
4. '-"r

5.
6.
7.
8." ., ..

--;..-::: ;;"_-r::..;;..' '-_._-".......

_. ...... - 9.
10.
11.
12.

13.
14.
-
15.

ADMIN 00064
FORM 610 USE PREVIOUS 0


. '. -.....
JIll'

SECRET-.....' M...... ....,.. "0" .: ....- ..... _.~AlE ONLY 0UNCLASSIFIED_
" ..... '.' ". 0CONFI DENTIALI!J

3-62 EDITIONS
• _ • __._~.....""'i,.."• .;;.........:.i:c...,I'W.._:.w....._~:.H::a.·.:

MORI DocID: 1451843
9 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: SUBJECT Deputy Director for Management &' Services

Press Allegations re Use of, Agency Polygraph

1. This

memorandum is fOT'youT information only and confirms a report I made to you by telephone earlier today.

2. On 22 July 1971, an article was carried on

American proposals relative to the SALT talks in The NewYork Times over the by-line of William Beecher. It was devastatingly accurate and contained direct quotes from a Presidential advisory memorandum the White House had sent to Mr. Gerard'Smith, Director, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, a few days. earlier. The President

was alleged to be furious with this unauthorized disclosure of classified information and directed a. sweeping investigation within the United States Government to

".
,
.

determine the source of the disclosure.. Investigation was conducted under the. di.r,ectton. .. Q~. Mr. Egil Krogh and Mr. David Young, Staff Assistanf~fo·Mr. John Ehr1ichman,

Counsel to the President for Domestic Affairs.

3. On the basis of investigations conduc~ed by State Security and Defense officials,' four'Tndividuals-"'one individual in the Department of Defense and three individuals in the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency-were tabbed as leading suspects. Mr. Egil Krogh contacted me on 26 July 1971 and requested' that we arrange to polygraph

the three suspects in the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency and volunteered the information that the Federal Bureau of Investigation would be asked to polygraph the. one suspect in the Department of Defense.

0-0065
, I ~ •• \; ,:\ 11
JJ( bi~Lf

4. I informed Mr. Krogh that from time to time in matters involving the national security the Agency had detailed to Mr. G. Marvin Gentile~ Director of State, Security. a polygraph operator and a polygraph machine for his use in polygraphing State Department employees '~10 were recipients of allegations concerning their loyalty. I emphasized that this procedure had the Director's approval and that State 'clearly understood that the examination was their total responsibility. I further informed him that this was the only way we could undertake to entertain his request and that even then it would require the specific approval of the Director. Mr. Krogh asked me to obtain such approval and work out such arrangements with Mr. Gentile.
s. Later that same day, Mr. Krogh called Mr. Gentile and inquired as to whether the arrangements had been made. Mr. Gentile indicated they had and suggested that the same ' polygraph operator'be used to examine the Defense suspect. Mr. Krogh informed Mr. Gentile that he considered this an excellent idea and that he, would instruct Defense officials to make their man available to Mr. Gentile for 'a polygraph, examination.

6 The' four individual~ werel

I The polygraph '--..e""x'""acwm"'1-:;:n....anl:=-=.1,....,o"'n""""'s==--"'r"""e=s.....l....-:r:.tl:'"'",e"""""1-:::n:----';c:'-:.tr:,e=a=r=1""'n=g=-~l:rn'""'e'--="":ro"'udr men and the
resu~ts of the examinations were forwarded over my signature to Mr. Gentile on 29 July 1971. memorandum is attached.A copy of my covering 7., Mr. Murrey Marder, Washington Post, in ,an article dated 3 September 197T, stated that a State Department spokesman had acknowledged at a news briefing that agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation had polygraphed State Department employees suspected of leaking information on ,the SALT talks in July•. Mr. John Edgar Hoover, then ,Director of the Federal

a staff writer for The
2

,SE ONLY

.
.r • (
'.

Bureau of Investigation, denied this allegation in a letter to The Washington Post and said that the polygraph examinations had been conducted by another agency. Speculation centered around the Agency, but after a day or 50 7press speculation in this regard died away_

-S. Mr. Marder apparently has never been satisfied

and has been pressing Mr. Charles BraY7 State Department spokesman, for confirmation of Agency involvement. Mr. Bray learned today that Mr. Marder plans to use a press conference to be held at 2:00 p.m. this afternoon to press this point further. Mr. Bray has been given guidance by Mr. Gentile to avoid confirmation but if this is impossible he will indicate the examinations were conducted by State Department Security officials utilizing an operator and a machine detailed to the Department for this purpose. I do not know whether or not the fact that the government-wide investigation was directed by Mr. Egil Krogh is known to Mr. Marder but I suspect that it is and that this is the reason why the matter has been raised again. Mr. David Young was instrumental in pushing my office to conduct an internal Agency investigation of this disclosure and the

·White House was satisfied that no Agency employee was

the source.

Directo.r
Attachment
00067

-'1C.... ...-- .. _._.~._.....-..- ....._.... -- .._.. '" .-...-.-.._.. j, " I .... '

o. c.


,...' ---.
.

::
' ...

. ''';:'

. '.' :'.~"

( -:'.:

I

1
-,
00068
--. .. .\ ..

'\
"........ .. "... ,.

:;'~:?",)i.:y ..~~$i·5t3.;1t, 5.ecret;::.ry
io: ::)~.c';..1=l~y
.-. -... ':0 ~".'_""o_i .:...:.-:-. ::::"':J_''':.;':.::::1.:':~_~;:-::'.~.L.~~_......... _~:..

'2.....:=~....::: !.:::t o;:£le.r c a s e-s i;n.~;nl-vl·2.:5 1::'1.2 1~3e o; P0~Y~;:"~?~.1' i::;'3
i=r:.Fi.~::.-ati7·e~":O I::£.:;:::~nce~:ernade to r~ls ";\:1.~.llCY'3 1:l:.:,::)1··:".::1::1:~·~t i::l
~:~~3e .actions,
3. 1\.5 you i;"?"il1 nota, the :L3?O~t.:J 3.Z"-:: not ~1.:::t3:;i£i.:;d :2::!.U I
3;"'..a11 de.f.er to jrao.:j~dJn:t~nti::l !'''e;ard to tb'~ l~·J~~i of cla':;3iiic~tio~.
- - "'" -.... --'" " = -. ;:....
...". ~.;).
..... ..-......

00069

5 June 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General

SUBJECT Items in John Clarke Mem oraridurn to the Director of Central Intelligence, dated 9 May 1973 I. Two items in the attached rnemorandurn had not previously been reported. The first: "_- Use of CIA funds and facilities to

for FBI and provision of technica equlpmen s or use against a l.-.. ----' 2. In a follow-up meeting with Mr. Clarke, he advised that involved here was the use of funds appropriatedfor CIA bein iven to the FBI in cashiers checks for the ur ose of

There was also gency help given in Further, other CIA~cashiers checks were given to NSAwho. with

I

some ssistance, was working onI

Mr. Clarke said he thought the only problem here was in the use of funds, not in the operation. He thought the only source of additional information on this subject was Mr.1 lof the DDO/CI Staff. . 3. The second item: "_- Use of CIA funds to help State Department defer Presidential representational expenses of President Lyndon B. Johnson's trip to Southeast Asia. II

not agree to this amount. The Director did supply funds in thos e instances where some operational activity was involved or

could be inferred, I, e , , I


"...JI Mr. C larkL.e-w-a-s-n-o""t-s-u-r-e-o'f:-;-;th;---e-a-m-o-u-n--;t-o"f-A"'--:-g=-e-n-c-y-

4. Mr. Clarke said the total amount of TIlOney requested
by State Department was $3, 000, 000 but that the Director would
00070

[YES QNt¥

S[CRET

MORl DoclD: l45l843

funds used. He felt that only Colonel White could" supply adrlitional details. He said Senator Russell and Representative Mahon were advised of this Agency activity but asked not to be briefed in detail.

Inspector
Attachmen t
00071.
..../
\:
__ J ..._A "-; I._I.
9 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Director of Central Intelligence
SUBJECT
Per your instructions

1. I have no recollection of specific contacts with the Ellsberg case, Watergate, or Young. Dick Helms' instructions at the time regarding discussion of Hunt's previous employment s hou'[d be a matter of record. 2. Other activities of the Agency which could at some point raise public questions should they be exposed and on which Bill Colby is fully conversant are:

-CI activftyof Dick Ober 3 DO/D.

j

I.,

Iinvestments and

accumulation of Government capital.

Use of CIA funds and facilities to acquire U. S.
real estate for FBI and provision of technical
Iequipments by NSAI por use against

.t'

Use of CIA funds to help State Department deferv',

Presidential representational expenses of L. B. J . ./'Ytrip toSEA.. G
f~....-----..--\L.-__ dhn M. Clarke


0007Z
5 June 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General

SUBJECT IteIns in John Clarke Mem or-aridurn to the Director of Central Intelligence, dated 9 May 1973 1. Two items in the attached memorandum had not previously been reported. The first:It__ Use of CIA funds and facilities to acquire U.S. real estate for FBI and pro
vis~on of technical equipments by NSAS ~or use

againat a ',-__ _

Z. In a follow-up meeting withMr~ Clarke, he advised that involved here was the use of funds appropriatedfor CIA belo iven to the FBI in cashiers checks for the purpose of

\ '11ere was also I

L..-_.------.
\ Further, other
~_

CIA monies in cashiers chec s were given to NSA who, with some~Ssistance,was working onl . '.

Mr. Clarke said he thought the only problem here wastnte.use of funds, not in the operation. He thought the only source of additional inforxnation on this subject was

Mr.

I p£

the DDO/CI Staff.

3. The second item: "-- Use of CIA funds to help State Department defer Presidential representational expenses of President Lyndon B. Johnson's trip to Southeast Asia. n 4. Mr. ·Clarke said the total amount of money requested by State Department was $3,000,000 but that the Director would not agree to this amount. The Director did supply funds in those £nstanceswhere some operational activity :vas involved or

Icould be inferred, i. e•• 1 IMr. Clark-e-w-a-.s-n-o-t'--s-u-r-e-o"'f the amount of Agency

00073

">".

funds used. He felt that only Colonel 'White could supply
j additional details. He said Senator ~ussell and Repre

I

Isentative Mahon were advised of this Agency activity but asked not to be briefed in detail.

Ii


IJ.nspector
.
I
I

i

i IIf

f

IIII


Attachmmt
I

i!r i II

I
Ii' '."
- 2
I00074
MORl DoclD: l451843

LJ

.,,

rt:,i:Al LJ(llN IL~f! t:.L - r
I 1 :.H:(L',SSlfiEO_... _._--_._....__..__..-------.......- ......-....._-- -_.-< ..------.-_._---;~H


...

_------

X
........ 1"'0 ..ROUTlNG AND RECORD SHEET
SUSJECT: (Optional) "

_._._

..
----_._-
----._,-
----
..
--_

.... ..

---
-"--"-'
---_
..
-NO.

f----------.._---- .....
fROM: E).!ENSION

D.irector of Finance

1212 Key Building I


TO: (Ollicer design02fion, 'oom number, and .- buildingl DATE
r--OFfICER'S

RECEIVED FORWARDEDINITIALS
DATE - ,. ---""'-'--'-----
7~1973

COMMENTS (Numbe, each comment '0 d.ow (,am whom
10 whom. Drow a line acron column afler each cemrnent.]

1. Deputy Director. for

Mana ement &Services

~.~

3. .--
-
4. Director of Central Inte 1igence

I IHeadquart€rs


5.
6. ... ..
7.

8. .

-
9.
10... ,

. .. ... ..

.'
.

0> I

I ,

11.
12.
~."
.
..-, ...0 :
13.
I1.4. .' - .. - : :" , ..;.:. .' 0.":'. ............0>

f 15. .'

0 "

.'

..

.
:
-,

0
-.11
i~fF8a.. " ....... .., ~
liG0
..
.,..
..

.v: .... . '"

-
"
. ,. v-,~}
..
-.
.
....... .,
.. ...

.....
.":
~.~
". .. .- ,0
, "'
..
_~;
.'
:.~
.
;
,
..:~
-,
:

..
:._

.
"
..'-c~~: ..

,-'
.. ..
p:·I'.rl'i'i
.

~,..

..~

~;

r
" 00075:..';';4 • ..tt-'~~ ~i';:~i:s " '"- ':.,c.· .. .. ~::"


: : ..*...... .... ..... .~ ....,

MORl DoclD: IIIIIIIIIIIIIII

1451843
-;"
'.
.~?s:
..
;
MORl DoclD: l45l843
'..
orl MAY 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: VIA FROM SUBJECT Director·of Central Intelligence Deputy Director for Management and Services Director of Finance Special Other Government Agency Activities

1. I
IColonel White, Executive Director
r---_--'2~.'--1,-------...:....---------------=--..:
. 3. Detailees - The Agency has reimbursable and non
reimbursable agreements with the White House, Department of
Justice, Defense'Agencies, etc., based on signed memoranda
between the Director 'of Personnel and the various Agencies.

4..pro~ect TWOFOLD - Reimbursement from Bureau of Narco.tics an Dangerous Drugs' for ·training of BNDD agents bya domestic Agency Security proprietary.

5. I

l...-----I]

00077
,! ......
- 2 -
SUBJECT: Special Other Government Agency Activities

6. Payment to White House - Reimbursement to White House as approved by Executive Director-Comptroller for $33,655.68 representing cost of postage, stationery and addressing of replies to letters and telegrarn~'received by the White House as a result of the President's speech on Cambodia in May 1970.'

Ie inance

00078
; .-.'. ..' ...i": -'. . . '::. '~."'::<:::':.::'.,::';'~'g~"
4

. ." '0'1 MAY i373



. .
. J.{Ej·l0r~'mm,1 FOR: Diroctor of Ce~tr~l Intclli~cncc
VIA Deputy Director for Ha:l<li:e::l.Cnt and•
: Director of Financ~ '.
.~
~.

\ ;:..,
.• .,.,.:.1" .'., .:~_
.........._~.... 1...••~•.,
'.

2. IL~


-,. "

~ ~3. Detailees - 'Tho Agency 'has reimbursable anu'non
rel~btirsablc a:;rcc:ncnts \-lit!l the i'lid.tc r:ouse, Dc~)nrt;:lcnt of

Justice, :;~fe~sc Agcnci es , etc, , based on si~~~led' r.i~;.~~r:m;,!abetween the Direcr.or of Personnel and .the various Agencies.
4. Projoct :r~JFtlL!) • Reimbur-sement; fron sur-eau of'· byNar.cotics---ailJ. Dangerous Drugs for traini:lg'of B;iDb agents
a do~estic Agency Security'propri~taI"y'~

s.

-L-_'-

...

.

s£Crrtl -,,=-~(1[\1...(l:\HV

• \ ~.
---'

-----_


...
_-.-_
..

----


--_._:,-_.-_.
--.

----_


........

__

.
.....,.-_
..
-

_ .. _._.,.._

..
:~
".:.'
.
_.," -
.:....
:-:.'
't ..:.
-...:..
- 2
SUBJECT: Special Other Government Agency Activities

6. Payment to White House - ReLmburs eracn t to \'fhite House as approved by Executive Director-COl:lptroller £or
$33.655.68 representing cost of postage, stationery and addressing of replies t~ letters and telegrams received
by the White House as a result of the President's speechon Cambodia in May 1970.

(signed) Thomas B. Yale
Thomas B. Yale
Director of Finance

..... Sf .00080


MORl DoclD: l45l843

I. 7::J.-;:\

~
f..;
'_'
!
.' i 'J

.,..•• -

I07 MAY 1973
~lEl·:QRA"iDU}.1 FOR:
VIA
FROt·!
SiJDJ!;CT

Director of Central Intolligenco Deputy Director for j·!anagemcnt and Services Director of rin~nce Special Other Government Al;ency Activities

I Colon0l l';hite. Lxecutive Director
2.

--------------------r3. Detailees - The Agency has reimbursable and nonreimbursable agreement s with the 11hite House. Depar-tment; ofJustice, Defense Agencies. etc•• based on signed memoranda


between the Director of'Personnel and the various ~gencies.

4.Pro~ect tWOFOLD Reimbursement from Bureau of Narcoticsan Dangerous Drugs for training of BNDD agents bya domestic Agency Security proprietary.

s. I


L--;_I~·,00081.


.. .


- 2 -
SUBJECT: Special Other Government Agency Activities
Iiouse

6. Payment; to White House - HeinburSGHcnt to h'hite
as apl)TQved by Executive Director-ColJptrollcr for $33,655.68 representing cost of postage, stationery and addressing of replies to letters and telegrams received
by the White House as a result'of the President's speech

on Cambodia in Mdy 1970.
(signed) Thomas B. Yale

Thomas B. Yale Director of Finance

,,
00082

p ." .u~~lA~SSI FI ED01lI~ --:IlAl


~---.
.
I

- ._----AND./ - ROUTING


SU8JECT: (Oplional)

[J

CONFI" ''lTIAl

-. ~'ET -----~RECORD SHEET --.' .

._---_..... ----
FROM: *----.._--_.-,----_..'------.---
Deputy Director of Finance
1212 Key Building
'..''"0'....
room
"0';;'.
0""
l~~"TO: (Officer
building) -------
REalVED FORWARDED

1I .


2. ~ IHea4quar t er J,s__J3. "'--


4.
5.
6...

EY.T~NSION·rNQ."-------···-------·----··_-

I IIIWE'-'-~'-';--'-.


24 May 1973~

OFFICER'S INITIALS COMMENTS (Number each comment '0 ,how from whom
10 whom, Draw a line
.ocross column af'er each comment.)

,.\\

Attached are pertinent
documents and papers r eLat mj to Para 6 of the Director of Finance I S memo to the DCI
dated 7 May 1973, Subject: "Special Other Government

- Agency Activitiestl
7.
8.. .-

I I

Warren D. MagnussoI

9,
10....
n.
.
......
'.'- : ..
:-..
-.
.,' .'
.-.: "
.. . ..
~
,

12. .. -: ~~....··':/t~. ·~~~~2"::i:i~.:~ ~ ~:"'..:: -;';.
Atts
-
.

.
.,. . ...

"
.
.' ...'
-,
'.

.' .'... ........-; ':.;.

13.
.
.
-
~".
. .. : .. '. '. ...::.. ~. ...... - . ..... ..., ~; :-I;-:::.~:'..':.. :.:..-::::...'~.'.14. ..; . :
: ::...~ :.; ..
..",
t.
, "'": ." ."..' - ..' ..':;:}" ~\: ~~:;.:i.. - r' ~~"";: .~:~':,~?~.:~~.: ~..:;~>.-;</i>;:~. ·~·Z ~~":'.~}".". \~~;~~~:. ~:i~}~?~;.

15. -, " .. . " / ~\:7~~::. t.r;;~'~n""'f1J"1T .-:-" .
-;:" ,. :. ''''''000803';;:'


\<
.,r , ..

,
"
t.; .'

r!!~~':I - .- : ...;." .::.:......": .. '..•-~" \1 '.

..

'.' : ..' .~-/~~:~~g~~ ;'~~1~!j: .~~. ~~~o .'~10 u~Jft~v~~us r7t'.' . 0 CONFIDENTiAl ~ D' INTERNAL :,' . D'-' U·NCLASSI.FIED·?:~;':.~.


..~~~~,..:~:'t~,; .;-:.i.:~~"._~·.::,:~~LL;l;...:.c"":::~...;i;~:2>,,:;;-;~U?;~!'it-~:.~t;i:.~."'"_; ....,:.,.,,'~~~:;;~~~I:~<·~,~:..r~V~~1~2:~~~t.~i\·dt

'.' ..'.'/ ,.


/

141'. Nagnusson' s phone conversatzlon ,'lith ;.~r. John Brown at approxfmat.e.Iy 10: 20
on 26 May 19'10:

13: Guess we're back together again! M: Got more problems? B: Yes, don't know how much Watts told you. M: I didn't talk to Watts. Think he called Colonel vJhite.

B: Let me explain background. As a result of the Cali'lbodia speech, we Ire getting relatively inundated with correspondence and normally all of this is sent to the Department of state for answering. What we're

doing -- we're continuing to sen~l1._c..2.!:~co:r.r_e_i:!pg!!.cl.~!!£~_t.9.~at~ However, the President made, determination he'd like to answer support over his signat~re here and 'we asked the Department of state to support us on this effort. They're in' a position wnere they can provide only limited support at this time. They're committed for $10,000 which would probably handle' in the area of maybe 60;00~r~_~ponses.' -

M: How many responses altogether counting pros and cons?
B: The cons are quite a large group tha~ they're handling themselves also.
M: Are they going to be handling pros too?

B: ....>-$.10J ..J?r_o.s-=- They're doing cons. On pros they c~n pick up only 0Q'?2:.s .J'~:r: ~10,000 wort1i-;-We estimate it will be arounCL~&g.Q....~E50,~d it looks like at present time we've got over 100,000 responses in and it could go upwards of -150,000 or greater. Looks like we'll need a minimum.
of another $l(),c)6o;:p:rotra01.yrnareaoF $15,000z additional. This covers cost of printing,:postage and addressing:'

M: Just printing, postage and addressing? Not any overtime for any salaries or anything like that? 13: No, the posting of the things we'll do ourselves -- by hand. No problem. We're talking about physical costs of job _..:. cost of stamps, cost of envelopes and cards, and cost of having them 'addressed by outside firm. We'll handle putting stalllp on, inserting, and sealing and mailing. Only talking about cost associated with three aspects of the operation.

M: Postage, address~ng and printing.
C'

B: Yes, reason I asked NS/f. to see if they could arrange -- depending on how volume goes -- probably another §?10,000 to £],000... _

M: T.i;l.ese are just pros? state is handling all cons themselves?
(continued)
00084
I • _ ...

e ,

.

I
, -, .. ~ .... .
Messrs. Magnusson and Bl'OiVU (continued - Page 2)

B: Yes, this is just portion of pros we're talking about. My understanding get in touch -,d.th you to vlOrk out mechahics O!~ how we woul.d l1cuid.le the .billing to make sure it's straight and we do i t properly so it fits in with your accounting system.

M: This is only portion o:f pros. State doing some too?

i B: Th~~re~QD~'ibuting~~lO.OOO to the pros as well as doing all the C~S. They're picking up quite a load as a 1~t-ofth1S:-0neh-eu of a lot of response c~ning in on this. M: Bound to be. Tell you, John, let me give you a call back later today if I may. Have to take a look about where I would fit this stuff in. Al'e you going to be in this afternoon?

B: I'll be around.
as I come back.
1f I'm not in my of:fice I'll get back to you as soon
M: I'll give you a call then.

B: Can't be real definite -- not sure how we're going to peak out. Not sure what backlog is. I'll check into that so When we talk this afternoon I can be little more def'inite. Probably run into that are~,I think.

M: Okay, 1 111 get back in touch'with you.
B: Okay, thank you, Warren.
, End of Conversation
00085
I .; !.. ,.'., - ..~ ~
-' ,J •
Nr. Magnusson's phone conversation with Col. vJhite at 15: 40 on 26 Hay 1970:

M: I talked 'vith John Brown today and it seems like -- as you mentioned -as' a result of Ca:rnbodia, inquiries going 'into 1'r'11ite House. The state Depar'tmerrt is doing 'all the work on the, cons -- there are pros and cons. The state Department is going to answer all the cons and the President has determined that he warrts to answer personally all the pros. However, the state has agreed to pick up some of those too in the amount of $10,000. That. will cover maybe 60,000 of' the arrswez-s, They estimate there I s going to be from 100,000 to 150,000 answers that will have to be put out by the lvnite House. Estimate it's going to cost about $8,000 per 50,000. Think it might go to 150,000. $10,000 to $15,000 additional which the White House will have to pay for. The charges are only going to be. for printing, postage and addr-easd.ng by an outside firm. No salaries for overtime or anything like that. They're going to lick the stamps in the 1voite House, paste the stamps on and insert the message into the envelopes. John Brown said he had requested NSC to see if t.hey could arrange, . presUDlably with us, I guess, for another $10,000 to $15,000 depending on volume. He was tailing as more or less foregone conclusion we would do it. I made no commitment. Told him I'd look into it.

W: How would we do this?

M: We would do it by asking them to pay amount and then send over 1080 to us with bill for the postage, bill for the addressing of the envelopes and bill for the printing' accompanying this and we woul.d just send check back. They would send short memorandum lvith it certifying these are thecharges. . . .

W: I think we want to know what we spend our money for but I 'don't think we want tlfe public records to' show'that we paid for it. M: What we can do, Sir -- I can ask them to send over a 1080 with certification that these are the charges for classified services per our conversation, and if you're willing to take that we can certainly do it that way.

W: Will this be an outside firm? CouIdn't we just pay the firm? What would .be better? 1 1m not sure. M: I think a short memo just saying attached 1080 is for charges previously agreed to between this Agency and themselves and that's all and then we send them.check for that. otherwise, there's always chance that an outside firm might rea1:ize it was us paying for i t ~. W: I guess it I s the best way to do it. I'd like to have in our records -nobody else has 'access to -- exactly what it was for -- all about it; their records, which are audited by the General Accounting Office, as'

little as possible.

(continued)
00086
Mr. l'1a;gnusson and Col. vrnite (continued Page 2)

. M: Think I can taJ.k to them and arrange that so he just sends unclassified 1080•. W: Go ahead and do it. I'll have to sign off on it, I suppose. You go ahead and arrange it in way that will give us full record. As far as any records of their's are concerned, I would prefer to have minimtun.

M: I can write memo and John Brown can refer to this and our phone conversation in a memo accompanying the 1080.

W: Okay, go ahead and do it. Put limit on it. vlhen they talked to me they said $10,000.

M: He said $10,000 to $15,000 because they're just pouring in. Might run above $10,000.

W: Approximately $10,000 but in no case will 'it exceed $15,000 something
like that. . Okay. .
M: All right, Sir.
W: Thank you, Warren.
End of Conversation
/t-/11

r ",·f b7


00087

.. ,: ...... \ :i'. '


~ :. ~.~) ..: ;..,

gr. 1-1agnusson' s phone conversation with Kr. John Brown at approximately 17:00 on 26 May 1970:

M: Think we can go ahead and do this. Have'to be careful as to way this is documented -- that I s the only thing. Would like to suggest that I ivrite memo for the record -- kind of co-sign it -- agreeing to amount and so forth and the vlay vie do this. Memo would have in it what it I S for and then you wou.Id send us a 1080 for this, referencing this memo
an~ our conversation.

B: You're thinking in terms of reimbursing us aga.i.n? i'iouldn't it be better for us to have direct charge ~o you? M: No, because of public record. In order to have all the things in our hands. It wouldn't look good for us to pay the bills direct for this sort of thing.

B: It would not? M: No, if you people pay the bills

B: (interrupting) Even to pay a large postage fee? Bulk of expense will be postage.

M: Bub we have to document what it's for if you people can just pay it, . then we'll give you money for. it.

B: What would our memo say? M: Say attached is 1080 referencing memo dated such and such. B: .What does the memo say -- that we're making reference to? .. M: I'll write that up and bring over to you. B: What, basically, are we going to say'it's about? .

M: .Have $10,000 with limit of $15,000 and would be for printing, of these' things and so on..

B: Just wondering if you have direct biliing it seems to me that serves purpose of memorandum. M: The direct billing from, let's say, the printer, the addressograph company or something like that, to us might raise questions ?utside and I think powers that be don't want to have fact that weIre paying for this sort Qf thing anyplace where it can be dug up. Easiest and cleanest way to do this is you people go ahead and pay and we'11
rei~burse you immediately.

B: Do we have to have this memo?
(continued)

00088tb". --- I


L
.
i.. -'1
~
'
.

." Messrs. Magnusson and Brown (continued - Page 2) M: I'd keep in rr~ safe here.

B: vlouldn Itit be adequate to send 1080?

M: Don't forget, you people keep copies of 1080's -- you have to by law. 1080·would have to cite what billing is for because of that, then that would open up to GAO or somebody else as to who I spaying for this sort of thing. .

B: 1ve have to cite what, it's for?

M: Let I s say it's "XYZ Printing Company" and you pay bill. This looks like you're paying it. You send us 1080 which says nothing and we give you money for this. We ourse.Ives have to have on our records what we're paying for for our 01-vn ~uditors which doesn't get outside of our Agency.

B: It's for your internal auditors? It wou.ld' not ~et outside? Okay, that sounds all right.

M: Illl draw the memo up and bring it over there and you can see it. B: That sounds good, Warren. M: Would next Monday be all righ:t with that memo? B: Yes, we'll go ahead and order. M: You can get going and so on.

B: DonIt know what final cost is going to be. Hate to restrict ourselves. We figure total cost is going to be around $25,000.. Got over 100,000 already that are just pro. 200,000 that havenIt been analyzed yet. Of 200,000· ·they estimate possibly upwards of 50,000 or 60,000 could pertain to Cambodia. Of the backlog of 200,000, 60,000 could be of .type that will be answered in this mailing. Our best estimate would be it. may run over. M: I Ive got instructions, John, to indicate in memo that it I S for approximately $10,000 but not to exceed $15,000. If· and when it exceeds $15,000, we'll start over again and 1'11 inquire further as to whether we can cover the other - okay?

B: Okay.
M: Open to negotiation if it runs higher.
(continued)
F;:~r-» • :
1.5"

00089
"'•• t

-~,~-----.~--

Messrs. Magnusson and Brown (continued - Page 3) B: It rr.ay run higher. If' 60,000 letters come out being pro, will taJ~e.~s ,to $26,000 or somewher-e in that vicinity.

M: Then II d have to go back and inquire to see if' powers that be will cover the other part. I think it's best to waitItil that happens,

B: Okay, good enough, '''nat time Monday?M: B:Wny don't you give us call here Monday? My secretary will line it ,up.

M: Okay.
B: Thank you', Warren.
End of' Conversation

--i:


Y
'::--';')
r
~-:.., ,.
\':
j . 7 '"'.

00090
MORI DocID: l45l843
\"'L:.I' .i~L., i,\j-j .:..,_;_iG._, ... \..-;::: hl:>..:.•.,..... I
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505
8 JUN ;970
MEMORAi'illl.jM FOR l'}fE RECORD

SUBJ"''&CT: Reimbursement to the White House £or Certain Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses
.L, Reference is made to the telephone conversataon between 14r. John Brown, Staff Secretary, Wnite House, and the undersigned concerning the accounting and the reimbursement procedure ~or \fl1ite House expenditures in connection with the printing, postage and addressing of replies to certain mail addressed to the President. 2. It was estimated and agreed that these expenditures would amount to approximately $10,000, but not exceed $l5,000, and the request for reimbursement to this Agency would. be based upon receipt o£ a memorandum categorizing the expenses.and certifying to their validity. The memorandum Will also transmit a Standard Form 1081
and copies of the vendors' invoices where applicable. 3. Upon receipt of the above memorandum, Standard Form 1081
and copies of vendors' invoices, a. U. S. Government Treasury check will be drawn and forwarded to the Wnite House.

~'-~-rr---------'

Deputy Dire·ctor for Liai'~on and Planning Office of Finance

CONCUR:

..

0009.1
MORl DoclD: l45l8~3

- -24 I~UG lQ/"


. v.u

SUBJECT:Re~nbursement to the ~fnite House for Certain Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses 1. On 18 August 1970,' the undersigned received a telepl10ne call from Mr. John Brown (145-2167) advising that the mailing had been heavier than anticipated (increased to 250,000 pieces) and that the dollar requirement for subject purpose had. increased from $15,000 to $25,000. 2. I apologetically advised 1'IJr. Brown that since our records showed that 'prior approval was limited to $15,000 I would have to advise and confirm with my superiors that the increase to $25,000' was acceptable, as I was sure it was.
3. In the absence of Col. White (on leave), Mr. Bush immediately contacted Mr. Clar.ke, r--l who was not in his office. On 19 August, Mr. Clarke telephonicaI:ty--approved the increased level and Mr. Brown was duly informed. .

Chief,

0009Z

l ~ I ... ) •
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON,
September 10, 1970'
Dear Vrr. V~gnusson:

Pursuant to your telephone call to V~. John Brown regarding the breakdown of costs in connection with the mailing of the Acknowledgement Cards concerning The President's Speech on T!1e Situation in Southeast Asia, the following costs were incurred:

Computer Marketing Industries, Inc.:I> Acknowledgement Cards Envelopes

12,746.15
3,185.07
. 1,,051.20
Total :I> 16,982.42
Sincerely yours,
Carson M. Howell .
Administrat~ve Officer

Mr.. Warren D. Magnusson Deputy Director for Liaison and Planning Office of Finance Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D. C.

00093

tlf.. .. f · MORl DoclD: 1451843



.

"
i:e::10l"i.:".~:I.-:.1 :~~).&.~ t:).:: ;\ ...~';(i:."'"(~) (i~....t..:::d.· 2'~ /.U.:;iJ.:. t l:./r,:,~
t::-\;a~ :-;1.':)~~ct
1. ki:;l;'v::hed h'.::ce-co is

i'tW m::l.iling exponncs,
"
2. It is l"Cc:':.t1CS.lc£:d t~l::~l; tIle' o7:."5.~:~naJ. voucher- be l1~l:r:ir~L:·i;:""~"~~i~i!,,'l.:tt!.10 <:'Y':;':L:i.~~bili".:.;:r oJ: i'u~::(J.G fli~u rctu:;'-IlCtl ~u')

r'l')l"ov-::d and ~~.~rt.i:rie(l ac ..co ~o;;lfi o:.:'.fica 'J::Ol" pC.yrr.ST!'{;.

;
i
"
I
I

tOl l!)!1=:) fi·or.1 I\!r. Ibi....ell

(ltd. 10of;cJ:?'~ 1970 f..Ii' 1001 (oris and 2)

i o~

I I.


;,J'....i....:.~..Jie• .1) • .l L LV. .~: ":'.\..'""f
DG]iu'~y Dircet:o:r 'fo....• Jsinif;Oil ,md :·l::.."·l1r.~or.rice: of' Fil'l:lm:e
00094
1 5 SEP :070
JV.iEMORAI\'DUM FOR:
Director of Planning, Progrmruning and Budgeting
SUBJECT

Reimbursement to the Vlhite House for Certain Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses

REFERENCE

Memorandum for the Record; dated 24 August 1970, same sUbJect

1. Attached hereto is accounting submitted from the Vlhit.e House for mailing expenses.
2. It is requested that the original voucher be administratively approved and certified as to the availability of fUnds and returned to this office for payment.

HARREN D. MAGIIJlJSSON Deputy Director for Liaison an lanning~ '.i,lOffice of Finance

Attachments Memo from Mr. Howell

dtd 10 Sept 1970
SF 1081 (orig and 2)

00095
MORI DocID: 1451843

" .


Sh'nl,iHI~: I'" 'r,u""r...o, lutil
7 I; \0 WIO V~LC:':;:fi '::.:~D SCHEDULE D. O. Xo..... ' . .__
1/'')·101-}0

'100 I'AID DY
\0 iSDUiSWi: OGJCCL (D. O. 0i'mbo!) .

You are authorized to effect tho withdrawals and credits indicated below,

-----L-,':Du'P.iI.:tl101rJriiSJ1SiilTl:&0'Omlllmcc:r -=o.m.......,"•.Jo~01L· -1


300
(D, O. Sj"llbol)
DEPARTMENT

.•.------~--_._-_.
DEl'AilTl.!ii:NT
Executive Office of the P....csi.

DI,;HEAU AnDRESS

nUiiltAU RlITi:RENCI: SU~UURY'

ArrllOPRIATION OR FIINO SnlBoL AIolOUNT
i Bunr..r..uI 11.;>;)1:1:88I

IBURE&l1 REFERENCE

I

II,.


The vrnite House Office 11-01-0001 Hashin!3t ont D. c. 20500--_..-- - - - - -

St;UiIAR\' :
ArPROrat.a.TION OR. Fusn S't"UBOL . A1l0UNT

1100110.001~a6t982•.
..

.

TOUL
TOT.LL sis,9(12.

Dctails of charges or reference to attached supporting documen~ For the printing of ACKnowledgment Cards~ Envelopes, and to Keypuncn names &acidl' and place on magnetic tape ana the preparation of heat transfer labels and affixi to envelopes, in connection with the acknowledging of mail concerning the" Preside speech on the Situation in Southeast Asia. For use of officebilled:
I certify F.\N

I certify that the
Paid by check No.

I I

For use of billing office:
FICATE OF OFFICE BILLED
iI.ellls llsterl herein arc correct and proper Corp,t"'UJ.t:JJ..k...LIJuw'-!o.!!!<""!ll!.Io!..!:.!!I!!.~:!.!!.!~v:.~!!i!..!~::!.!:._...,
(AUlhorized admlulstrativc or ccrlll)'iD~ olticer'
_ C/D :!\o. .dat!J0096
- ---

.. _.-. _

..
__

* u: s, GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE' 11161-607821
.
.._.~~ ~~ .._~_ __~._- -------".-

MORl DoclD: l451843

C"'i'· .~,,\.. I_....1.,.... .L :t

1. It j.n :l."(.':.1:::~r:~":·." ·~:·I.:-.t \-~ r...::-.---. iT~ ~.~' ..c; r.,::,':,:tc e,r ".ltJ,:·').;l.!iz:' ~~ ..
.
l~~~;..i:~;ll l\··::.,·~n'".~l·:; ~:I.) t.~i.0 ::e..:.·..:::.:.~l~'-· oi .~: ~: :.-·{.::...-:.d :··t,:-:~.t;:;..:1.·
2.
" IFAH

3. Isll (1oc·l:r.:G;-"l PC1xt ·;.·:',.:l in t.llis CJifica fo:..... soc..-.:,~·i:~:/·

CH.l!}i'(,orIl •
4. Flc~~~ fOl"'tiard. "th.::!
n?proD~~utc c~~iciaL.

'. .I

I


l·iC::;;DCOI;~·Il._
CG:j·::'~::i:"'=1::.':1': -::.;lir; tI':l~f~:1ct:Lon in 1)0'111:" ~",::""lL:
:i.'W~~~:::C;l:; t~:::l
iz ~~-lll~:i:r::;.)la to tl\c Ar'_~lCY
c11C':ck
office for
to
D:.;r:l:rt,~r
,'Po.
Kl\r:r.::::r D. l·:AGI-;U:':::',CCi
DiTcc.l,,-=>r :rc~ I'~uif;Ci"l r:r.d 7·J.rr:ni';~r:
00097
':;zt-.,..,.'
.~;.~••.:' -t::' ~.
••••••t......of..... ,••_~_.

...

!"

;
i.·~r.
John Drown

,S'L"U S~~cretal'Y The Y/liite Hou s o Office "!ushingt-on, D. C. 20500

"
z.--Enclosed is U. S. Treasury Check No.'1in the a rn our.t
of $16,982.42 which repi:cse:1tG rcii1-;bursemcnt of nUl"CaU Schedule

I No·IL__-.:..._I.copy enclose~./ThiS sC!lcdule wa9·.fo~·wardedto tilis


·1

10 September 1970. Your-s very truly,

.1JAHREN D. 'lv!.AUSSON
Enclosures

OFI ll Oct. 70)


·1---I

00098

MaRl DoclD: l45l843

e. ." THE WHITt: HOUSE WASHINGTON

Decem.ber 7. 1970
l'
CONFIDENTIAL
MEMORANDUM FOR: WARREN MAGNUSON

We have finally received the cost breakdown for acknowledging the mail in connection with the President1s speech on the situation in Southeast Asia. By copy of this InemOrandUlTI I am requesting our administrative office to forward that portion of the bill applicable to you.

If there are any p r obl.erns in handling this, please let me know.
Thank you.
.:::InA.
JOHN R. BROWN III
cc: .Carson Howell
00099
.....~...*- ._'-~".._'--. "~' -._.~....~_..~.
- ...... --- .~ ......_--~_.._.. __. ._

Keypunch names, place on magnetic tape prepare 'and affix to envelopes heat ' transfer labels, and furnish printout. $7,410.35
,Print acknowlecgment Cards 2,244.27
Print Envelopes. . 728.00
Postage 6,290.64· $16,673.26

-


.. .. . . .....-._--_..._.__.__.._-_ ...- ....._---_._-----~_ ...-- --.._------------_._---_.._-


-, """0'0._.__0_" '"_' _ _ ••. _ ••• " _ ._.__ •
MORI DocID: 1451843
5,'
/ '"

..

.~
I>iEJvJORAl'IDUM FOR:
Director of Planning, ?rogramming and Budgeting
SUBjECT
RE7iRENCE

Reimbursement to the wnite House for Certain Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses

Memorandum for the Record, dated 24 August 1970, same subject 1. Attached hereto is the second acc0U11ting, in the amount of $16,673.26, submitted from the vfnite House for mailing expenses..
Ciieck for the first accounting in the amourrt of $16,982.42 was forwarded to the White House on 2 October 1970. 2. It is requested that the or'Lgd.na.L voucher be administratively approved and certified as to the availability of funds and returned ~o this office for payment.

~ GN Deputy Director for Liaison

Planning Office of Finance

Attachments .

SF 1081 (orig &2 wiatt)

»<.

Memo from the White House

dated 7 Dec 1970 Memo to D/pPB, transmitting

- 1st accounting, dated 15 Sept 70

Copy of 1st 1081 Memo from the White House

dated 10 Sept 70

I 7/c:J,~

Memo for the Record dated 24 Aug 70

..:,.
-,
001.0.1.
_","0 ~ •••-.__ ~_. ~._••••• _ • 0 __ • _.. ••• __••••••_._ .~_•• __ • ~ •••_ ••• _ ••• _ •••
....." .' )"11.';' .'n. j(lhl

... :~t I JO·II-lt'~·U

\:~UGi":~.{ ;~.:·:ZJ SC;·,;::['~i..E D.O. No. ~ ._.usu C? W!TI-I;jRAV.'J::S .~i\D GREDlrS
n«. No. --.--·-t(}:·~::::J.;i!i~:i;-·
au. No. 3: -~.j..
-·---CiJ:r;;~~(:n:;;;
)I).) PAID BY(D. o.•;;·."bo)

You are authorized to e/Teet tho withdrawnls find credits indicated below,
300__._

(D. O. ~jllIl'lJ-o-J)---L


Dr.I' .....nTllENT Executavo (jf.,.·ice o.c blrc ."n::;L,
The ~';h'it,:! ilous e (;;.:.::.c';

1.L-01-0~)()1 Annneas

SumIAR"
.....rrnorRI...nON OR FUND SnlDOL APrRorRIATION OR'Fu"" SVltlJOL

110 11101100001 -,;16,6·...:;02/,


'j

I

i
TOTJ.L TOT4L

Deto.ils of charges or reference to attached supporting documents For the prtintdng of Aclm01'1lecigement Cares, Envelppes and PO;3tage f'oz- mnilin:,;, and to Keypunch names, place on magnetd.c t.ane, prepare and afl.·ix to envoLt.!)OS heat transfer LabeLa, and ;furnish'printout,9 in connection tvith· the .ad\.noW'led,~;:;.;'Ji... of mail concerning the President1s Second. speech on the Situatton in ::)ou"neast ;'.3iE See attached list ;for breakdoYI.n of cos~s~

-For use of officebllled: For use of billing office:

''1"~fy funds
j" • Cl);)E

ERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED

J cortif.)'thnt tho il.cms lister! hereln are correct and proper for payment from tho appropriation's) designated;


~, l,.-,Yi-U.:-O""'Ili-Cl:-rl---

I

Paid by check No. _ C/D ~o, •dated 001.02 _

I* u. S. GOVERNMENT pAINTING OFFICE: 1516\-60782\

I


IJ
...
..
,
"

1. it i6 l·cql.C~~"::~ ~~l;:~t a cllcc:~ 'il:" ~b.c ;·.r..nour.t 01 ~~lo, &73. 26 be dr-awn paynblc to the "Erc;::.;Ul"C:;: of t:1C t.r:'''iitcc~·Si;~tC5.

CuJCI _


3. .1\11 t1oC~·.1'lC~·r~2:~io).. c c ...icc~"~i~";.~; ~~ji:, tl.·:Lj::.~.;.~ctic,.n ia l~ci.. ·&; i;'I.:j ~ ~:'j thls olfice-fol" secu:....ity ~(12::;G:.10 c:=...d iz r,_"\'~il~blcto the t,~cjJ,-;~r ru.:.. ::..rJ:·~;.

4. Pl.cane £or\·~ard ti"~e' C}-iCC~-;' ~.o ·~:1.i::l o~ri.~e .for tr~nGn1it!;f.~itl:'; ·,i'l ap?l'opl"iate o':liciC:i.l.

OF1 _

00103
.' ...

Mr. John R. Drown III
St;l£[ ,S(c r ctary The "'{hite House Office W..•s hington, D. C. 20500

-, Enclosed is U. S .TTeasury Check No.1 fn the

amount of $16,673.26 which represents r eirnburscmcnt of Bureau Schedule No.Dcopy enclosed. Yours very t r ulv ,

I


Dt' If)ir~~t~r for Liaison and PI .nninn
Office of F'In.ince
Enclosures

I

l"-" . 001.04

., I '.' _.__.__..

- .• \' ;.')7)

MEMORANDUM FOR: SUBJECT Deputy Director for Management and Services Special Report 1. This memorandum is in re~ponse to a request to provide information on situations or associations that might appear to be irregular on the surface. 2. Details to the lVhite House and Government Agencies - Background: For many years the Central Inte-filgence.AgencY~as detailed employees to the immediate office of the White House per se and to components associated intimately with the immediate office of the President such as the Council on International Economic Policy and the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. We have furnished secretaries, clerical employees and certain professional employees on a reimbursable

and non-reimbursable basis. At the present time, we have noclericals or professionals assigned to the immediate White House office, but we do have one young man detailed to their Communications Section. There are detailees to PFIAB and CIEP. I might point out that we had detailed to the White House as late as the fall of 1970 couriers, telephone operators, a laborer assigned to the grounds and a graphics man who designed invitations for State dinn~rs. By October of 1970, more funds were apparently available to run the White House and most of our detailees were hired as bona fide White House employees. 'CIA is not the only Agency furnishing the White House with detailees. ·Levies have been made by this Administration and others on Defense and State and other Government entities whose employees have Top Secret cLeazances •

time

Professional officers have been and are at the present
assigned~ the National Security Council and we have seven clericals on detail to NSC on a reimbursable basis. In addition to the above, we have technical specialists detailed ,to NSA, an instructor at the National War College and security officers detailed to the Department of State to

001.05 .

-G-\
Q'~! I1-IIJ r.~~ ",''18."\___ 1.\, .. I


I ( I _J"",il-l.l~;:'

protect foreign visitors. Recently,Ilwas detailedto the Secretary of the Treasury alohg With. IO r other Agency
cmp'Loyees . We have cven, in rare insta.nces, detailed our people to Congressional Staffs for short periods of time. 3. petails to the White House and Governm~nt Agencies - Discussion: Details to NSC, the White House, NSA and the National War College are probably qu~te defensible. On the other hand, there may be those who would question Agency employees currently working at the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs and Mr. Peter Peterson having an Agency employee as·his . secretary when he was the .Secretary of Commerce (she also made a trip with him tb Moscow). She is still with him in his present assignment but we expect that she will report to NSC for

a new detail sometime this month.

r

Iserved for

over ten years as Director of the Offlce of PubI1C Safety for AID. This information has been kept "close to the vest" during that entire period of time. He has been approved for disability retirement and is presently on sick leave and will retire automatically at the expiration of this leave. Each detail of an Agency employee to the White House or other Government agency has been carefUlly considered and approval at a higher level obtained when professionals were involved.

4. Project TWOFOLD: I believe the support we areproviding to Project TWOFOLD is an activity that should be reported under your guidelines. Since this is an extremely sensitive Project and the Office of Security is reporting on it, I will not repeat the details in my memorandum. 5. Individuals Engaged in Domestic Activities: In a more general sense, Contract Personnel Division prepares and executes contracts with individuals engaged by the Agency to carry out domestic activities. We also process Staff Agents who are domestically assigned.noNone of these assignments are decided in OP. I really have way of knowing with any degree of certainty what the specific duties of these individuals will be.

I6.
00.10G
(

~\L
7. I


8. Hunt Requests a Lockpicker: This is a record of External Employment Assistance Branch's action,on a request from Howard Hunt for a lockpicker who might be retiri~g or resigning from the Agency. Sometime in the spring of 1972, Frank O'Malley of EEAB received a call from Howard Hunt who asked Frank if he had a retiree or resignee who was accomplished at picking'locks. Mr. O'Malley sent him a resume on Thomas Amato who retired 31 July 1971. Mr. O'Malley did not document his EEAB record

to show the date of this eichange, but I~who

also works in EEAB) opines that it occurred sometlme between March and May 1972. All of the above information was reported to the Office of Security on 4 October 1972 following the FBI's contact with the Agency regarding Howard Hunt. 9. Resume Sent to McCord~,Ik contract employee who retired in September 19/I, was a client of the
E~ternal Employment Assistance Branch in his search for a job after retirement. One of the leads given tol ras EEAB sent a Iesume to

James McCord's security business.

McCord, but I Iwas not hi~ed.

In mid-summer 1972,f Chicago. (He had a job there wlth a lead provided by EEAB, but until this telephone call he had

~telePhoned EEAB from
t e Hallfax Securlty Co.,
3

00107

·A'

not notified EEAB that he had the job and had moved from the D.C. area.) He said he had been. visited by a Special

Agent of the FBI who told

I

~hat his resume had been

Ifound

among McCord's papers. Ine :Agent wanted to know if

pad any connection with McCord.

I

Expla.ined

Ihow the resume got to McCord.

~el7P~lOne~ EEA~. I


os were notlfled lmmedlately.

After the Agent left him, lof OP andIlof

...:'

Harry B.Flsner Director of Personnel

4
001.08
MORl DoclD: l45l843

-_...._


._.. -..._-_ ...........--_.-_..... __...'......__....'" ..-- .---- ..._--_.__..__

-_


..........

-


......
-

ROUTfNG A~'~D RECORDSHEET__


.._.
._---
SUB.JECT: (OptiMol)----._---_. ,
.__.__._ .._ ...._ ..__._ ...___..__..__.._r__.___

--
Sensi t ive Activities Perfor.ned
.._--_._-~ --..._.-.~-_..._ ......-..._-
fROM:-
by the Office of Logistics•__• ____._._____ 0• __
-'-_.-_.._.. - r----- --

EXTENSION -_._.. -NO.


Director gf Logis!j.cs .

TO: (Officer designation, room number, and buildingI'---

DATE REceiVED FORWARDED
1.

Deputy Director·for Hanage

!j;c/ f]

II./. -


2. .-..-.... Iment and Services--_.-~_ ..

3. -------- ---

Director of Central Intelligence -4. f-.------------- ..------------DATE 14 MAY 19732551

OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number eoeh comment 10 s.how from whom
INITIALS 10. whom,

'f!/;.:~:


i_ ..,'---'
Draw a line acton column ofleor each comment)
-------

EYES ONLY


5.
6.
7.
8.
9.


10.c·, . 11.0
12.'.. : -

-,
13.
_.

14. .,.

- .. 00109·,15. - '. I 0. .LI .~~~ 610U5~Dr~~~~us D SECRET...;;..:;....0 .CONFID~NT,IA~... 0 ~~lE~N,ttv.:....:...~.~:;...... .._... .;L..,;,;,••~,.".:..::~::.._~,.....~~


.,' .,. '.
.-. , '.
1. _....:....._....-........"'. _. __ ~_...~~_ .... _....._. _:..:a..:-..:;..__ .••_~""'-I;;....::",...;4.:···_·;.:.3'J~;;c......~.:.::::·._J:::_;:.r.,;..
UNCLASSIFIED .
MORI DocID: 1451843
" ' " .!
14. MfW 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence THROUGH SUBJECT Deputy Director for Management and Services Sensitive Activities:'?erformed by the

Office of Logistic~
1.

This memorandum contains information for the Director of Central Intelligence. 2. This memorandum is submitted pursuant to advice given by the Deputy Director for Management and Services on 7 May that Office Directors report on activities, either under their cognizance or otherwise known to them, the nature of which could possibly need explanation or justification when viewed within the statutory responsibility and authority of the Director of Central Intelligence. The responsibilities of the Office of Logistics (OL) are such that in all matters herein reported, except two, the actions unde.rtaken were at the request of another Agency component. We have prepared a brief description of each action involved and then have included the name of the sponsoring component. The substantive reason for the requests for action by.this Office will have to be determined by inquiry to the designated sponsori~g component.

3. Facts pertaining to both actions undertaken at the initiative of this Office are as follows':

00:11.0

-i·l"t
-f¥fS


t.... {..Jl
tl..,.

'-'l-IL" - . UnI


SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of
Logistics
\Il T 1\ \/
CJCJ .VlvLf

~00:11.1.

SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

'the DD/O, we will not honor any requisition for surveillance equipment unless it has been approved by the CI Staff of the DD/O.

4. Within the,area of contractual responsibilities, the following items ara p~rtinent: ?:

a. In February 1971, Colonel L. K. \'fhite, the thenExecutive Director-Comptroller, called me to attend a
'meeting in his office, also attend~d by Mr. William Colby.

Colonel White explained that the Technical Services Division (TSD) had been requested to provide assistance to the FBI for a sensitive project designated I I(currently designatedl IColonel White did not dis
~lose the purpose of the asslstance bei~g provided by TSD

but did instruct me to assist TSD on purely contractual
matters. Since the Office of Logistics has no information

concern.irig the mission or purpose of ProjectI I substantive questions concerning the subject should be


addressed to TSD. Other procurement actions accomplished for the FBI are re orted below. Specific, ment i.on ,is made, however, of ecause of the dollar. magnitude, ap

proximately mll lon, ,and the complex technical equipment that h~s been involved in the undertaking.

b. The Procurement Division, OL~ currently has two requisitions in hand from TSD which would involve reimbursable sales ,to the FBI. One such requisition in the

,amount of $36,900 is for two Westinghouse television cameras. The second requisition in the amount of $11,200 is for two wide-angle surveillance probes manufactured by Bausch and Lomb. 'No action is being taken on either of

these requirements pending further' instructions which

. will be sought from the Deputy Director for Management and Services.

c. Over the years, this Agency has often supported
other Government agencies from a contractual or materiel
standpoint. Upon the. submission of an officially approved
request, supported by a transfer of funds, the Agency

would either enter into "accommodation procurements" for the requesting agency or support the requesting agency by the issuance'of'materiel from stock. Such actions are legally accomplished under the Economy Act of 1925. This
Ac~ authorizes one ~gency to support the needs of, or provide a service for, another Government ~gency when such

001.1.2
MORl DoclD: l45l843
.i" ~

~r"lJTTl:"t-t J[0


SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

action would be more economical and eliminate the need for one agency of the Government to duplicate facilities readily available from another. A typical example of this

procedure is purchasing photointerpretation gear for the

Defense Intelligence Agency element located at NPIC. In connection with the current repor;:.!:;ing requirement, however, I have had our records researched for tha past 2 years and

Attachment 1 reflects those transactions which appear to be relevant to the subject of this memorandum.

d. In connection with the disclosures during the sum
mer of 1971 that the Rand Corporation was not properly
safeguarding classified documents, this Office undertook·
two acts. I directed the Security Officer from our West
Coast Procurement Office at the Moffet Naval Air Station
in California to visit the Rand Corporation and satisfy

himself tha~ classified material furnished them by the Agency was both properly safeguarded and accounted for. His report was affirmative. On 23 August 1971, the senior

Security Officer assigned to this Office forwarded a
letter to the Rand Corporation stressing and reaffirming
the procedures Rand must follow in safeguarding classified
information furnished them by the Agency. Of residual

interest in this matter, there is summarized the contents of a memorandum of 2 July 1971 to the Executive DirectorComptroller from the DD/I which is in our possession. Th'is memor'andum reports that FBIS regularly disseminated reports to the Rand Corporation but that instructions had been issued to cease distribution of classified reports. While no

'other direct diss~mination went to Rand, otherUSIB agencies, primarily USAF, were passing.

"many" copies of DDtI products to thorized under USlB regulations. Rand as' auThe memorandum also states that Rand personnel had requested searches and document retrieval from the CRS facility.

5. In connection with action taken for the Office of Security, there are three relevant items:

a. The Printing Services Division, OL, was requested
by the Office of Securi~y to print a book written by

Harry J. Murphy, Office of Security. The book was prepared by Mr. Murphy under a Brooki~gs Institution Federal

0011.3

SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

-Executive' Fellowship. The book is entitled "Where's

What -- Sources of Info.rmation for Federal Investigators. 1I It is a full treatise on the existence of sources of in

formation that may be useful to an investigator. The

book's £irst printing of 300 copies was made in June 1967. Due to demand, a se~ond printing~Qf 600 copies was made in September 1968. The title pate of.the book gives

attribution to Mr. ~furphy, Office of Security, Central
Intelligence Agency, and the Brookings Institution FederalExecutive Fellowship. The book is classified ,Confidential,
and it is our unde~standing that the distribution was made

to appropriate agencies of the Federal Government. A copy of Mr. Murphy's book can be made available for review if desired.

Sometime in 1972, a representative of the LawEnforcement Assistance Administratio~ (LEAA) requested that the Agency give consideration ~o our publishing, at LEAA expense, an unclassified version of this volume. It was the' intent of LEAA to make broad-scale distribution

to Police Dep~rtments throughout the country. The Director
of Security and I consu1t~d on this matter and jointlydetermined that the LEAA request should not be honored be

cause the AgenGY should 'not put itself in the position of publishing law, enforcement material for,g~neral and unclassified purposes, and it would be an abuse of our printing facilities.

b. On 5 January 1971, the Director of Security requested that I approve his leasing up to eleven motor

vehicles for use in connection with a,specia1 support .operation which would last approximately 3 months. The Director. of Security informed me, in his requesting memo

. randum of 5 January 1971, that "This support. activity has

been undertaken at the specific instruction of the Director .and has his personal approval. II The request was approved;

c. From 1968 to date, the Office of Security hasrequisitioned from this Office a considerable amount of materiel which we understand 'was to be given or loaned,by

them to local Police Departments. In certain cases some

of this materiel was issued from Agency stocks and, in other cases, direct procurement of the materiel was made by funds furnished by the Office of Security. A' complete
1i~ti~g of such materiel is found in Attachment 2.

_......u+'.f.0011.4

SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

b. This Office is aware~ although it had no cognizance nor responsibility, that -an apartment was rented in Miami
Beach~ Florida, during the period of the Democratic National

Convention, 10-14 July 1972, and the Republican National
Convention, 21-24 August 1972. The apartment was used as
a meeting place I_---.-__---,;-,_._---,=---~_=_-__._--___._--_.____;_---
in liaison with members of the Secret Service and rendering
00:11.5
MORl DoclD: l45l843
SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of
Logistics
"assistance in connection with the political conventions
that were qeing held. l\'H Division is the cognizant
operating component on this matter.

7. The above recitation of facts represents, to the bestof my knowledge and memory, those ma'!:tf?rs \Vhich appear to be relevant to subject tasking given by Yhe Director.

I~-=-=--=--


2 Atts
cc: DD/M&S
001.:16

c.

',: ~.
•• • ::. M
." ..: .~...
<;;
~
...
-~:~-:.
. .~.
.-
'~""
...

__

OOtl7

.
\, - -...~...
-----------------------------------------_.- -._-_ ...•_•.....-_ -. ...... . ... '-""-"--'-'._--

--stttrr-I YES 0f\H:-¥


Requesting Date of Office Request Item Quantity Receiving

U.S. DepartUnit Cost ment or Agency

as

3/23/72 Telephone Analyzer 1


TSD 5/16/72 Transmitters, Radio Beacon 8

as

3/23/72 Telephone Analyzer 1

as

3/23/72 Telephone Analyzers 13

as

3/23/72 'Te1ephone. 10 Ana1yzer~

as

3/23/72 Telephone Analyzers 2


TSD 11/16/72 Camera Sets 20
TSD . 4/17/72 Camera Sets 10
TSD 11/18/71 Actuators, Recorders SO TSD 4/19/72 Tessi.na Cameras 3
TSD 12/ 7/72 Camera, Video 1
TSD 10/13/72 Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, 10 Equivalent6f WL 30691.. 0

t: TSD 3/26/71 Tubes, Image, WL 30691 2


OJ TSD 4/20/73 Cameras, Television 2~

L---


_•M__JEnS8*LY


ol-f"\0 f;T

1,350 BNDD

313 BNDD 1,350

White House Communications Agency

1,400 'Air Force
1,350 State
1,375 AEC 656 FBI zOO FBI

'1.. '

488 FBI
700 BNDD 18,045 FBI 4,639 FBI

·4,607 FBI
18,300 FBI

I I

~

0

.~ H

t:l
0
o
H
t:l
f-l

~ lJ1 f-l 00

~

w

UW::' .

~_

Requesting Date of Office Request

TSD 12/14/72
TSD 10/20/72
TSD 10/13/72

TSD 5/26/71
TSD 4/22/71
TSD 4/22/71
TSD 4/22/71
OL 2/25/71
as 1/30/71
OL 8/12/70

Item Quantity Transmitters, Radio 3
Actuators J Recorder 25
Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, 1Equivalent of WL 30691

Tube, Image, WL 30691 2
Transmitters 3
Module, Plug-In 1
Power Supply - UWP-39A 1
Telephone Analyzers 2
Telephone Analyzers 22

Cable, Special-Purpose Electrical 5,000 ft.

TSD 1/10/73
TSD 6/28/72
Ink, Special Formula 1 lot Ink, Special Formula 1 lot

0
0 TSD 7/26/71~
~

c.c

Transmitteri Radio Beacon 1

Receiving Unit Cost

U.S. Departmerit or Agencr

313 BNDD
591 FBI
4,639 FBI

4,639 . FBI '1,372 FBI
1,247 FBI

568 FBI
1,350 Treasury

1,450 Trea~ury
1·'1; ;
.42

White House Communications Agency :s:

0
1,825

Immigration and::cJ Naturalization

H
t1Service0
o
3,700
H

Immigration and

..

t1


NaturalizationI-'Service !Po

U1
728
U.S. Forestry
I-'

co JP. W


-_._,._-. -

'C.(


'I'.t
. .

001.20


. \ ,.

\ -lI .". I I


.J \L

EYES

MATERIAL REQUISITIONED FROM LOGISTICS BY SECURITY FOR ISSUANCE TO LOCAL POLICE ITEM Gas Mask M-9 Gas Mask M-17

QUANITY' 200
196

Steel Helmet and Liners231
Vest and Groin Protector96
Vest, Flak M-5234
Vest, Protective46
Vest, Grenade105
Execuvest6
Emergency Flashing Red Light22

*Searchlight, Tear Gas36
*Chemical Baton 6 1/2"36
1iChemical Baton 12"24
*Chemical Baton 26rl 24
*Mustang 35 Pistol6
*Searchlight with Shoulder Strap36

*Stun Gun3
*NOTE: Various quantities and types of replacement chemical
cartridges, loading kits, and batteries .were alsoordered for asterisk items.
00:12.1
MORl DoclD: l451843
14 MAY 1973
!·fj;i'·IOHAMIUH FOR:
Director of Central Intelligence
TiJJ"OlJGH
~3UBJECT
Doputy Director for !'·fa;I!'l[.ement and Servi ces
Sensitive Activities Performed by the
Office of Lo~istics
1. This memorandum
t cL'l Lgcnce, contains information for t he Jiroctorof Ccnt r al In ---------

2. This mer.'oran.dulllis submdtted pursuant to advice gi ven by the Deputy Director for Management and Services on 7 t.iay . that Office Directors report on activitiBs, either under their
cognizance or ot.herwdse known to t.hem, the nat ure of l.rhich could liossibly need explanation or justificati.on \f:)en viewed \dthin the statutory responsibility and author!ty of the Director of Central Intcl1i~encc. The responsibilities of the Office of Logistics (OL) are such that in ~ll matters herein reported, except two, the actions undertaken were at the request of another Agen~y component. We have prepared a brief description of each action involved and than have Inclua~d the
llama of the sponsoring component. The substantive reason for
the requests for action by this Office will have to be cleterr.lined by inqu1ry to the designated sponsoring component.

3. Facts pertaining ti both, actions undertaken at the initiative of this Office are as follows:

001.22

I

&UHJECT: Scn5itive Activities rerfnrw~d by the Office of
LogLs t Lcs

1.,
2
00:123

~------------_.

MORl DoclD: 1451843

~y


SUBJ~CT: Sensitive Activities Perfo~m~d by the Office of Logistics

·.tho DD/O, 1V'O will not honor any requisitian for surveil

lance equipment unless it has beeri"approved by the CI Staff of the DD/O.

4. Within the area of contractual responsibilities, the following it0ns ~re pertinent:

a. In February .1971. C91one1 L. K. Khite, the thenExecutive Director-C()mptroller, called me to attend a
meeting in his office, also attended by Mr. William Colby.

Colonel White explained that the Technical Services Div·Isian (TSD) had been requested to provide assistance to the FBI for a sensitive project designatedJ I(cur

rent1y designated

I

ICo1onel White di not dis

close the purpose of the ass1stance being provided by TSD</p> but did instruct me to assist TSD on purely contractual

matters. Since the Office of Logistics has no informationconcerning the mission or purpose of Project I Isubstantive questions concerning the subject should be


addressed to TSD. Other procurement actions accomplish~d for the.FBI aTe reo orted below. SpeGific mention is made, however, of~ca~se of the dollar magnitude, approximately m1 10n,. and the complex technical equipment that has been involved in the undertaking. b. The Procureinent Division, OL, currently has two requisitions in hand ·from TSD whi ch would involve reimbursable sales to the FBI. One such requisition in the amount of $36,900 is for two Westinghouse television cameras , The second requisition in the amount of $11,200 is for tlVowide-angle surveillance probes manufactured by Bausch and Lomb. No action· is being taken on either of

these requirements pending further instructions which will be sought from the Deputy Director for Management and Services. c. Over the years, this Agency has often supported other Government agencies from a contractual or materiel standpoint. Upon the submission of an officially approved

request, supported by a transfer of funds, the Agency

lV'ould either enter into "accommodation procurements" for the requesting agency or support the requesting agency by the issuance of materiel from stock. Such actions are

legally accomplished under the Economy Act of 1925. This

Act authorizes one agency to support the needs of, or provide a service ·for, another Government agency when such

001.24:
MORl DoclD: l45l843

SUBJDCT: Sensitive Activities rarformed by the Office of Logistics

action would be more economical and eliminate the need for "one agency of the Government to duplicate fac.ilities readily available from another. A typical example o··f this

procedure is purchasing photointerpretatiol1 gear for the
Defense Intelligence Agency element located at NPIC. In

connection with the current reporting requirement, however, I have had our records researched for the past 2 years and Attachment 1 reflects those transactions whi.ch annear to be relevant to the subject of ihis memorandum.0d. In connection with the disclosures during the sum
me~ of 1971 that the Rand Corporation was not. properly safeguar-df.ng classified documents, t.hi s Office undertook two acts. I directed the Security Officer from our West Coast Procurement Office at the Hoffet Naval Air Station

in California to visit the Rand Corporation and satisfy

himself that classified material furnished them by th.e Agency was both properly safeguarded and accounted for.

His report was affirmative~

Security Officer assigned to letter to the Rand Corporatiop stre$sing and reaffirming..the procedures Rand must follow' in safeguardIng classified

information furnished them by the Agency.. Of residual
interest in this matt er-, there is sumnari aed the 'contentsof a memorandum of 2 July 1971 to the Exec~tive Director
Comptroller from the DD/I which is in our possession.

This memorandUm reports that FRIS regularlydisseminated reports to the Rand Corporation but that instructions had been issued to cease distribution of classified reports. 1\'hile no

other direct dissemination went to' Rand, other USIa agencies, primarily USAF, were passing

On 23 August 1971, the senior t hLs Office fo rwarded a

"many" copies of DD/I products to
thorized under USIB regulations.

dum also states that Rand personnel had requested searches and document retrieval from

the CRS fac~lity.

5. In connection with action taken for the Office of Security, there are three relevant items:

a. The Printing Services Division, OL, was requestedby the .Office of Security to print a book written by


Harry J. Murphy, Office of Security. The book was prepared by Mr. Murphy under a Brookings Institution Federal

Rand as auThe memoran

OOi:z5

MORI DocID: l45l843

I..,


SUBJECT:

Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of Logistics

Executive Fcl101~·sh.ip,. The,book is entitled "Where's

"WIlat -- Sources of Information for Federal Investigators. II It is a f~ll treatise on the existence of sources of in
formatio~ that may be useful to an inv.estigator. The book's first printing of 300 copies was made in June 1967. Due to demand, a second printing o£ 600 copies was made , in September 1968. The title page" of the book gives attribution to Mr. Hurphy, 9ffice of Security, Central Intelligence Agency, and, the Brookings Institution FederalExecutive Fellowsnip. The book is classified'Confidential,

and:it is our understanding that the distr,ibution was made
·to"appropriate agencies of

of l>Ir. Murphy's book can be
t he Federal Government. A copy made avai LabLe for review' if desired.

Sometime in 1972, a representative of the LawEnforcement Assistance Administration (bEAA) requested that the Agency give consideration. to our publishing, at LEAA expense, an unclassified version of'this volume. It

was the intent of LEAA to make broad-scale distribution

to Police Departments throughout the .courrt ry, The Ddrect or of Security and I consulted on this matter and jointly

determined that the LEAA. reques't should·not be.hollored because the Agency shoul d not put itself in :the positLon of

publishing law enforcement material for general·~nd un-· . classified purposes. and it would be an abuse of our printing..facilities." b. On 5 January 1971, the Diractor.of Security requested that I approve his leasing up to eleven motor vehicles for use in connection with a special support

operation which ,...ould last approxfmatiefy 3 months , The

Director of Security informed me~ ,in his r~questing memorandum of, 5 January 1971, 'that' .HThis .suppor-t; activity has been undertaken at the specific jn~tructi6nDf the Director and has his personal approval." The request was approv.ed.· c. From 19'68 to date, the Offi~e of Security 'has , requisitioned from this Office a considerable .amount of materiel which we understand was to be given or loaned by them to local Police Departments. In certain cases some of this materiel' was issued from Agency stocks and, in

other cases, direct procurement of the materi~l was made
by. funds furnished by the Office of Security. A completelisting of such materiel is found in Attachment 2•

. ONLY

~[(\.:-"'"

v l·r"·· 00126


0L"':'u,
SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of

·1 Logistics


b: This Office is ~qare~ although it had no cognizance nor responsibility,· that an apartment was rented in Miami Beach, Florida, during the period of the Democratic National

Convention, 10-14 July 1972~ and the Republican NationalConvention, 21-24 August 1972. The a~artment was used as

tnm~~;~~~nP;~~~ II~eilloe~: OJ: tone 5e:re;~e: v::e

6

EYES

HEY


:IlCl l:l1UelollIg

001.27

SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Petformcd by the Office of
Lo~istics

assistance in connection with the political conventions 'that wer e being held. WI{ Division is the cogni aant operating cOl:lponent on this matter.

7. The above recitation of facts represents t to the bestof my know'lerige and memory t those matters whi ch appear to berelevant to subject tasking given by the Director•.
JOlll1 1'. BIaJ_e '

Director of Logistics
2 Atts cc: DD/M&S

:.; :
i

Ij.

:I

1

I

i
-i 1 I

~J , I

., :: I ..j

I

ONLY 00128
: I SECRE
... .' c(

-.

, ..

I

11
J,!

il..·
i.. : . l .


~!
~l
~I

a,

~l'

i'.

:t
~,
~
:;

'1

,iI

:i

.J .1~

_-_
..- ....-...__ 001.29"
• ,;i


.~ ;:!

. ;........ .';
\................ .. ....- . ..:~".'
"1
---"--------------
.;
Requesting
Date of
Office
Request
Item

Quantity Receiving

Unit Cost
U.S. Depart

ment or Agency OS 3/23/72
TSD 5/16/72
OS .3/23/72

Telephone Analyzer Transmitters, Radio Beacon Telephone Analyzer

1
8
1

as

3/23/72

OS 3/23/72

as

3/23/72

TS,D 11/16/72
TSD 4/17/72, , TSD 11/18/71
TSt> 4/19/72
TSD 12/ 7/72
TSD 10/13/72

Telephone Analyzers
Telephone Ana~yzers

Telephone Analyzers' Camera Sets Camera Sets Actuators, Recorders Tessina Cameras Camera, Video Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance,

EqUivalent of WL 30691
TUbes, Image, WL 30691
Cameras, Television
,

13
10

2
20
10
50
3
1
1
0 TSD 3/26/71

0 TSD.
~ 4/20/73
OJ
C
JI2
2

1,350 BNDD

313 BNDD

1,350 White House Communications Agency

1,400 Air Force
1,350 State
1,375 ABC
656 FBI
700 FBI
488 FBI
700 BNDD 18,045

FBI

~ 0 :;0

4,639 FBIH
t:J
0
4,607
o
FBI

, H
I t:f

18,30,0
FBI
"
I

f-l fl::. U1. f-l

co
fl::.
w

I I

Requesting Date of,
~
Office Request Item .Quantity

TSD 12/14./72 Transmitters, Radio3
TS1) 10/20/72 Actuators, Recorder 25

TSD 10/13/72 Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance,1
I
Equivalent of WL 30691

I TSD 5/26/71
I Tube, Image, WL 3Q691 2

ITSD 4/22/71 Transmitters3
TSD 4/22/71 Module, Plug-·In1
TSD 4/22/71 Power Supply UWP-39A 1
OL ·2/25/71 Telephone Analyzers2
OS 1/30/71 Telephone Analyzers 22

'OL 8/12/70 Cable, SpecIal-Purpose Electrical5,090 ft. Receiving cUnit Cost U.S. Depar me;nt or Agency.

313 BNDD
591 FBI
4,639 fBI

4,639 FBI
1,372 FBI
1,247 FBI

568 FBI
1,350 Treasury
1,350 Treasury

.42 White Hous c· Communications

TSD
1/10/73 Ink, Special Formula1 lot

Agency 3:1,825 Immigration and0 Natural.ization

~ H

Service
t:J
TSD 6/28/72 Ink, Special Formula1 lot0
0 :
0
3,700

o Immigration andH Naturaliza.tiont:J

Service I-'...TSD 7/26/71 Transmitter, Radio Beaconfi:>


1 728 U.S. ForestryU1

I-' 00 fi:> W

- ---_.-----------._---------
MORI DocID: 1451843
\. .. ...

(

','

I

/.

I t

"

00:132

-'"...~. ... " ..----.-. . "... .. . .. .. .... ... • ---'-" _ - . . r- -:.
· ~ ~~TERIAL REQUISITIONED FROM LOGISTICS BY SECURITY FOR ISSUANCE TO

LOCAL POLICE

ITEM QUANITY

Gas Mask M-9200
G~s
Mask M-17196
Steel Helm~t and Liners231
Vest:and Groin Protector96
Vest, Flak M-5234
Vest, Protective46
Vest, .Grenade105
Execuvest6
Emergency F1ashi~g Red Light22j *Searchlight; Tear Gas36
*Chemical Baton 6 1/2"36
*Chemical Baton 12"'. 24
*Chemical Baton 26"24
*Mustang 35 Pistol6
*Searchlight with Shoulder S.trap36
*Stun Gun3

*NOTE: Various quantities and types of replacement chemical
cartridges, loading kits, and batteries were alsoordered for asterisk items.

.._

.

~ ....._-_.... -.-LJ:.~.:;Al LJ
... 5E
_-------- ...--- ..- ..._-..crh..;;HHIAl _.- ..._---~ -

SUBJECT:--_

~_.. ---------

.. [OP':",·"II

..__.----- ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET_-._------------ -'-"- -..__..- ------_.-- _......
FROM: I !Hq. ~

TO: (Officer de-s;gnofion.. room number. andDATEbuilding)
_---',-----------_..---.__.------ ...
~1.TENSION NO.
D!OJCS,
OJC~-- .J ._._

~

IPATE

11 vs« iS73-._


OffICER'S COMMENTS (Numbe, eoch comment 10 lhow f,om whom RECEIVED fORWARDfD

INITIALS 10 whom, DrawQ line eeross corumn o'fer each comme-r1f.)

-

1nn!M&.SIRq.
2.I


3. ~CI

IHq.

~,

5.0
6.
7.
8.

~?"'botPf'1 ~l.o,MIJ'U(

ft-or ,Je;..t. ( ~e\ &s\:

fu (,\.~........) \~ vJ 01\1t"--r


\It C.~t" ~ O\CS

9.
<
10.

11.
",b,N~ ~ ~I\J~~
~~-t .. .

I15 m:fil,*".~ '1..3I .


12.
13.

.


14.
• f !
15. 001.34
I

., t ~~ 610~J&OUS 0 SECRET oCONFIDENTIAL' OINTERNAL oUNCLASSIFIED


l .......
_...... _-..-....-_
..
....
USE ONLY
4_J. ... _
.

orcsl " 11 r\~AY 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, Central Intel1i'gence Agency THROUGH Deputy Director for Management and Se rvlces

SUBJECT Activities whichrnight be considered sensitive issues. I have listed below computer processing projects which the Office of Joint Computer Support has participated in or is aware' of and which might be considered sensitive issues.

Most Sensitive Projects OJCS Project'Officer Project Organization, & Identification Telephone Nature of Project OJCS Reason for Listing

HYDRA Richard Ober

'ICI Staff I. SANCA los

[L.....------L.


IuRnI

A specfa.l project initiated by DCI Type of data being collected.

Machine Ind'ex to security files Type of data in index.

Information sto.rage & retrieval of drug related data (ORO's project OFTEN) Type of data in files.

Sensitive Projects

. I

Computer file of drug data. Type of data in file.

00135

·1

Sensitive Projects (Continued) OJCS Project Off'icer Project Organization, & Identification Telephone Nature . of

Proj~ct

OJCS Reason for Listing

'I'SD

1---1

Statistical. analysis of psychological data. Source of . data. Contractors are involved with project.

Sensitivity Unknown, but Possibly aMatter for Concern


Nature of data. Techniques of system discussed with FBI.

SPYDERI---==--Data on

radio frequencies used for

1

support of IrrPlace Morritor-; ing System, a system to identify unauthorized transmitters.

DMVRECas File of automobile license

Inumbers.

I

Nature of data.

File of Agency applicants who were not hired. Nature of data.

2
00.1..36
(

Sensitivity Ul1kn~~.!._~utPossihly a Matter for Concern (Continued) OJCS Project Officer Project Organization, &

IdCl1tification l'el~hon_CL_

OJCS Reason for Listing

Association with the named organization.

fq..... JOHl'r D. IAMS
II."
i
Director of Joint Computer Support
3

}EYE§ ·ILY001.37


~Ell

MORI DocID: 1451843
(

] cc:
_--.. '''-' --_....iE m:LY .........._--.........., -'._ .. ..._--... _........ -_......._..


_
..

_

_

l.J ,:.. ' ',L I J-..---_.,.


... .\;t.l.t·t..~j_ f'l - .... ----'-'''----

---_., ---_._-----_....ROUHNG f.·J'\~O rU:CORD SHEET--_._--_..._-_..- -----SUBJECT: \C',:.I::,-.ol) _--- ----_._.--


-.-. _. '---'--"---c-' ._--'-'-fPOM: EXTENSION NO.

Director of Communications01---._-----_.__..__.... .\

IHqrs.DATE 10 May' 1973
_..
TO: (Officer c!sig",ofion, to~rn nl.l~Le" ond DATE OFFICER'S COMMENTS (N"mber each comment 10 show f,om whombuilding)INITIALS 10 whom. O'OW Q line ouoss column af'er eeeh comm~n'.1RECEIVED fORWARDED
1. \DDM&S
.
-2.

IHqrs ,' . ~Ref SCi 1The


attached ~s ~n further response to your request.

.__0.
3.
,
.c.
..

5.
6.
7.
8. ..
9.
10.
11.

12.
13. .
u.-,
15.
FORM

3-62 oCONFIDENTIAL 0 SECRET610U~J~~~US


..

001.38..


...... _'0_~ _'0 _ . __.._•.••__~ ~ -. __ . ..1-:.-.._ " -~._.. _.# - ._" .. ~. #.~
OINT£RNAL oUNCLASSIFIED ..USE ONLY .
_ .........__ ..... ......_-----
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION .

SOURCE: oci \ DATE OF DOCUMENT: 8 May 1973 COpy NUM8ER (8):

NUMBER OF PAGES: two DOCUMENT NO:. oneNUMBER OF ATTACHMENTS:
REGISTRY

CONTROL NUMBER: SCI

I

OATE D.OCUMENT RECEIVED: LOGGED BY:

f
FROM: Special Programs DiVision, OC DATE: 10 May, 73
.
TO NAME SIGNATURE DATEOFFICE
t 'DICO Mr. Jack J

2 I\n""t~

3
~

Kei'tbIIAtlo

.'
. ..
5
oApprovaloActionoCommentoConcurrencesoInformationoDirect ReplvoPreparation ofRepiyoRecommendation

'0 Signature


oReturnoOispatd1oFile

.00139

MORl DoclD: l45l843
·~

-_...~...


SCI _
8 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT:
Summary, Special Programs Division (SPD),

'Office of Communications, Operational Contacts with Other u.S. Government ~gencies

1. Prior to 1969 the OC COMINT..intercept unit,o
which was then in Miami, had relatively frequent contact
with the Miami bureaus of the FBI and FCC, Miami Police
and the Miami Beach Police. The staff provided support

to these activities in monitoring, identification and
DB of specific illegal agent transmissions conducted by foreign nationals and American citizens in the greater·

Miami area. Arrangements for' this support were made

thro~gh the. DDO's'l

I

2. In late Septe~ber 1972, NSA, through Division DI
DDO. 'requested that the Special Programs Division initiate
a hearability survey of certain HP' long-distance commercial
telephone circuits between the U.S. and South America.
The circuits carried'drug related long-distance calls of
interest to the BNDD and other U.S. agencies. Because of
the availabilit of ersonnel and technical ca abilities
....
·3. The Chief and Deputy Chief. SPD and SPD/Special
Electronic Operations Branch· have been engaged in·informal
technical liaison with operating components 'of the FBI .
for a.number of years. Initial contacts and arrangements
.for support ·of. specific activities have been made by the
Division D/DDO. Support has been provided in the form of
'~JiB""no SECRET
~!e\TllL OF ATTACHMENT

.: 1----.JJJHft1lfi_---JI.'


, .·:'~~'b~i40


MORI DocID: 1451843
. .".
8 May 1973
-

exchanges of technical information on techniques, technical assistance and training, and the loan of Agency equipment.

In t~e.past sever~l ye!:;

:::nn

rr

bJS

been r~nd;rjd to

sens1t1ve FBI proJects _andl ~ _ Si:port-,

Ihas been and is ·presen D g g1ven to FBI pro ects IThese projects are'described in the attache . , sealed envelope. (

4. An operational test of an F/DF

system wasr~ OC-SPD pers

nnel
Iconducted n DO and
1n the earl ar.o the summer of 1972.
A location in Miami Beach, Florida was selected for the
tests because of similarity to the actual' target site and
environment in Saigon. Receiving antennas were placed on
the roof of the hotel being used as the receiving/DF site.
A hotel employee asked why the materiel was placed on the
roof. A team member in effect told him that the group
was an'advance security s~gment for the Democratic National·
Convention. No further questions were asked; the tests'
were completed and the equipment was returned to the
Washi~gton area. .:
Att•
• •

------'".~-----,

'00"14'1

. . .
..
.~.


9 May 1973

T~ ..001.42.I--.JIiS~


~ ... .....---------------,~..A
....
9 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SU~JECT: Organizational Deali~gs with Activities Inside the
United States
o

1. This MFR records organizational dealings with activities inside the United States known to this office.

z, In September 1972,I .Irequested secure communications in the Miami Area w1th local offices of BNDD


~ ,~~~e commun1cat10ns 1n was never 1ns a e
advised in April 1973 that there were plans

4un~~e~rw~aY=-1"-n~.·MEi~a~mTi to combine various Federal agencies antidrug efforts under a new Justice Department Division, and at

this time' it was not known where the new anti-drug office would be located. I

1__------------,---
3. During :he Democratic and Republican conventions, IJsupported requirements levied by ~he Secret
Service concerning name traces and other intelligence infor
• mation relating to subversive influences which might affect those conventions.\ provided some'technical advice and
procedural assista~ce 1n establishing a useful means of com-.municating between the two correspondents. WHD should be able' ,.

to provide a detailed resume of activities supported in' this matter.

~E. s:/f/7I .'5J

. Thomas

5'~~11


"Chief, America$ Staff, OC

,.
-.. .'." ,.. f...
...
.............
.

_._---_....._--_._...._-----------_. .__ •.._----.--


-r....

SENDeR. WILL CHECK CL"'.SSIF1C<,\TICN 'rop ;·ND ~jO"i'OM ~:~.~~ ...z: ;:.;-..~;-;::-.;:;:- .. '--'-r'-;':-.~::::--:-".:::- -"-r~'" j ....:•.-.:-.--;.:'--.
.---1...-. ...,._....-~_. _L.. _.....I. -.. ..-...J._.::::...::.L:.•___• .'--

f OFFICIAL HOUTI;,\G SLIP
- ._--_._---
TO NAME ANb ADDRESS DATE
7 1 ' ~.~!"I~.~....

-
1 Mr. William E. Colby~(\_. \:\1;..1.)\ .
___a~~
"_0_-_._..

2 ..

~

: ...-


-l'=-'~ ! !

3

-----------&11 W......" C/I
f·,.Ar:-----_.._---------
5 (t: 7"


I

;'.. .. ,-;.._'--'r':""~ -


"'" _'-...~..:..._..~-.".9' '., '. ~J -, .r-,.'A r:.. -
-
6
.

....

~..._••" .~-7"- /:,;.. ..:;/"
: ...~c s:~ ...........- .,.-
ACTION". .DIRECT REPLY, • PREPAlIE REI'lY
APPROVAL DISPATCH IlECOMr~EHDATIOIi
COMMENT
COliCURREHCE ll;fORMATlonSIG~ATlIRE - ..

.' .. Remarks:..........\.
l. filE RETURN----;.

-'. r.: •..t. -.


.,.- '----""'''"··r ... ' -_....-t, '.....". ~:~J:.. . Bill: f


The attached memorandum identifies
~
j

the funds referred to in Chuck Briggs' notes of 13 and 20'January 1972.

. .r

~

.'
FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER
FROM: NAMe:, ADDRESS AND PHONE NO_ DATE

Inspector General . 30 May 7~
" - '"'~... £L·...t ', . rORM NO, 237 Use previous editions(40)


1-67

**

"$ince-these notessare on a' tctally' separate -sensit.ive subject,
•pl~"pull'then) from this file '-_::vEC." CNo'te t9 C!MPS),'
"
p'
\
" '.': 001.44
~
.
c.
..'.,

-


MORI DocID: 1451843
,I
I
!

29 May 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General

SUBJECT : Mr. Colby's Request to Inspector General to Determine Subject Referred to by Two Notes . in a PP/B Memo to DD!M&S REFERENCE D/PPB Memo to DD/M&S dated 23 May 1973, Subject: Watergate Principals - Direct or Indirect Involverrrent

(

IIi
001.45
i.

.

- '----r-'-
MORI DocID: l45l843
....... ~ _0' "_••: __.,_. _ -~ __w. ~__ •••• ••••••,
•• ' ......:.. ... ~ :. • I _.....

........
--'
.-.
_
'-'

_._~~.---"---"--":,_ -_ . .._c:

~
b£:"'\fOER.WILL CHECK CI..ASSIF.. nON TOP AND BOTTOM Il ~l:L.4.SSIFU:D I I CONFiDENTIAL I r. SECRETI
OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP
-
TO NAME AND ADDRESSIDATEINITIAl'::: i
1
10
: . • -/. I
-'

.....1';" ,

:OC'";·:.,~~
#l
... :;
t :
...

~
y~~./
.. r r~7..,')

" :;>/:;2.. of.~


-2
3
'
...
S

I


I ..
. .
.

i-

ACTIOH APPROVAl CO'MMEHT DIRECT fiEPlY DISPATCH' fiLE CONCURRENCE IlfFORMATIOH

-

PREPARE REPLY -

RECOMMEHDAT1Olf RETURN SIGHATUIlE

Remarks:. .'A..J..A c-.. fl,.t4 c,.l-,~n r
Ii. - .~J
.e;.,;"
.., ..~~"J


I 7 "61 ·l-·

00:146
-,
FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENOER
FROM: N"MIi:. "ODRE:SS AND PHONE; NO. DAY,.

w. E. Colby Z3May73


U:,\CLASSIFIED I I CO:'iFIDENTIAL I SECRET

fOllM NO, 237 Us. pr,v;ous ,dilio/ls(40)

.1-61


"
',' \~ ."
"
..... ;.. , ...... ".

. '

.. 1.,_.

.It
....

".'


" ,.i
..

;.....-, - fJ ," ... "." \' ..
... !.. " ~.:....L ..... .' 'r :
~ ~ ._ .....• r "'--'--- ~G,-.:." __...._'.' .


I

, , -MEMORANDUM FOR: 1~ gt

f ,
'.

~ ILJq)-0J


-.~ ...
..


'....

-.
. Co. _ -"~23 MAY 'i~73

(DATE)

FOR"! NO,
101 REPl"C~AYFORt.! 10-101 _~__ '.~'_'_-(47)__ ._, USED:•. ,_,.,_ .••
1 AUG _J'":' ...._~.'~ I'~ ',-r- ...., . .
."

e.
l
~
...
54
~" _....,


r " ,....

, .


," .'
.!

. .. '....;-: ..", . ~

\ ,,-. " ., .. . :":"', ... .....~.


...."

'" ...:. ... " ...,.

-


_•
I
·1
!i

,
I
I

'f
I
MORI DocID: 1451843
,
~~.. \
"

•r • ..---.."c--·'--------·-.~·--'-----·------·· "'.'.

...._L..._.._____ .....
·-::1~(j:-~~~1·ii~~7,E~T-S:J:~7:i~·;;{iii~~~?i~i: ~I-'~:r~~~~ii-El:'
_._._.._. _ ...__.."_.'__._'_._. _. __._____
OFFICIAL nOCTI:\G SLIP
-'

.._-_._--_._-_.


NAME AND ADDRESS
_.----------_
...
~-~--
1--._--
_._
.
-
.
-
..
DA.....E
..~- ._---
I ._ V\T!.-E!~olby________ti~~
2

------

3
.-
.. 4

·~~U


- -
--_.~_.._-----_.
----
5

_

l,CTlON APPROVAL COMMENT COHCURREHCE

,........• DIRECTj·:EFLY

._.._---~--._PREPl.iIE REPLY

OlSPt.TCli"-'RECOMMENDATlOI{ fILE RETURH IHFaRMATIOH SIGIUTURE

Remarks:

.. ....

II

.tt

S-Ulc:;..e C.<.'V'~
')l-,
e
.t\
.6~
-Y\O\ . J-::> -rJO-,

..... :C
.' .lj et..\,.'(' c..~'j c::4;(c,-\: Q<'~(V-(.v, Q)k"""......... ·.A v.::. .."...\r


-Lu.. v.J4·lolj .(.n.~J lI..Jb-l t""(..IQ-k \O-A-.....'"

--Orrs cc.. 11-..;~-.),!""'0 ~~.\J..


J!..¥r~~ .'-\.u..t'"~ .:pc. \ A.'f '(' ...(;1/e, l.
FOLD HERE .....O RETURN TOSENDER
FROM: NA",e:. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO.
DATE

.
Charles A. Briggs, n/PPB
UNCLASSIFIED I I CO~FI[)ENTIAL
• . fORM NO, 23", Use previous edilions1-67
r
" , .

• : ........ a-: ....." .,.. \...'. ..., .'


..
., -r
5/23/73
I SECRET
(40)
.:

-, .


..

.' '<;. .:....i

.,

, .
jJ

..

, ·00:148
I
. ',NT

-


"

~LI

23 May 1973

Do -76


MEMORANDUM FOR:
Deputy Director ]01' Management and Services
SUBJECT:

Watergate Pr-incipnls Direct or Indirect Involvement

.i

1. This memor-andurn responds to the Director's request ~or a report of any Involvement in ;my capucity since 1 .Iarmary 1969
i Iwith Messrs. Hunt. McCord I Liddy I Young. or Krogh.

I
I2. I have had none with Hunt•.Liddy or Young.
3·. My McC~rd contact was indirect and occurred sometime. I
·1

during the late 1960's when I wss Director. Office of Computer Services. I opposed plans .for Technical Diviaion, Office of Security (under Mr. McCord) to acquire a separate computer f(;r
1 . its In-Place Monitoring System. r pf DD/S&T (then ORD)
IW<.1.S the computer individual woLcmgwIllI Ib ClIld,· I think, would
1 have details. .j. 4. The Krogh contact also was indirect and involved his
request. first through 6MB, that CIA fund foreign travel on behalf of the Cabinet Committee on International Narcotics Control. Indi
vidual phone discussions are noted in the attachad, The Agency

I

{oecil pointsras werel land I I understand

forwarded relevant documentation. Copies of memoranda. from :Messrs. Krogh,Iland Colby are attached also•

.j 5. I held a staff meeting yesterday to pass the request to
Iall OPPB employees. One officer who was attending a funeral will

not be available urrtll vtomor-row ,i. O\bhB\Cv·p"q88'z\l:n:.:r: ':~2~(S3V·i!J.i\.1~)I· J D\:&bb' EJ,G;:O OJJJJ~ SHG lsI Charles A. Brisgsi


O~;af

J - N.' E' COLO)... Charles A. Briggs Dn-ector of Planning. Programming, and Budgeting

J - ~qq~Ga2GG
D!2+x..~p.;Hon:
Attachment
As stated00149

MaRl DoclD: 1451843

... I

.'J

~"

~I

Attachment
23 May 1973

4 Feb 72 Call [rom Jim Taylor~ OMB r-eIfBud" Krogh arrd his deputy,
\'h.ltCl~ Minnick. of the Dorneatlc Councfl who plan foreign travel in connection with thetr nar-cotics interests. Jim was alerting us to their Intention, to ask us for funds for the travcl, 7 Feb n Follow-up from Taylor: Plan 3-5 trips fer 3 individuals-all in FY n. Cost probably $JOK. Minnick ready to make

first trip. I lis plugged in. E:-:Dir said OK r-e 'I'chrxn

visit.

7 Feb

n

See attached memo frcm Egil Krogh. Jr. to Bill Colby and

follow-on memos from I1(21 Jul 72) and Colby (2 Aug 72). 12(?) May n John Hurley, 01',15 called. menticning possible Krogh/ Minnick attendance at a Latin American (Station Chief?) conference on narcotics. He a)50 said eif ~he}herd.\ "h' tte II.ouse, was l'ayrng on a-t.v,'

.£:¥~ ~ WIt. h. ror hi:nself, Shepher-d arid Mark Algor. OM to Europe.

'23 Jun tz IIcommented on Krogh/Minnick interest

in getting CA activities, including large-scale PM,

on narcotics front. I Ipu&hing small-scale PP.

6 Jul 72 IIc<l1led. Notes say only: "Minnick-Hurley film. We will send. If

~ Aug

rz

IIcalled re Colby letter (attached). Said,..tra-vel

onders ready; need money this PM (No record in my

notes as

to

who was traveltng when, but have faint recollection of its bein{; to Mexico City).

I
andIIcontacted byI I -----1 Nov 72 R._:ilated1 r. JCall. Again notes are cryptic:
b1~~;braceL I Survey BNDD problems/


001.50

-


... ..\ ~DC". . '. vL~


"

13 Jan 72 Ex])ir (Colby) said DCI had approved $30K for sensitive CS project - no details.

20 Jan 72 Reminded ExDil" r-e $32K,he said DCI OK'd.

I

!
I
!

I

'..-. c::::

00:151
---~._. ........_.__ .._- ~._..-

... -._...


MORl Doc1D:1451843

1,"/ -, THE WHITE HOUSE


:

-:


VIAS H I'NGTON
, J.tcbruary 7., 197?

MEMORANDUM~FOR }31J..,I~ COLBY ,. SUBJECT: BUDGETA..."tY SUPPORT FOR THE CABINET CO£vlMlTTEE

ON INTERNATIONA;L NA.:.'\.COTICS CONTROL

The Cabinet Cornrni.ttee on Lnber.nat.i.ona.I Narcotics Control was created'
Sep~e:.nbbr7) 1971" by the President to centralizehi~ attack on the international drug; traffic. ' ."

I
The Cornrnrttee doe s not have a separate budget.

, . Salary and administrative support for its small) full-tixne staff has been provided by the Executive Office of the:Presid~nt. Other experise s are

being. charged to the constituent agencies andd~partments., .

! <.

provided support to date.
The CIA should be prepared to' defray not more than fifteen thousand'

f".

" , dollars in overseas travel expelfses fo; 'Cabinet Co:r.runittee staff during the remainder of FY-197Z. '

I. Walter C. Minnick,,' fhe Cornrrritt.ees a Staff Coordinator, can be contacted


IIIrfor further details.
IIThan;k you foryou~ assistance.
: The Bureau of Customs" BNDD, and AID/Office of Public Safety have
-I

r;y~0~

I.' EgilKrogh,

Jr.


IJ;:xccutivc Dirccl:or , Cabinet Committee on International Narcotics Co:n,trol
cc: John Ehrlichman Assistant to the President for Domestic Mfaixs Mark Alger _ .QMB) Chiefl 'General Govermnent Programs Division

colA KcpreLntanve; CCINC Workipg Group.
00:152
..

----'0:--'


...
.
~
,.:.~

-
,..~.
-
....
.~... .... ••• • _ -, '" ,.., .. ,_ ,._ -_ '":••••••••• 11" .. ,': .
,

-. .

PPB 72-1063
2AUG 1972

.. (lou-ATi·MEMOR.A.L"lDUM FOR: Deputy Director lot: Plans '.~b-II' . . .a


<; SUBJECT: Fbc:al Year 1973 .Budgef:arySupport{or ~ tne C:1blnet Corr>..miHee on International.:1

l

Narcotics ContJ:.ol (eCINC)

~

,I J .i

Me~~ toE~lr{rm.&lr:rDP/NAB..CO~didi' .Zl J'uly 1972; S:ilme ~ubject


,I
: .

1. This is in response to tha- referenced znezno rega.rding use of CIA funds to cover travele~penSle~ior the Whits House Cablnet Committee Staff for Fiscal Ye4.r 1973.

2. : You are authorized to obligated up to $15.0nO Cor the use ..of the White Hou$e Cabinet Committee Staff tor travel expenaes durlng FY 1973. Oblig:l.tion ~bould be recozded against the O/DDP allot.n1ent and trAvel order" issued aga.inst yO':lr own :ttppropria~efan
i number~

• t
:

. i 3. To the'e~tent that. jou t!.re unaotc.to <9.9orb this .requirement
··f within your preoen~allotment.. we will h4l.ve to arrange some repro! g·ra:cnming l:lter in the year f.o ccvee ~his 1J.l';lbt:egeted item.
!
to

I--r==================:;--I


.. w. E. Colby .Executive Dlrector-Compt.rolle1"

I

J

O/PP~ .rhg 2 Aug 72
Distribul:ion: Orig &' 1 - addressee
1.- ExDir '001531 - ER

1 - PPB Sub} (EMS
I 1 r OIF

.. ..Ll Rear;rono

l

i.

~--------~~~

1

~ . ..•...•. 21 July 1912i


I
. .' !
t

\

Executive Director -'Co~troller'.

..

" . I. NEHORAUDUN FOR::

VIA

i! .. ':-, SUBJECT . . Fiscal Year 1973 BUdgetary Support for'·.... .. . the Cab:fne.t ComIilittee on International. .. : .:


. .. .....~

.

.........
.J'''' ':.._ .... :

" . . . ~: '. .." '.. .1. or At our- invitation;> i1i:.. '''alter C.. Ninnick;, sta:fr


•i.re!i'.her the CCINC> is scheduled to attend anc'l-~Jlrtic1pate.' .
in. the Regional Narcot-ics Seminar sponsored byL!fH)DivisioP. .....•

fIon·2r-28.Jul71912~ ., .... ':"'~.. >.. ;... :....., : .4


. . .

.jor

2; . '. In accordance 1'lith procedures adoptied :for travel :

.,

White House Cabinet Committee Staff' in FY 1972;> it is .:

.,.

.' requested that funds to cover the cost of' ~~.. MinnickJs : " trip'be relec.s.ed. Attacned herewith is· a copy of' a f'ormal .

1

.request :fror.l j·ir. Eg!l Krogh dated 7 February 1972 to Nr. "
Willi~~ Colby. requesting travel· fuhds.for the balance of

t.. FY 1972. Hr .. Krogh is now preparing a f'or.:naJ. r-equasf :for '.!... COlilmittee stc.f':f for FYi;.1973.· I will fo:r:ward this request. '.... to your .office as·soon as it arrives. ....... \./ '\

".
Narcotics Cant.rol (ccrsc) ..".
~ .....,... ..~..
'.
..... .. "'"'
$15,000.00 to cover travel expenses for vfnite House Ca~~net
.~
il
..
~
~
.j .
II

Ii

II
:1.:!
!
L--...-rrrrnrTT.r!n'ff'nrr---
CjODP/HARCOG
"'~tachmen.t:· A/S
.--
.,

1

.i."'.
..'""
)J'~ --=-\~-t . J ......
~ ·1

-£:"'-~

L

.001.~4
• _J"
.~
{

r\~'i :.,~.;
• : t' ~~' t

DD/M&S 73-1809
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Management and Services
SUBJECT Contacts with Individuals Named in the Watergate Matter

1. I am addressing this to you instead of to the Director of Central Intelligence since I doubt that the information contained herein is of such signiftcance to warrant his interest and becauseit has been on record with the Agency since July 1972. However.. if you feel that the information is of such interest that it should be forwarded to the Director I shall putit in the proper format to do so. 2. My only contact with anyone named in connection with the Watergate and related matters was through] la former Agency employee now retired and living in Winterhaven, Florida. In December 19711 Icalled me from Florida and advised that he wanted to get in touch with Howard Hunt. He said that he did not have Hunts home phone number and that it was probably,unlisted but that since Hunt was a former employee, could I contact Hunt and ask him togivel la call. I had only met Hunt once about 10 years before but I agreed to relay the message. I called Howard Hunt at his home and told him that] Idid not have his home phone and requested he caUl ~ Mr. Hunt thanked me for . relaying the message and said that he woUld ca 11 CThis seemed of little consequence to me in December 1971 but in July 1972 lof the Office of Security contacted me in regard to the FBI investigation of the Watergate situation. At that time I Informed] lof the telephone call from ., . lin December 1971. Attached is a copy of a Memorandum for the .Recordprepared by I [as.a result of our conversation. 3. In the summer of 1972 I took my family to Disney World in Florida and took that occasion to drop in to seel· .~IItold me in a private conversation that he had been interviewed ree or four times by the FBI in connection with the Watergate affair and he related to me his contact

..,;;.

____------JI-EYES Bill SECR£I[_. IU01.55

-' L, to ..,3 L j \, I..I 'I.; t. I:: JU·.~·:i \L
-


. (2)

with Howard Hunt. On 19 July 1972 after my return from Florida I reported this conversation to the Director of Security and made it a Memorandum for the Record. This memorandum was sent to Mr. Colby and a copy of the memorandum is attached.
4. Other than knowing Mr. McCord through his employment with the Agency and meeti.ng Howard Hunt once in about 1959. I do not know nor have I had any contact with <.lily individual.s named or knowledge of related matters now receiving attention in the press.

r>0 .__:~ ..


/~/~. -::.....-../ "_.«:.»...../ .-<".::"?,~.-.l..._..:..·Charles W. Kane Special Assistant to the Deputy Director , for Management and Services

Atts

00156

".
" ....: t~'
..------------'--'------,,.-------_.:
\
NH10RANDUtwi FOR: Executive Dir ector-,Comptrolle
i
I
Per ou.r. cozrve'zsation on Monda.y,I
i

1 j

,.

20 July 1972I
(DATE) !
j,.
I!

FOR" NO.101 REPLACES FORM 10'101 1 AUG 54 WHICH MAY BE USED.( 47) .,I

&

I,


Ij
t
00:157
19 July 1972
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Conversation with]---.J

1. While on leave visiting Disney 'World in F'Ior ida, I dropped in to seeIIwho lives in Winterhaven, Florida. c=Jretired from the Agency about five years ago on disability due to a serious heart condition. He was with the Office of Security for about 20 years prior to his retirement. . 2. During a pr-ivate conversationc=Jtold me that he had been interviewed three or four times by the FBI in connection with the McCoz-dc Hurrt affair. I asked him why he had been interviewed, andIre told me that in, late 1971 he had been contacted by Howard Hunt who suggested that he consider an assignment as Security Officer for the Republican Party. c=Jvisited 'Washington in January 1972 to discuss the' proposed position with Howard Hunt who apJ2arently was acting on behalf of the'Republican Party.. c=J. furnfshed a resume to Hunt and discussed the position with him. Ultimately, he decided not to accept the position because he felt that his heart condition would not allow him to become involved in such activity.

3. According to

<h3>I

Iduring the meeting with Mr. Hunt

they discussed some, of the r equir ernents of the' job. At that tirne they discussed a need for both a positive and a courrter-audio program and a need for a good security sy-stem both before and dur irig the
Nation~lConven~ion. c=Jindicated that he sincerely believed that the Republican Party did need a security officer and a good security' programmer but felt that he could not afford to accept the job even. though it was a very lucrative offer. Apparently, money was not a

problem.

..

IO~:15a

, .. ,.1': ., • ,. ..••.I 4 • " :..•
..' ...

4. Whcn

c:=J

declined, he indicated that Mr. Hunt a sked for any other rccornmendations he might' have. Accor-ding to

c=J

he told Mr. Hunt that most of·the people he knew' were still in the . Agency, but he did furnish the name off Iwho might be possibly ready to reti.re from the Agen6y. 5. eJinformed rne that he assumed that the' Bureau obtained his name due to the r e s urne h e furnished M'r, Hunt. He said that the Bureau had talked to ·him on three or four occasions and that he had written up about a 40 page statement concerning

~-

his dealings with Mr. HUl1t. Wilen asked about Mr, McCor.d,,_-said that he really did not know McCord that well and declined any. knowledge of Mr. McCor-d l s technical capability:

...

6.1

lindicS\-ted that he had not been in touch

with Mr. Hunt since the early part of 1972 and knew nothing of the Watergate operation. He stated that he had gained the impression from the Bureau interview that the technical devices were being removed at the time of the arrest and were not being installed as c;>riginally reported. 7. All of the above information was volunteeredbyD
c--~---I and I really did not get involved in any discussion on the matter other than to cornrrient that I hated to see the Agency's name connected with such an incident in any way. The above conversation took place during a 10 oJ; 15 minute period and no other discussion relating to this incident was held. It is being reported for the record and for information of the Director of Security.

c

00159

~------------

..

17 July 1972

, , MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Charles W. Kane

I I

1. Last week Special Agent Arnold Par harn of the FBI cop.tacted the Acting ,DD/OS. He a sked whether or net the Subjects worked for-the Central Intelligence Agency. Pr-e viousIy, requests of this nature were followed up by the FBI with a.n interview of the subjects. 2. I briefed Mr. Colby who is the Agency's focal point on the "Water-gat;e" case and'the Acting DD/S of, the FBI inquiry. Mr. Colby suggested that "we determine the extent of Lnvolvcrnent a nd indicated that we advise the Bur-eau of their employment. 3. 'When Agent Parham was again contacted and advised of the Subjects' employment with the Agency, he bdicated that the -Bureau does not wish to interview them.

r. ;') ,

6J!-J"~~""v"Co ;j '4. The office of the DDIPS win interviewI_-.--_ _._--O-........JI in/4-:v ~..t..P-

the same fashion asIIwas previously interviewed.' I· t;i 7('2,1


5. I called Mr. Kane both at his office and his residence . and learned that he is in F'Iorida and will return to dUty on 17 July. I called Mr. Kane this morning to advise him of the inquiry. 6. Mr. Kane stated that he has no firm conclusion as to how the Bureau obtained "his name. He stated that he has seen Mr. Hunt'on only one occasion in 1959. At that time Hunt was the Chief of Station~ I The m.eeting was occasioned

00:16fl

, .

by the fact that 1\1r. Kane

Mr. Kane stated further that around

LC=·';"'h-:r---;i,....s""':·t-n-1-a-s-t--;'i-In-e-o"",:£""""I--;9;-;7"""1:;---;]-,e--'· r e ceived a call fr 0 InI I

who wanted to get ~n touch with Mr. I·I~nt. I lasked

Mr. Kane how J:1e could get in touch with him. Mr. Kane obtained Mr. Hunt's telephone nurnber through telephone infor ma.tion channels

whereupon he passed the number on tol I

7. Mr, Kane stated that he has infonnation that 1 _ has talked to the FBI on several occasions in connection with the current investigation and that he surrnis e s that the Bureau may have obtained his name from him.

Deputy Director of Security
"

,

00:161.

r:
.. Ir··~···· ._.._-~~=--'

,
..: ..;:...

. _. ... -_.. ._ ._-.- . -----.-----_._-.r ~ ;r.rHI<."'__WILL CHr::'-'lo( ,.,;~rION·J c.... .. ,..... J .r :1'JrrOMfr.iiITl----.... ..- ..-_

":,n.\~"If'/ED
.......
_r-_I~<..u-xnj'II':~
f•.
i \'
J.'
1
s
,----- -
OFfICI\L HOCTI:'\G SLIP

-- --.-. --_.DATE --,....,---
.0

NAME AND·, ._- ..........#;''·''is-... ~. --" -----INITIALS ...

1 DDM&S.I Hqs.

.. --_." _.--,~~ rq~·..._- f-.
-, .,


f
S,,.~

.


.M: no" !JliiECT REPLY PREPARE REPLY APPROVAL DISPATCH RECOl;1MEHDATlOH COMMEHT fiLE R£:rURH ..

-
lKFORMlT/OK SI.GHATURE

.. Rcularks:.~l'""~'.a.~

... CON,CURRENCE. ..-:... : -~ .. .. ,.
-.
..
.
. '.
...,
'.
."

:.

.. i

I
e.

. . '. -,.. ,. I; .. : ...'~~:fi'

.:~:.; e,, .:.'t' ~.' 00162


,. r
.. :.:..:;..., " .
...
~.. J
. . -:"~'...~-, " .I.
FOL.DHE~E.ORETURN TO SENDER
FROM: N ......E. ACDRESS "'N'o ~t-<ONE:NO. CATE:
II

P/PPB~ 8 May 73
FlEDII SECRETI ,-v...a-sIJE!'frIAL

fOl_ 110237 Use previous editions(40) 1-67

,..~..
8 May 1973
MEMORANDUM

FOR: Director of CentraJ. Intelligence '.

THROUGH: Deputy Director for Management and Services
SUBJECT: Involvement in Sensitive Domestic Activities
, "';4
1. As chief ofthe~DDPSystems Group{prior to 1969, I was involved
-= ~ .:..<' .,.
iI1providing data processing suppqrt for the following sensitive projects:
.:.

ter

,.~

a. Staf{(, Mr. Richard Ober's program for processing data, of U.S.citize~~beli;;ved to be militants! subversives. terrorists', etc.

, . c. A Systems Group sponsored program of common concern

listing travel of U.S. citizens to and from Communist cou.ntries.
2. In the same capacity my staff and I briefed police officers from
New York State and Chicago at the Del's reque;:;t (Admiral Rayborn) on
Idata processing techniques related to biographic intelligence (unclassified).
-,

3. As a member of O/PPB, I have been aware offive programs with
\ possibly sensitive domestic overtones.

DDS&T/O~'s

contract with theJ '. .Ia.

. r

VIP Beth and BehaVior Predlcfion

i5ystem•.

b. DDS&T/ORD's Project OFTEN which involved the collection
, • of data on dangerous drugs from U.S. firms. I believe Mr. Helms
• ter-minated this'program last Fall.
,I

.,. .


, ~,
5EGFU;T/SENSlTNE

C. DDS&T/ORD's D~oiectr


Q. ' lJJJ~&T/ORD's use of ERTS-A data to analyze Soviet wheat.)fields.

e. ,DDS&T Special Projects Staff t~ ~~ogram. .---........::=====::::::..:-_----,

i

bClence and Technology Gl:0Up

O/PPB

..

,

'I
I
II,\'.I

'.!
2

- 5E6PET'SEN§ITIVE- 00164I


_ ••• _. _ M .'_
I
i

t .fJJS ONt-¥-r-

8 MAY 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence
VIA: Deputy Director for Management and Services SUBJECT: Watergate/Ellsberg and Like Matters
1. No personal Irrvokverrierrr, direct or indirect to my knowledge on my part or my staff, with the Watergate or Pentagon papers cases , with Young on security regulations or with classified releases to RAND. I was awar-e, many years back when in the DDI, that certain classified papers were released to RAND from the production .

offices. One staff~ember,I Iwhile a member of the

IC Staff, did have a RAND contact which he is elaborating on separately. 2~ . There are some sensitive activities .or projects ofwhich I am aware, which are~ghty close to the borderline of legality in terms of Agency rill.s sion, including:

a. The CI Staff COber) project

Th1

.lpropr;etary,IL' _b.

c. An Office of Security narcotics cover project
d. A CI Staff funding-channel project with the FBI

I·1

~~j ~rNSfTIVE00165'lYES ONL.

I

3. One of my staff officersj JWI,ile in OCI


was the briefing officer for th~dAttorneyGeneral, bu can recall
. A

nothing in his dealing with Mr. Mitchell which would have any relevance to the current issues. A couple other staff officers are reporting separately on some sensitive activities in which they were involved prior to coming to this staff.

Director of Planning,
Programming, and Budgei ng
00:1.66
..:..
MORl DoclD: l45l843
W tJ .....L"JJII I L.IJ L.J J.)E OULY
ROUTING AND
SUBJECT: (OptionalI
• 0 ._. _
RECORD SHEET

FROM: 9. V. S. Roosevelt Chairman, TSCC IIHqs

TO: [Officer de'ignation. room n"",ber; 000 DATEbuilding)
RECEIVED fORWI.RDED
r---'I~E-------------·---

8 May 1973

OFFICER'S INITIALS COMMENTS (Number eoch comment to ,how from whom 10 whom. Draw a fine ocrcss ~oltJmn oftor each comment.)

1.

DCI
-~ L....-'~---1---t--..r------I
3.

4.

,
5.

6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
1...

~ : 15.

:,'.:.::. ...'..
00.167 ..' ~
.'.;: ".:\ .;\ .~.f ,t~ '~':~. ~
MORI DocID: 1451843
UNITED STATES INiELLIGENCE GOARD
TECHNICAL SURVEILLANCE COUNTERl\1EA~URES, COitHIITTEE
OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN
TSCC-D-386
8 May 1973,
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Director of Central Intelligence
SUBJECT
Support Furnished to .Elements of the Governrnerit
Outside of the Intelligence Community

The Interagency Audio Surveillance Courrtermeasur-es Training Center (ITC) was established at the instigation of this Cornrnittee and opened in late 1968 under the executive management of CIA. The need for such a school had been recognized by the National Security Council's Technical Subcorrrrnittee as far back as 1962 and was reernpbasfaed by the Security Committee of the USIB in their October 1964 report titled "Damage Assessment of the Technical Surveillance Penetration of the us Embassy, Moscow.JI Membership on the TSCC has been confined to agencies and departments who are represented on the USIB. F'ro.m time to tilne other elements of the Government have indicated their concern over the audio surveillance threat and asked for membership on the Committee. In all cases they have been turned down with the sugge stion that they take advantage of the TSCC's product either through liaison with the security organizations of the Cornrrrittee l s members or by nominating students to attend the lTC. During CY -72 the following students were trained at the ITC:

Central Intelligence Agency 10
Defense Intelligence Agency 5
Department of the Air Force 25
Department of the Army 50
Department of Justice (BNDD) 4
Department of the Navy 5
Department of State 3


00:168
MORl DoclD:_1451843

Depar tmerit of Transportation3
Internal Revenue Service3
National Security Agency1
United States Secret Service 6
White House Communications Agency 2

117

The ITC has furnished training only to ernployees of the agencies and departments of the Federal Government. State and local police departments have not been detailed to the lTC.

-
Cornelius V. S. Roosevelt
Cha{rr.nan
-;..

00169

Retiremcnt Infonnation - E. HO\vard Hunt;

1. Date of retircment: 30 April 1970

...


2. System: CIA Retirement and Disability System 3. Grade and salary at time of retirement: GS-1S, Step 8 - $28,226
4. Creditable civilian service used in computing annui.ty:

17 ~hy 1948 to 8 June 1948
9 June 1945 to 19' February 1949
8 NOVffinber 1949 to 30 April 1970

- Economic Cooperation ArunDlistration
- State CECA)
CIA

s. Annuity: At retirement - $1,020 per month At present - $1,181 per month

(which includes cost-of-1iving increases since date of-retirement)

6. At the time of retirement Mr. Hunt did not elect survivorship benefits. This meant that upon his death, his wife would not draw a survivorship annuity; By letter of 5 April 1971 he raised the questio~ of changing his election but. was' informed by the General Counsel on 6 May 1971 that this could not be done. By letter dated 5 May 1972 Mr. Hunt asked Mr. Houston to raise with the Director the possibility of being recalled to duty for a short period of time, after which he could retire again and elect survivorship benefits. By letter of 16 May 1972 Mr; Houston advised Mr. Hunt that to call him back to duty solely for the purpose of pennitting.. him to change survivorship benefits would be in violation of the spirit of the CIA Retirement Act.

00:1.70

-


..
1
22 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General

Bill-~ ! i

Attached are the reports Bill Colby asked to see:

, . 1. Restless Youth (September i968), No. 0613/68, Secret/Sensitive/No Foreign Dissem (Copy 78).

This document was produced in two ver.sions--one with the chapter on radical students in America (pages 25-39) which was sent only to the President, wa.it Rostow, and Cy Vance (former Deputy Secretary of Defense); the other version without the references to the American scene was disseminated ~o twenty people outside the Agency. This document without the material on the US was updated in February 1969 and copies were sent to the Vice President and Dr. Kissinger. A still more abbreviated edttion was sent to the Attorney General .in March 1969.

2. Black Radicalism in the Caribbean (6 August 1969),
r,T;:18i9/Ei-g':Se~r~t/N~-F'orcig'~'I)issem (Copy 142).
3. Black Radicalism in the Caribbean--Another Look n?'·i~i·;;8-197D~N~·~-·0517T70:·-S-~ret./NoFor~Tg~-·
])i:..;::;Uf.l1 (Copy 98).

b

o t"l·:·j L'Ieaso note tha.t these are our record copies and should

~'t't{c ~l.~·- .~".'---" .-..- -.- - -------- --,.-.----- - ' -.----.---.

),U'~..ILU V'i. I LUeL,,)(
Deputy I)in:du!' Io r Inklli.>....r1;:·(:
Attachm-:Ill:.:::001-71..
Ot::::~·~n

I .. 1

MORI DocID: 1451843

«I


. '.. _..

c.

5.ENDER WIl.L.CH: • CLASSIFICATION TOP AND BOTTOM
.
I
OFFICIALROUTI~G SLIPI
TO NAME AND AODRESS
1 M..',; ......-;.=1,.,.""
-2

DATE INITIALS I

. f
3 ..
of
s
I
6

ACTION DIRECT REPLY APPROVAL DISPATCH

CO~EHT FilE CONCURRENCE INFORMA'(ION

"Remarks-:... .
.
I

PREPARE REPLY RECOMMEHIlATIOH RETURN SIGNATURE

'. ~.'.


.r

001.72.' .


FOLO HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER
FROM: NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO. D"TE

.,"'..... OIDCII , • 12/24/7LJ


FO./II 110. 237 Us. previous editions1-67
'
..
.\
MORl DoclD: l451843
,
'i
l
1. 1)i'>::$(·!~in;-·,th-·u t o t b
I
~~
t (
11
t~ .o:~~·i~:~·~~·:~Cl·;~'"i-~·
.....
_1;:

fllf.1

c C~:b'i.li0t ~!'~d \d.thir; ·chf.' i';~P:" 1E~:::.: i1·fSS--r"'::'t\.~tfi is !:.I~rl~·.1.t i vo [-~··~~,·~~i:;f··--r ~;--~·,,:·t:··~·(.:·ct l~.~ t t.~"l" t t.;:·':2i~"~~;-0:r'-"t:i:: l-:i}~·~;: 1·!. t:c")(}d

t..h:.\t i"\ul}lic o ~')\:::~::Ui"~~ o f ttH..': A.l;'.:·";.:':.:1 t:, tLt·.~:<r·?:-:t in t.h~~ IlrCit:l~'!;1of 8tud~nt diEsidcllce ~ould r~~ult in cO~5idcx·ablc r~Qloriety) part~c~la~l~ in the unIversity world, a~d b~cause pursu~nt to ~!r. 110:3tO'i:'S illstructloo.~"
a :<:t~d:r cd': btUGNlt. L~:.ce!:c'ir·.~; tEl'" l'ig:{>OCy'!;l

1r>r ci~·.~:;:'Dil:ttt-:on to th.e
a r.d ~.>.thil: the

ft?th.::.r" t he ('h~ptf!r \Yrd.c:h Soci~t~ (5DS) ~nd by
;~.:.::t . on 0:[ :-:[;5.

the author LncLudod in his t.er.t

r~dict:ls in t.he Unite-a Stnt~:<:, tl\\.'reby c!Hl.:rt1".:r. WD have Sr\.l":.itb.ea th~ pnpei"

r..J{;J<>o,'rs of the Pr~:;;i~lO'!jt"s CabLne t

IHt~~lliG(H}ceOj~~uni ty by elit=ir.nt'ing Zilto dh.cuss,es Students for·:\ Deraocr a t Lc

~trikillg from th~ Prosp~cts s~ctto~ all
2. Oi.,t.s~(e the
~Te heli~ V~.: t.n a tv l:l'e bf}.sic
tht ptn·p~}:-'.e of. 1imiml.ti~g

to tb~) COl::,'stic rFfereDc0 th~t t:::. Tbol'.!~i:'ri.C!:H1 ~; tuden

F:n-t: II oI f":'::'f.le!~~ Youth
CoYernm~nt, prcvlded.that

COl1l;~lAt1ity but. within tb;:: G:......,:'n,l2,trit··
t.e;:t sho\ilo t;e 1urtner .i:~Cl'tpCi for
even tho!!&OSt caaueL r<:f~r:::nee
sc~nc--1E':;;:tSO~eonc i:r.ier fron SUch a c nance

tbe originsl p£por h~d contai~~d ~ ~~ctio~ on ni.uotcen count ry ('h.-:ptt'~S ''d.iic.h form

can b,~ di~;~;--'",;il:~d'.'.·d v Lthi n thf.l
th@ cODtrolti nppro?ri~t~ ~o th~1r cln.s;~Uicat.ton~re ob$erv.~d. To do the f'di.tin~ ~no rcpripting

r~·uir~d would take several Qnys at l~a~t. For
_>. n£,l\'.£s~ to the ~cs.dcmic ;;'or) a Dr to tlH" pUblie-

th~ reR30CS,9~tiorth.abo~e. W~ b~~~evp thaL rcIeasp of
tb~ vnsic t~~~ ~ould harm the A~ebcy. The country chgpt~rs

couLd no t be relea~ed 'Wi'thou't first be'ing rc:'\;:ritter: ·to
~liminv.t{~ e.ll cla$eiiied inform~tiQn. Once this. ...as done,

001.73

I ...

: l.c y ":'.J~\1d C:L<l)l.tcate1::.1" t)D·::'.t.10n r,h'",r tty t va i l~;Lle i 1'. tb::
(:'i) 1; ~'.1.";'~~;q. 'rr;'i':.f'(J is }·.O 1::{";~ (":if c ve r..t lit{~r:-~t~~r(~ l."n "tl'.:4~
~: ~\ ~:,;'-' c t c.•f. :::- t l)f~ rwt CiSf,uit,; vb: t.u~.1l:)' everypL:Ll:tsh ....l' ~!;

.. ~J:;.:;~~":, ~.:t InR~t O!>:::~ title en his c ur r ont; lh:tiI;~_~. i,;:~;:j':<"V{:t~,
..::L,i~::-l' n.:;('·~·.ci{;s (,Jf 2~~·v·~..lrnJ~;ent, aucb t:,.s Ih:t:..1th, -:·'::1~.:C~4t~:"·~d ~ l\d ti~~lf;'-:.re, Il£l·e ~Vl).nS:i!4C=d la.(:~C:E..rcl3 o n f.,l.e E"u17j~·... c t :~.nc i·.1."C r~r·t·r~r;.rr.·(! t o r)\.~t~l t sh tb(-ir·.1 1r~diJ~Js. C~.:.rt~~r-:!.t~~.ntly I \ [~ r't~:-t"C-;I~':".~""pd l..:.:.::~.~.i:!·:t f,.>':.:t1;1f.c J>:"lE:g~·n ..

OOl.74

\.\ ,

\,

( "


.,. Restless Youth

SEPTEMBER 1%8
No. 0613/68

00176 ..... ---~ ~78


MORl DoclD . 1451843

.....,..-_""'-'r~_ ..

, .
• • I ~.~••
~ ~ .:.:....::::~! ':..:

'~'9

·{3·1/q1
,'.._._~-------:...--~~_

rs Lt.

.


r.. «:i !\~y

001.77

.r '.'
~ ~I f I~: ~. :;.


I'..j'.

<
~

.

. -~": .
14 Hay 1973
r~40RANDm1 FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Research Project on Robert Vesco

1. On 16 October 1972 Messrs. Ereckinridge andI in the course of a Survey, were briefed on activitieOJ: Glle Atlantic/Pacific Division of the Office of Economic Reoorts. One project cited was a query from the Director, apparently at the request of Secretary Shultz, to the effect, ""../hat do we know about Vesco,," the man then running lOS. Two of OER's analysts were assigned to the project and; working through the Do~estic Contact Service, spent a day going over the files of the Securities and Exchange Commission. There apparently was some contact also with EUR Division of the Deputy Directorate for Plans and with the Office of Current Intelligence. 2. The in:formation above is based on rough notes and obviously is sketchy. It is cited now not to suggest any wrongdoing but because of the current publicity about Vesco and the probability of continuing probes into the "subject by the press and the courts.

Scott D. Breckinridge
00178
MORl DoclD: l45l843

..

Director of Central Intelligence
Please handle in this channel due to classification of attachment.
WARNING

This document contains classified information affecting the national security of the United States within the meaning of the espionage laws, US Code, Title 18, Sections 793, 794, and 798. The law prohibits its transmission or the revelation of its contents in any manner to. an unauthorized'person, as well as its use in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest ot the United states or for the benefit of any foreign government to the.detrirnent of the United States.

THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE KEPT IN COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE CHANNELS AT ALL TIMES

It is to be seen only by US personnel especially indoctrinated and authorized to receive COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE information; its security must be maintained in accordance with COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE REGULATIONS.

No action is to be taken on any COMMUNICATIONS .INTELLIGENCE which may be contained herein, regardless of the advantages to be gained, unless such action is first approved by the Director of Central Intelligence.

TOP SECRET00:179
8 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence FROM Deputy Director for Intelligence

SUBJ:ECT Activities Possibly Outside CIA's Legislative Charter 1. This memorandum responds to your instruction to report any activities which might be consider-ed outside CIAts legislative charter.
2. All Office and Staff chiefs in the Intelligence Directorate have reviewed the past and present activ.ities of their components.
I have received responses from all of them, and none reported any activities related to either the Watergate affair or the break into the offices of Ellsberg's psychiatrist. Although contacts with three of the people allegedly implicated in these incidents were reported, these contacts were on matters other than the two improper activities: Hunt: Col. White, Richard Lehman, and I talked to Hunt in late 1970 regarding his preparation of a recommendation in support of the Agency's nomination of R. Jack Smith for the National Civil Service League Award." Mitchell: While Mr. Mitchell was Attorney General, an ocr officer was assigned the task of providing him with daily briefings on foreign developments.

~ET
CIA INTERNM>uSE ONLY

00180

Young: Harry Eisenbeiss an¢1

~f

CRS

had frequent contacts wlth Young during the summer of 1972 in connection with Executive Order 11652 and the implementing NSC directive. This involved visits by Young to CIA to discuss information storage and retrieval and several meetings of an interagency group dealing with the implementation of the Executive Order and directive.
3. In accordance with mytnstr-ucttons, several Offices reported domestic activities which might appear questionable to outsiders. Their responses are attached. Most of these activities are clearly within the Agency's charter. but there are a few which could be viewed as borderline.

DCS accepts information on possible foreign involvement in U$ dissident groups and on the narcotics trade when sour-ces refuse to deal with the FBI and BNDD directly.

DCS. for six months in late 1972 and early 1973, was acquiring teiephone routing slips on overseas calls.

NPIC and COMIREX review satellite imagery from NASA programs to identify photography too "senarttve" for public release. "

-,

. = "0018.1

CIA INTERNA USE ONLY

NPIC has examined domesti,p coverage for special purposes such as natural catastrophies and civil disturbances.

ocr. in 1967 and 1968. prepared intelligence memoranda on possible foreign connections with the US anti-war movement and world-wide student dissidence (including the SDS) at the request of the White.House,

FBIS has on occasion supplied linguists to work directly for another agency. e. g.• to the FBI to translate Arabic in Washington.

FBIS monitors radio press dispatches and reports covered by copyright. These are circulated. within the Gover-nment and stamped "Official Use Only"• .This has gone on for three decades without problems.

FBIS has monitored and reported on foreign radio broadcasts of statements and speeches of US citizens such as those by US paws in Hanoi. "Jane Fonda. and Ramsey Clarke.

l::JDWEnD VV. rnoc1'0""1\'--
Deputy Director for Intelligence
Attachments "
-3
"
S~ET
ONLYINTERN~USE
001.82
CIA

I


\.,
I

00183

MORl DoclD: l45l843
7 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Deputy Director for IntelligelJ.ce
SUBJECT:
DCS Domestic Activity

To the best of my knowledge, DCS has not engaged in any activity outside the CIA charter or ,that could be construed as illegal. Some of the functions that we perform under HR 1-13f (i) of providing operational support within the US to all elements of CIA and to the USIB-member agencies, however, are perhaps borderline or could be construed as illegal if misinterpreted. For example:
5. Collect information on possibl~ foreign involvement or penetration of US dissident groups, but only in'a passive manner and only when the source has ,refused to pass the information directly to the FBI.
6. Collect information on the narcotics trade, but again only 'in a passive manner when the source has refused to pass the information directly to BNDD or the FBI.

I

001.84
MORl DocID: 1451843
·'
SUBJECT: DCS Domestic Activity

10 • .Acquire routing slips recording the fact of overseas telephone calls betwe~n persons in the US and.persons overseas and telephone calls between two foreign points routed through US switchboards. This activity lasted for. approximately six months but has ceased.

. 00185
MORl DoclD: 1451843
.. I II'"

.

\

II

i

! i,

00186

"MORl DoclD: 1451843

~T EYES~

7 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Director of Central Intelligence
VIA
Deputy Director for Intelligence
FROM :
Director of Current. Intell~gence
SUBJECT
Activity Related to Domestic Events

1. OCI provided current. intelligence briefings to John Mitchell as Attorney General~ With the approval of the DCI, this practice began in the pre~inaugural period in New York and continued until Mr. Mitchell's resignation as Attorney General; The OCI officer assigned to this duty had a daily appointment with Mr. Mitchell in his office at Justice; 2. The briefings provided were strictly on foreign intelligence, and were a legitimate service for CIA to . provide to an official advisor to the President. who sat on, among other bodies, the 40 Committee. It must be

presumed, however, that our man's daily visits were known and speculated on elsewhere in JustiQe. The problem comes in the potential p.res's treatment: "CIA Officer in Continuous Contact with Mitchell."

A:L:CZLdL U nellllldil
Director of Current Intelligence

00187

MORI DocID: l45l843
.SEe~':f

CTA INTERN;!, rISE ONT y 7 May 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Director of Central Intelligence
VIA :
Deputy Director for Intelligence
FROM ;
Director of C~rr~nt Intelligence..
SUBJECT
Activity Related to Domestic Events

1. OCI began following Caribb~an black radicalism in earnest in 1968. The emphasis of our analysis was on black nationalism as a political force~ the Caribbean and as a threat to the security of the Caribbean states. Two DDI memoranda were produced on the subject: "Black Radicalism in the Caribbean" (6 August 1969), and "Black Radicalism in the Caribbean--Another Lookll (12 June 1970). In each a single paragraph was devoted to ties with the US black power movement; the discussion primarily concerned visits of Stokely Carmichael and .other US. black power activists to the Caribbean and other overt contacts. 2. In June 1970, Archer Bush of OCI was asked to write a memorandum with special attention to links between black radicalism in the Caribbean and advocates of black power in the US. The record'is.not'c1ear where this request originated, but it came through channels from the DCI. The pape~ was to be treated as especially sensitive and was to include material provided by the Special Operations group of the CI Staff.. The CI Staff material was voluminous but did not provide meaningful evidence of important links between militant blacks in the US and the Caribbean. This, in fact, was one of the'conc1usions of the paper. The memorandum was produced in typescript form and given.to the DCI •

.'

00188

L
SECMJ':l?

3. For several months in the first half of 1968 the Caribbean Branch wrote periodic typescript memoranda., on Stokely Carmichael's travels abroad during a period when he had dropped out of public view. Our recollectionis that,the memoranda were for internal CIA use only"

although a copy of one was inadvertently sent to the FBI.
L<ICIlaLU nelllUdlI
Director of Current Intelligence
'..
.".

00189


.:r .. ~F.T
.....
EYES~
~
7 May 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Inte11~gence VIA ·Deputy Di~ector for Intelligence FROM ·Director of Current Intelligence SUBJECT : Activity Related to Domestic Events 1. In late spri~g of 1968 Walt Rostow, then Special Assistant to the 'President for National Security, Affairs, tasked the DCI with undertaking a' survey of worldwide ,student dissidence. Confronted by ~mult at campuses like Columbia and mindful of the violence accompanying student outbursts at Berlin's Free University' and elsewhere, Rostow sought to learn whether youthful dissidence was interconnected: spawned by the same causes; financed and hence manipulated by forces or influences hostikto the interests of the US and its allies; or likely to corne under inimical sway to the detriment of

. 2. The paper was p~~pared byl

with the assistance of the CA and CI Staffs. -The DDI,

D/OCI, and I ~et with Rostowto elicit the reasons

for his or cue FLesxueht's. concerns and to agree on the sources to be examined,'the research methods to be followed, etc.
US interests. 3. Written during the summer of 1968, the most sensitive version of' 'Re's=t:le:ss- YO'u·th comprised two sections. The first was a philosophical treatment of student unrest, its motivation, historY, and tactics. This section drew heavily op overt literature and FBI reporting on Students for a Democz'a't.Lo Society and affiliated,groups. . In a. sense, the survey of dissent emerged from a shorter (30 page} typescript study of SDS and its fore~gn ties the same00190December 1967. (We no long~r have a copy.l

10f OCI

author had done for Mr. Rostow at ,the 'DCI' s request in

.

4. Because of the paucity of information on foreign student movements, it was necessary to focus,on SDS which

. then monopolized the field of student action here and . abroad. , A second section. comprised 19 count.ry chapters--' ranging from Argentina to Yugos1avia--and stood by itself as a review of' foreign student dissidence. 5. Because, SDS was a'domestic organization, the full paper' 'Re's't:l'e'ss' You'th~ including the essay on worldwide dissent went only to nine readers. A copy may be in the Johnson Library. . 6. Following the 'pqper's favorable reception by the President. and Mr.' Rostow, the DCI briefed the NSC on student dissent. The sensitive version 'subsequently was updated and sent to the White House ,in February 1969.

7. The less sensitive text was disseminated in .

September 1968 and then updated and issued again in March 1969 and August 1970.

Rlcnaru Lenman Director of Current Inte11~gence

OO:l91.
r
.'" l '.
.'.
WARNING

This document contains classified information affecting the national security of the United States within the meaning of the espionage laws, US Code, Title 18, Sections 793;794, and 798. The law prohibits its transmission or the revelation of its contents in any manner to an unauthorized person, as well as its use in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or.for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United states.

THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE KEPT IN COMMUNICATIONS INTElLIGENCE CHANNELS AT ALL TIMES .

It is to be seen only by US personnel especially indoctrinated and authorized to receive COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE information; its security must be maintained in accordance with COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE REGULATIONS.

No action is to be taken on any COMMUNICATIONS INTELLI~ GENCE which may be contained herein, regardless of the advantages to be gained, unless such action is first approved by the Director of Centr,al Intelligence.

TOP Se;CIXET
001.92

. ,

-TOP SflSP~

EYES ON .
7 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Director of Central Intelligence
VIA

Deputy Directpr for Intelligence

FROM ··· SUBJECT ·

Director of Current Intelligence Activity Related to Domestic Events 1. In late: 1967 OCI participated in the preparation of several short intelligence memoranda aealing with the . foreign connections of US organizations and activists·involved in-the anti-war movement. The main purpose of these reports, prepared at the request of the White House, was to determine whether any links existed between international Communist elements or foreign governmen~s and_the American peace movement. oxThe conclusion reached was that there was some evidence ad hoc contacts between antiwar activists at home and abroad but no evidence of direction or formal coordination. 2. In October 1967 President Johnson expressed interest in this subject and ordered a high level interdepartmental survey. " In response to his personal request" to the DCI, Mr. Helms. asked the CI Staff to collect whatever information'was available through our own sources and through liaison with "the FBI and to pass it to OCI, which was directed to prepare a memorandum from the DCI to" the President. 3; A book mess-age requirement was sent to all stations to report whatever information was- on· hand relevant to this subject. Although ·agent reports on Communist front operations overseas were-of some value, the prlmary source of information on the "activitieS of US activists--and that was quite limited--was sensitive -intercepts produced by NSA, which had been similarly tasked by the ·White House.

~TD

EYE"S~
00.193

r .. ~~RETII

EY~

4. A draft memorandum was jointly Prepared by OCI and CI Staff. and forwarded to the ·DCI. He passed this typescript memo, dated 15 November 1967, to the President personally. The White House copy is now in the files of President Johnson's papers at the library in Austin. 5. Brief follow-up memoranda were prepared and . forwarded to the White House on 21 December and 17 January 1968. According to our best recollection, no further finished intelligence reports on international connections o£ the peace movement were produced.

XC:::z:; 1L;CC:: c:c .
Director of Current Intelligence

TO~PRRT/I


. . '.

00194


MORl DoclD: l45l843

00195

-.....,.~......--.......-


7 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Deputy Director for Intelligence VI.,:f
SUBJECT:
Contacts with David Young
1. In the

, summer of 1972, I had frequent contacts with David Young. He was in this building under my control once. These contacts related solely to Executive Order 11652 and the NSC directive concerned therewith. Young was apparently at the time in the process of drafting the NSC directive. The visit to the building
un~er my control was for 'a briefing on CRS processes for storage and retrieval of documents. and is apparently reflected in the paragraph of the directive concerned with the Data Index. I visited him in his White House office at least twice in the company of an inter-Agency group concerned with the Data Index. 2., In August of 1972,f lalso visited Mr. Youngfs office ill cae company of an inter-Agency group to'discuss the data index instructions. CIA compliance with To the best of my knowledge no one in CRS had any contact with Mr. Young in his role as a "plumber."

,R. c. EISENBEISS Director, Central Reference Service

00196

-,
7 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: O/DDI
SUBJECT~ Involvement In Domestic

1. This memorandum responds to the DDI's request for a listing of any questionable involvements in domestic affairs. I do not believe that CRS is doing anything that a reasonable man could construe as improper.

2. oGRS does, of course, have several programs to acquire still pictures, movies, videotapes . 3. CRS files do not generally.bear on U.S. citizens or organizations. The biographic filebuilding criteria specifically excludes u.S. nationals unless the person has become of such major importance in the political life of a foreign country that the file is essential. To m knowledge,

onl 2 ersons so ualif

have no way to U.s. defectors

00197

1

)
SUBJECT: Involvement In Domestic Affairs

4. The CIA Library has several informal snag files intended to aid the librarians in answering the kinds of questions that they .know they will get on a continuing basis. An appointments file is a collection of 'clippings on appointed federal officials: who holds what job when and what is his background?
fil~s are a coll~ction of folders on of organizations and a' few p~ople with intricate organizational links. Any sort of extremism is grist for these particular files., And a fe~ persons, e.g., Rap Brown and Eldridge Cleaver, have dossiers consisting almost exclusively of clippings from public media. These files are unclassified and consist mostly of clippings from the public press: U.S., foreign, underground, scholarly. The extremist a variety 5. I am not aware of any other kind of involvement in domestic activities that is not related to development of techniques or logistics or legitimate traininr of CRS personnel.

n. c. EISENBEISS Director, Central Reference Service

00198


. '.

/ .' ~,


/
MORl DoclD: l45l843

00199


. ,.:.'.:, .. "


,., Ie tionable NP C Pro ects:' :.. ,"0I!
"
..
I
:.
/' . 1. Leaks of Jack Anders ....
I. . :~ '.
In January 1972. NPretapes of"a Jack Anderson s
Iserial ntiIPher's of GrA do
..
.
' :' was.~evB1.,on WIG through
','
." .
-,;' . ,2. The PoppY.Project

erformed Im ze enhancement techniques on~'IV
0'1'1. The· P se was to try to identify . ents Jn And rson's possession. The requesthe Office 0 .Security.·" '.

." "0
.;
: •• f. .•

,~.~IC.I~'

p;oVi.ded the' ernces"of ne PI

to ~sis,~

an interagency' , .'~ .

effort to dttect poppy cu1 ivation. II addition the Center has provided the QIDtractual mechanism support0 the Bureau of Narcotics and

Dangerous Drugs for a mu~t spectral c:r p study by a private company. "

• 1
','

.:

..

'! .. ...
I : ~"0
': " '.:, ,;"

,NPIC has been request to provtde nunber of 1001<5 ,

coverage for special purpo es•. F.xc:--upl - Include:
at domestic
::
". ,',, .: .,
.,. .'":"
':f" ' ' ~ Santa Barbara 01 Spill . ,.
, - Los Angeles Earth ake " ,I'·. '"
. - Sierra Snow (£10 threat),
- Current Mississi i Floods
~ :Hurricane Cammile Danage on· t e'Coas·t of the Gulf of Mexico
-. Civil Di5turhan~e in Detroit .
- 0El? u.S. Data Bas
I'",
I ••
~" ';-:!: .-;.... '.. " .. ; .~" ': .. .
:."
.
.t , • . -,
"':
. .
"
..
I . 00200'
~.
oozo~
MORl DocID: 1451843
8 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: DDl
SUBJECT Sensitive Activities

1. FBIS has been engaged in no activities related to the Ellsberg and Watergate cases.
2. FBIS operat~ons occasionally extend to the domestic arena. From time to t~e, FBIS linguists are made available to DDO or Office of Communications components for special operations (usually abroad) involving close-support SIGlNT work or translation of audio take. On one occasion ' recently DDO, on behalf of the FBI, requested the services of several

FBlS linguists skilled in Arabic to work directly, ..for the FBI on a short

D

term project here in Washington. The arrangements were made by Mr. Oberg

of the DDO Cl Staff~ He said the project was very highly classified and that FBIS participation was approved by Mr. Colby and the Director. FBlS participation was approved by the Director of FBIS after a check with the ADD!. Other examples of sensitive linguistic support work are help
in the handling and resettlement of defectors, the recent assignment of an employee to the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs to transcribe recordings in a rare Chinese dialect, and the detailing of another Chinese linguist on two occasions to assist in the U.'S. military training of Chinese Nationalist cadets. 3. Within its responsibility for monitoring press agency transmissions for intelligence information, FBlS publishes and distributes some material which falls in a "gray" area of copyright protection, libel,

and privacy of international communications. Pre~s services controlled

by national governme~~s and transmitted by radioteletype without specific addressees, e.g. the Soviet TASS service and the PRC's NCNA, are monitored by FBIS'and the material is disseminated without restriction. The legality qf this has been affirmed by decisions of the Office of General Counsel.

~'00202 SftJSiTIV£

, \
,!~ -. ':~..

4. The routine FBIS monitoring of foreign radio broadcasts often involves statements or speeches made by u.s. citizens using those radio facilities. Examples are statements made or allegedly made by American POW's in Hanoi~ by Jane Fonda in Hanoi and by Ramsey Clark in Vietnam. At the request of FBI and the Department of Justice, and with the approval of the CIA Office of General Counsel, we have on occasion submitted transcripts of such broadcasts to the Dep~~tment of Justice as part of that Department's consideration of a possible trial~ In such cases, we have been required to' submit names of FBIS monitors involved, presumably because of the possibility they might be required as witnesses. (In one case in 1971, an FBIS staff employee was directed to appear as an expert witness in the court-martial of a Marine enlisted man charged with aiding the enemy in a broadcast from Hanoi.) FBIS views all this

. with misgivings. Monitoring of such broadcasts is incidental and we
ru~ attribution of their news to FBIS, and we should not be considered policemen maintaining surveillance of' traveling Americans.

1
·1

IJ!;. !i.I

Director Foreign Broadcast Information Service

-2

'SfCBET00203
SENSItlVE

....J ". _:
..~-,..
.,.......
I•••~ _ _, ". •• •••• 'OM,.. ,.: -:_....... ',_. ~.~. '"
.... j '\'.

oif j l:;" .)f":~,., ..");Jic~ 1q vJr':" .1 Ir';:;~TE" - _-.__ -_-~.-.. _.'"

L;~~~~·,:~=:~~:;;;"~';;~;'·-j~~~=1;~~~~~~~Ji)~:=~;-;~~-'::~i: ~.::-';;~;;~~


I,...,~7 r. S.t:~.,> L. I 1{j\ J :-.r.Y "~1j::~:''::.·''; -/..-/'. -r-r.;»~;/ 'r··... -,:7./.'...
-


2.'
.uDO -------.--.._-.....i '.;"'" __ :..-<.;.. _ _ /1 .
:_.~";.......:j../.--~.I:;;~".:..,-:-J-i j C- -- ••....•.- • ..- ----'f" I.~··l_<.
. -.I \. . . /~~
J.

I 1
I 3. 1(; -, IY--;'jl--l

•. I
_:_..:::. .;':,. i._
, '.
--------------,.,.-,-._---,;------ ----------'--
.:
:
..

T


14.
15. fORM

3-62. 610u~oir.~~~sD""""'S"!"'E,.CRI'PIE~i---El· COIUIDEnTIAl
____ • • .. n ••• _ ••••_-:--_ ;-._. ;. _ .. _ h " '.. •• ••• • ••• ".' '."
.... .,
i_


. .:' .'.,....'.
USE.ONlY~
INTERNAl

"._ '''' .... •• _ ._. _, _ ••••••_. -_.... -~....-...~---;-~--.... --....
MORl DocID: 1451843
.. '"

1_


SUBJ}~CT : D:x;u::Jen t11.1.:10n S1.':..:Fort for Use in the , Un.lt ed Stv.tes

:.1.. As you;,:1,:;:0 awace -I.:h:1.8 c;:Jic:; pl'ov:Ldes docl.::::<cnt support for a variety,of covert activities. L.-~-----;-:;--:;-:;----;---~-:-----;;-;:;-;-------c;---'Specifi c use is110t always available to this office a.nd should pr-oper-Ly com.e from the requesting office who' can provide the details. U.S.

alias documentation use in the United Sta~es is approved by the Office of Security and normally -has the concurrence of

..Central Cover Staff or FI and.CI Staffs. Requests received by this office 'from outside the Cls.ndestin.e Service are approved by an appropriate office q:f' thaDDO.

2. A r.eview o£ this Officers document support files £or 'the period 1 January 1972 to date,indicates that the following
number of U.S. alias document r-equests wez-e fulfill,ed for 'probable use in the United States. ''l'he statistics below are broken down by requester:

OOZ05

".
\
f..
2
·-oozu~

, .-

·.Aft 0'£.1.'","'

:,.\j V tr~\:'J<Jif

"
..

. . '
! '.
4
0020'8.
MORl DoclD: l45l843

.-

I'

~~' , Director Off5 c.e of ·Tt;:chnie2.1'Sf;:1.'vice

cc :lJD/Sg:T
-:..:.
5
MORl DocID: 1451843
O'IB/D

'..
, :
". -, :

8.
,.
9.

10.' LTSD"]MPS:FUer----'--'--,·· I faJ \.'V\.t


11.
I
12. L-->

13.
14.
15.-'...

FORM 3-62


EJ C8fiFiBEliTIAL


___ R ••• _ •. , ••• __.• '.__0'._ ••_ ...... _ .... _ ._........_ ...._••._.
! .-;.
,
1
.r·.


j0 \
002.10'
OINTERNAL r .DUN(lASSIFlEDUSE ONLY
"

IL.--__I

c·'

. . . r.q-#li~v:'e) :fh,e; ]J;eputy -,Dire,ctor.. " '. '.:'.:. ::. ,1.•.: .J;..a.1;'?~~i:n-·197.1· (;DeG~m:9~r> ..
."":.f0i.::~(~B:e;,~p.a;s,~itt2b£fice> ~Be;J?a4~~nt;"O;(State, (lYfr•.RQbertJo!:U::'s;on)
....: ..:~.iP£~~a).l:Y~;~~;~~.e.,o.n.~~he;#i~~~I;rat~Q:ffi.c~·.;mignt..D.o:r:ro,v.a;'sr:!1all

~~{~:~ ~ ~~~:~~'~i~

·:I;i~'ff;,.:s;~tativ.:..e's:'of,.a£oreign:,goV'e~.nnl:ent~ .' ..
:..'":. '. :'" . ....

, .' . ", '2. I conv,eyed this.requ~st tothe.the~~hief>DI . Iand.subsequently held severa sions


.V4:1;~_1z~~esenta.tiv.es of QUI' I Pf£t:c~. 'It was~~cidedto loan
:f:tI;e:':iJ?,;a;-~~P.'o-J,':t.Qffi.·ce.',a-small cornrne-rci.a'L.r ecord'er.(Noraleo .c.a·.s·s~tte·Re·corder> Model.150), which we had in stock.

.. .... ,:0,. A' ·r..e;'p:r,~s~ntati.ve"-Qi"a~r Train~ng B~·an~h. [

,I:

land I·'de:1.i~r:e.d);be·'::Ij':ecorder.to ',lyfiss J$1:'1igh~ ~ :=zx.!.lce


~ ; I·:iiemonstxa:ted.the recorder I 5 capabi.lrti.es and::instructed ~r in its use, -She did not seem: too pleased at
tl:re:"J.?~kcirdingquality; however> the :recordex Wa's."lett with her.
. 4. On..this date (21 May 197-3) I asked Mr. Johnson. to
.qh:e:ck:.0p.the:status of.~,the r;e,~o:t'ii~1:':. He said it Was.never used

'arid c;i:elivered it"to Tr.aini:qgBranch I from.. the-Bass·port Officei'n.any 'way. I ,therefor-e..retrieved itI

0021.1.
•• I .. .... :"f-:.... _.. __.
~

".~
..~.-' .....\. "'.,
, .'
-.
".

. .:.;

"
"; ~.

-', .' ',....~' ..
.4··.·:.
-r-.
-r,
" .

.5A;~./ _.';',:;;.

. ....~ ::.:: " .

....... :'.:'.'.,:..
-:.
-.~
.
~'.

'., s.

'r: ... " .....:.
"," _t .·t... · "

., ", ':.~.'
··~:~7
.~-'
..~.
,. . -::.
.._-~_._~-_._-.~------'--~"',.. " .."---'-.,---_ .
._----_
...._. __ .•.
(~•• > .
"'-.
.
...

-._


'C--
,

..- ......

"ORM NO.. It.:;PLACCS P"O"M :lSot I


1 I .....Y "" 238 WHICH IS OQSOI.ETER_'. ._ ... . ... _ .:-=--..-_- ... ... 'I~EC'-C'-rORIGI';'CONTROL NO,

DATE: OF DOC
I
DATE REC'D

I

DATE OUT
S U S PE N 5 E .O ATE 'CROSS
~EF'~RENCE:OR
.·POINT· 0'1" 'FILING

I\

TO FROM SUBJ.

I 00212


ROUTING.

DATE: SENT

t,II I

I.

'i1 l!

'::::==:::-:-:-:::-----;.:....;-,~=~~--.-=::-=-:==-=-----I-----I---
\. COURIER NO, ANSWERED NO"REPLY 3... 1
t :

..,

./ . ...., "", .

»: ::"


' .,MEMUriMWUM FOR:..). .\ .

'Cart"Duckett brought this up and ~.aid.he is

I.

very uncomfortable with what. Sid Gottlieb is
-reporting and thinks the Director ..would be ill
Iadvised to say he is acquainted.with this pro
gram. Duckett plans to scrub i.t down with
'd
Gottlieb.but obviously cannotdOft this after
noon.

1..IIBeJi"'t'vans
I .8' MaX 1973:1IFOR... Ho. 0021.3 (DATE) .


'01 REPLACES FoORM fO'IOiI ·AUG 5C WHICH MAY BE USEO~I .{C7. "
,'.
:1

e.
.. ....

.'I .',
.
.,:
;}:
","l
. -
:~
-;
~~.::~:;-.:.

..
-
_.
..
__,,_ "_ ,;.. .

, .,... ~.. .... ....• .._ ....,~,..••.:....:.:...-: c '~~~f/~-:-"'"

. ',' -.", . .....

\ .'
~-"; ., :
, : . ~ '"

....

'. ;:i·::~!~:··~·~:.:.:t'.:'.' .
...
~

.. <..;... z


L. ",.:,::_~:.,
...
»

'. -.~.~/~..-:---------


:, ':',
~ '. ~'"


......_-_.-._-_._
S:dr;c¥ G,~;_tlieb .- ...- .._.---.-.-.....-------. .-- .-.-.-...--------C:1':fO'f, TSD '---I:'.~E


------------------+-------J---------.--
-'

12.
13.

14.
15.
'.

00214

FOIfM

3-62 610us·io~:.~~~us 0 SECRET oCONFIDENTIAL oINTERNAL ·0 UNCLASSifiEDUSE ONLY


::,,;,,~
~i ••t;
11EMORANDU~....1 }"OR: .Deputy Dir c c tor for ,Science & Technology ,

1. 'I'echni ca.I Services Dlvision.ls charter (CSI 1-8) requires that it provide technical assistance to both CLl\. operations and other activities as may be directed by tl-..c DeputyDir ector for Operations. 2. Over the years the chief non-CIA recipients of this support have been the Depart:ment of Defense, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, I:mrnigration and Natura.lization Scrvi.ce , Departrrienf of State, United States Postal Service, Secret Service, Agency for Intez-nationa.I De'veIopmerrt, and the 'White House. ,_, 3. 'While vary-ing widely among the,different recipients, these services have included training and rnateriaIs, and in a few instances participation in the fields of audio and visual surveillance', secret writing and related cornrnunicatiorrs, .per sona.I protection. aHas docurnentafiou.and questioned docu:ment exa:mination, disgutse, conceahnent de-vices;' electronic beaconry, illicit narcotics detection, and counte;r-sabo'tage!ter;rorisln. 4. In :most instances requirements for-fhis-rsuppor-t are "recerved by TSD through higher echelons (Office of the Director' or Deputy Director for Operations). Urile s s the service involved is a t r ivia.l or. continuing one, the request is referred to the Foreign Intelligence Staff Departmental Coordination Group for coordination and approval at the appr-opr-ia.te Agency levels. Approval within TSD 'by the Chief of Operations or Development and,Engineering and the Chief of TSD or his Deputy also is required.

5. The .attachment lists the primary services provided to
the organizations named in Paragraph two.
E2 IMPDET
CL BY OS909~
002:15
L" ...
-. 2
(/; .; -r ,
-,/,1

'l .. ,J

6 .. J::.::;::::tl)CC of f,,);.~;;,:·d ~-l:·:t.~o:1:!.lldr:..;ntity'·~~lt"tz!r:\.:1-!t:11~{)11by
'),3D):; c or i rolI'..... t.... -"""-';'/"';"'.f '0 1''/0 b roa d cr;",-·,·;.,l.·J .....,." {V-,-. of,..... ~, 'J i. t I..':;) 1. .. ~. ~ i: C
z,:(:i: C~ ~ I': J.; <11H:1 ty pc of d C'C"t.il :'li": ~::La ti(,. -1 r (":tl;':(:3 i·(~d.. .:\ r ,;,;r.1 ~.! » s t
for dl~n;..c d arca dO(,,1l1Ylerd~i.t~ollfi crn a. D})O Avca j)iv·1:::::")jl1.;;
!10110r(~d ;:t[t:er p rcpe r vaIi-Jarion. }""'rec ...vorId (~I.}-.-·t.~:"C(·:'l!'.\i.?.Ol1.
Ina>," l'equil'c ~OD'le extra coo:c('E~~ation!loWGver. \

7. Unless ordered orhczwis e by higher Agency au~~".)rity.' no U. S. docurriezrtatiori is issued by TSD Headquarters without, prior coordination with the Office of Security. and the Central Cover Staff. TSD Regional Bases require at least the va.Iida-, tron of U. S. documentation requests by the COS. or his designated r cpr e sentative , of ~!lC requesting Station. Because it could be usedl . ': lno U~ S. Birth Cer'tiflcate 'IS Issued WllhOOL approval 0 me uud, ' via Central Cover Staff. Backstopped major credit cards are issued by Office of Security, not TSD. 8. Provision of forged documentation to non-DDO requesters, whether they be CIA or other Agency requesters. always requires' approval of rrori-v'I'S'D offices. Support to the military for instance would be validated by PI Staff/Departmental Coordination Group at HeaCiquarters or by the COS overseas having responsibility"for coordination of the operation. BNDD requests a r-e coordinated' with DDO/NARCOG. Requests for documentation oflnimigration and Naturalization Service is coordinated via the Alien Affairs Staff. 9. Authentication items are issued on .a loan basis and must be returned to TSD oracco~ntedfor. After any documentation has been issued. TSD'retains photographs and records of such support until the documentation has been returned to TSD. If the material is not returned 'after a reasonable time. the requester is z-errrinded of the outstand-ing documentation.

r" ' I - . ,/.., '

A
1/

/;'
1'/ , ':, >:/--." --II...: '/:.....-..' .. ,~i.(' -7"";'
,K..../_ ","...,
~ ~ :,.,... -:;;
Attachment .; SidneY,.,Gottlieb
D'istribution: " Chief
o & 1 - Addressee,w!att Technical Ser'vices Division
00Z1.6
-.
Doourrrerrts , di s:bu1.se,'~O)1Ct:·;:r.J.11·~._~n.tdev-!.ces 7 Se';:l·c;t "\..vriting,
f~~lr.~S ar.d sC1.!.lSi count e r ir.:... j..ir g ericy (~{:(l CQ1.1:r:.tl';X ~~2:.bo!:~.ge ccur s e s

have beeufurniahe d to all i.nt c Il.igen c c t=10111.i;~11tS of tl1e Depa r trnorrt of Defense and certain eLerrrents ofthe Special E'or c e s , All requests are eoordinated with the FI Depar-trnent.al, Coor di.nati.on Group'at . Headquarters and ,...rith the Chief of Stations ovezs ea s , In turn these elements furnished TSD with exernpl.ar s of foreign identities documents, foreign cachets, foreign intelligen.ce secret writing. systems, foreign' intelligence .concealment devices. SeleCted audio r equir ernent.s have beerr.furni shed overseas for CI -type cases.

Fe-de-ral Bureau· oi Investigation

.At th~··r.~questof the FB(we cooperate with theBur~au in a fe"\v audi.o-,Eiu:n-eillance oper ations against sensitive foreign

targets i~:t;b;~·.UnitedStates.

BU:i:".eauof.Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs

Beacons... cameras, audio and telephone devices for ove::seas:op~r.ations,identi.ty docurr.ent s , car-trailing devices, SRAC, flaps and 'seals and training of selected pe.rsormeL . . responsible for use thereof has been furnished this Bureau. All.requirements are sent to DDO/NARCOG for coordination with area divisions and for action by TSD If appropriate. Requests Overseas are coordinated with the COS or his designee before action by TSD is taken.

I'rnmigration and Naturalization
CI analyses of foreign passports and visas, guidance in

developing tarnperproof alien registration cards,I II. Ihave been furnished the SerVlce.Requests


are forwarded dlrectIy to TSD for coordination within TSD if technical, with the FI Departmental Coordinati.on Group if operational.

00217

',;;.
D:;])arhilel'J!; of
__••
_
OM "'_ '_'_'h__ "
_ ••.__.......
• _
S:,a~:c._

. "erl;cJ~r:l'''';·:.l :S!:·"1:1·.; •..s :~·:.1.i:.I:..;..n~·:~ f;~l dr-;'Ij·:.·}.oi,;1r.tg a nC\\t.TJIli~\;d. :~..:~: ..",I::!; J.'?d.:~~·l)Oj...t J i.~.....~ 'J nf.::3 L,f :GT ,-:j :~ 11 :-.;:-,\ -s~:t) 1.;:5, I,.::::. r ..;;1. I ?::.'l,);:iug
:1 J .,1 ~:ler~Ionnc c I.:>::~ ~ L·:'" :';l (~)f~;'> .::011 s) f(JL ../'-,:U":~~':::,s S;;.do s havc been

:;:i.."i~)~)lietl tb e St.:?~:e D':·:e,-:..:rf"::1:1c::ut. In a(~c1it.:i'011,a:naly s e s and

(;;:-~posure of b l a c1, l:..:.d:.t(:r f)l:-e:L"'=1i:io:.ns a 6 c.i n s t tIle Urii.te d States


:,.l.b:r.o~~dare rriad _~~.11 gj:~:11)11ics j:";''';':;!:Le:rflJ::::.ts ar ~o:r~::."2_:L"'(!r::d

to J.'SD for f'urtlver":;.::()r'~~~;';·.·:t~.!)11 -·,,::!:'·.~rl 1}1e :81.,.:-is10n. 'I'he Depar-trnent of St.a.te i\Lt:nish~s (::i~j:'-;2h:,l'S of ,foreign pass?orts, for eign visas andintl-:eFast passports orr.a priority basis.

Postal Seryice
The Office of Chief Postal Inspector has had selected
personnel attend basic surveillance photographic courses, hasrbeen furnished foreign postal information and has been the .

recipient of letter bornb analyses, furnished

I I

t==]typewriter ana.Iys e s , Requi r ernent.s are coordinated with the DDO and~DDO:lEA. The, Post Office 11:asfurnished TSD '

with exempl"ars of letter bornbs ~irdI

, . an arrangement wrrn crrel ....OS~ Uillce ". IWe al~o have
1-0 eXdHlute .'J.nd reinsert a 'lo,\y yolUIne~f certain foreign mail arriving in the United Stat.es.,

Secr'et Service

Gate passes, security passes, passes for Presidential campaign" ernblern.s for Presidential vehicles; a secure ID photo systern have been furnished this Serv-ice. Blanket approval

.' .
for graphics support has been granted to the Deputy Dir ectoz--for
'Operations. In each case TSD requests approval from the noo.'
U. S. Agency for International Development
-We furnish instructors to a USAID-s onsored,Technical
Investigation Course (Counter Terror) at
- 2
0021.8
\.

(.~, .' ; • • I

White E·...ruse\ .

Statiolll::r y, spedal H1ClllOrarJcla, 11"101d5 of the Gz oat
~31::;;"1 have b e en f·\:.: r}1.i.:=;lJ!:;Q th I:: ~?oci2..1 Secr\~ta~r'/. r:Plj~ }:'.;~!1.lt)r
J)i.cecto1.'" for Ol).:~:r:~t~C:)l1S 1::; '.~·'~)J~1.~i·;d of -;"b...;~eMrecr.::.i:L""(;1"(ft'3nts.

Police Respresenting Washington. Arlington. Fairfa~ld
Alexandria .

During the period 1968 -'1969 a series of cla s s es reflecting basic' and sui:veillance photography. basic audio, locks and picks,' countersabotage and surreptitious entry were given ~o selected rnerribe r s from the above rrierrti.oned cities. Overall training was approved by the' Director of Centeral Intelligence and -in turn validation was required for each course fr-orri the Director of Security.

00219·
:...j
...
~. '"':;.' :. • OJ t.... . . ~ i ..~ ~..... ,} I

I ._~
. , .'

> i..l. :.'{ Ii ..l • -..~ ., - ~. '., '".. / :'.i

, , ~.. .

j :
•••_ ••
_.~._
.0 _., .....
~._
••••
_
... '" ..... •••
.'"
.,.
•• 4'

:<.
_••';:-•••
.'
.,...

-
..
_
...
_

.. ..

.
-,.
..

. '--'" -.'...'. ___
0': ':'(T: :'::-•.•... '::1) .:f

I.
J-------------+---f----=-j,--:---t

r.:~}~::.1.?~:1:-tti·Jl1.S of rt'SD su;)port to
other U. S. Gover nrnerrt agcncies,
-.tr.r!'Crt .
6~~-Ut~LIt ~

rr..

-


14. 00220


15.

fORM 3-62


oCONFIDENTIAL oINTERNAL oUNCLASSIFIEDUSE ONLY
-----,-- .. - ....-._••• - •••• • • • ,,_• •__••_.__ A •••• ...__... _ ._..__••••_

~rSD has h.ad a close ·.~/orking r ctationship with the F~:I e-:f;r tl:.e IJi!·st levY yca c s .·.r~1e i:",l:·I is' the on.l)r organj:;~;)..tit)ll that has been fully b rieIcd on. TSD audi o techniques a nd equiprncnt, The foHowing are situations where TSD equipment and guidance wer e involved in operations:

..
OOZ21.
MORl DocID: 1451843
/

i I'

II


; ...•.. i:,.
- '."

- 2 -

SteRR.0022Z r "';';DD,.::;:o P.33 ..-rs

8 ;~·0.y 1:973'
EXGcu~ive Offic2r
SUBJECT: .Contacts with Domes t Lc Police Organiza:t.ions

1. In Dec. ,:ber 1~63, July 1969 and December 1970, SDB provided ba.sic countersabotage familiariza.:tion training for selected members of the Washington metropolitan area police departments. The traini?g vlas. given at the Fairfax County, police pistol and rifle range. Authorization for the trainj,ng carne from mjp and Ch:tf~f, Office of Secur-i·ty.

2•. o~ occasion dpring the 'past few years, under the

auspices ·of ~he Law Enforcement Assis~anceAdministra~ionof the Departmeht of Justice and with the approval of CI Staff and Office of.Sec-urity, SDB provi.ded -c:raining and familiarization ~o police officers of several domestic police deparDuents'in the uses of the Explosives Residue Detection Technique and Trace Metals Detection Technique. These techniques had been decla'ssi£ied and are ·currently available to the law enforcement community. The National Bomb Data Center pUblishes periodic: guidance in their uses.
, .. 3. In order to augment the SDB mission responsibilities in.the field of countersabotage and counterterror, .SDB officers have in the past two years visited, under appropriate covers, the explosives disposal units of the New York City police department, Dade County (Mifu~i) Florida Dept. and the Los Angeles Police Dept. Also, in March 1973; two SDB officer.s attended ·.the· Explosives' and Ordnance Disposal Conference in Sacramento, California, sponsored by LEAA~ When the recent letter bomb menace began in September 1972, our liaison with the NYCPD bomb squad paid off in that we had complete in

formation

on

letter bomb construction in hours, 'enabling the


~gency to make worldwide disseminatio "thin a da .

00223


i cT.:?11t, j. f 5.c a t:: t:~ 11.seci-et S (~j."v 5~c o
,

Ij.1 ::'1.d(1it:ioJl t'J r)l'tillt:~n:.,{ o f ' ':: .... .1.11C·1.15 r~G.s:;.:cs nnd
r>:.:~b J..(~!:1~3; ·i\~)·}) : ..::~:; ill :-:'1) s~11:'1)1.5rd -~;:e
\\:i t h SC~~:'1e 1J.S. ,1.]. :.::.s ;~:oc u ·t:J;l.-~ :1..t i .:-1i1 :

00224

...
. .~

f"d:C

L . '.P::.:! r.i.:.·~.t :'(';;-',::11: of ';~:':(;]:);:i( ;,1 "i.·!i~~(:';l;B hy r:r:.';·i).';g ?.r~!"h::h 1\·~~.:.; ·~::~":.!:.:cte(i (1.1,.:c5 i:a=;le·t-·\,.....~~,::.l ""j' Oct ober - 26 :-~:.".. ,.::::G.t':I"· J.~16'8. 'fhe J"oJ.l,c:·:ij·ig sch\:I:~tl:J,.] ,'}lfl ::::'i)jCi.:ts :·.-(;l'"C i.~~·.C;tJ iiI the.tniining of s Lx pc::,lJc:::.:s of the 2';c:t:c:(~polit;li1 PoLi.ce ' Dcpartr-cnt ,

A. 7-].8 OctobeT - Sljr~·,~ptitf~\Js Entry .
C,:· .. f."te~nt 0 1':· ~3 ub j c:ct ~~ :.:::Lh.t :

1. Familiarization and identity of American locks.
2.
Hetho·d
. .
of :il2.nipulatioH of Locks .

3. Methods and techniques of conducting Surreptitious Entry Survey.

~~

21-29 October - Photo Survei11anc~ Content of Subject taught:

'I. Fimiliarization with cameias: 'Pentax Spotmatic, Leica, Nikon F, Robot and Polar~id.

2. Lens, telephoto and wi de angle.
3. Exposure Meter, Tripod~; Bowum, etc.
4. Film, film, processing and print processing. S. Document copy exercises.
6. Night Photography and nigh~exercises~ . 7. TV·Surveillance. C.

18-23 November - Audio Surveillance Content of Subject taught:

1. Microphones, wire Lmped.arrce.s and line amplifiers. (Shure MC-30, Sennheiser "MM-22, RCA - BK - 6B andRCA BK-12a all commercially available)

2.

RF commercial transmitter. (Research Products, Tracer Inc., Scientific Research Corp.)

00225


.:s. :~. t_,_ i. ..::S. (:.;~; 3,:.. i)~ ;. :.d (>.', .. '~ t.'j;~ l ...I. ~}~ -'l
···.t1 >.~ ;. L] '.' ~" ..c t , ·:·~",::\:t r'i~ll):-.)
.1
:rC 1. r',P!: :'..•~ 'r': ~)s. ((~~.":~'I)J0·~.C ;:··-'·t~~::l :::.},,-- 2 l~"~:j 1.l,' ". :!t"r •

v-: 11:i r: 11 f:\':·.il:·1;]e ~'l) .~,..'\.:c~;·":~:·~\;r1t '~'."7{.l l· ....c -,:~:'. fo)."c.:"Ilt.:~ ... ~ i.~",1...:5) .

5. RC:C: ....·:rI?!..: .. ::; (:!\':r,c:x.-GOl-2 Stereo, ~~_.:;; .)TC 'T-~:04
?,~(}',a, :":~','_:1' "~OGOL,
all CGTi:J;1(;.rd.al1y obt,:-,5]'~:.~.:)J.~).
end i\'all t,,::s t or f: t5.on.

1. This prDblem entailed an operational cicrcise agalns t t hr ee of our S;:,fc-sties. TheStUr}(-71tS had to survey , case and pee t rotc t1~,(:se Locat i cn s using surreptitious entry, photography and audio surveillance,.

2.
------,All
been terminated.

atl--------------------------


. .
II.

After this first NPD group other police departments personnel trained using the identical safe sites and

enp LoyLng the s arne s ubj ect matter and commercial cqui pmerit as i.ndicated above were taught on the f oLlowi.ng dates'.The Fairfax Police Department and Arlington Police Dep~rtmente Date - 21 October - 10 December 1968. Six officers, 4 from APD and 2 from FPD. III. In 19~9 additi~nal offi~ers from the Metropolitan POlice
DeparL~ent, FaIrfax PolIce Department and Arlington Police Department received identifical training as that stated

• abo~e: .In total 24 police officers were trained in ourfacIlItIes.

OOZ26


.J, . J.,-/ . : ·1 ..J >" ·C: - . . i,I '.'. -.;.
• •• i." ~ ... .. . .~.,; .:~.:.". ,.", ",: l

~ ..., ,. . ',' .:" ,.'
7.
Ia:---:--~---J-------l---+-,-..---l

..'610 USE rRfVlOUS ~ oCONFIDEHTrAl o'"noH' [xl~


'- 1 ..'~J.' ~\., '\

... ........
,,
:

-


_. '- __'.

~ --- ...'


r.'
._-
.--_.~~
,--..;.
1. ... \:... . c. " ...
-'
(\ ~-;:~. \,
"---.

c '-;

--,

-C~,-,.,

00227

INTERNAL
USE ONLY UNCUSSIHED
MORl DoclD: 1451~43
~.;::.:~.~:--·~.n~:):··I F(jR.: .~~;.~:,~jtl ·':i:t·i...~~:t.c·.t" ~:Cl." Sc·j '·.J.;I.~.~ z"._~li
T(;t.:!·;.:' 1,::
Ic,sY
SUBJECT

Repeated Survey of ORD for NonForeign Intelligence ~ctivities The, 7 May survey has been repeated and refined with respect to all ORD services or dealings with
other'a~encies on domestic, non-foreign matters. In
~ddit~on, this report covers all our'acti::rities.deallng wlth the research 2n~ develop2ent of lnteillgence

eq~ipment for foreign ~se

the United States and information. Again, Khich has been tested in
mi ghz have collected domes t i c each-member of ORD available today was asked either. directly or "through his supervisor to provide the above requested information,
vhether he was directly LnvoIvedOT not. 1\'e have used'all diligence to search our records available to us during' this' time period to. ensure this is a complete and factual :list. .

I.· I


~ayre .,5te3enS .
Director of Rese.arch & Development

Attachments:
1 Contacts with Other

2

Government Agencies Domestic Tests

00ZZ8
-,
CONTACTS WITH OTHER 'U.S. GOVER~~ENT AGENCIES WHICH
COULD OR HAVE RESULTED IN USE OF CIA-DEVELOPED
. TECHNOLOGY IN ADDRESSING'DOMESTIC'PROBLEMS
Executive Office of the President

ORD represents DD/S&T on the R&D Sub-Committee . of the Cabinet Conunittee for International Narcotics ..Control that is concerned with research support of 'the narcotics control problem.

(Dr. Leonard Laster, OST)
Office of Telecorrununications Policy

Techhiaal surVeill~nce.cotintermeasures and

physLcaI s ecurLty .i.nformation \·ra s exchanged ,dththem. 1,

Bureau of Narcqtics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD)

Techniques and equ Ipmen't for navi gat Lor; and tracking was discussed ,with BNDD.

IIBNDD)
IDi'it,_')
w
e r e

p r cce s s e

d
t
n
_
~l'li

n ,..
'1.'",
't}t

r> '-I. l. . ..... _ Lr

The 50 1.1:(( > .' 0 ~ t, I.'::: t c'l.irC~ \.;a s u t°i.:·::(L!J ~·ti:..
L\ BNDfij
~, .. 002.cg
, ~

I

MORl DocID: 1451843
'..

-


iJ. S. (',. ;-.:; ~'."-"':'lt
~~ I.;
:;,!..i 11 c;d .;;1 1.:s C of CTAD:.:: "~.-.:~ 1C iii,.:(1 '.1'_' c': J: (~ 1 iJ S=, y'" .; 11. '\ ·.~,~1 :t' .....: ::; .~ ~1.S Dc=--:~ t:st.: l: i"',,....]-;1:::(;1$

r.:-:T:n (cG::lt 1 d ) \
::~hDD ··.·e.5 given ·P~·"'TI.i-:,S.\C':l i.n tho L,J]. of 1972
°t.o :c"~r-(:i\"'(~ r~1.·~·:1)o::::'1.1s ':E'}~(::1 ,:. t:~i~I:·..r::,:.' ..c, Tn c , , c:c:i:.(:(::Ti1l11g
a. Radar PcopLe Dctec t ord~::\ ,·;J.t::i}(·~l for (;:~o.

IBNDD)I I

'-----------,-----'~NDDJ
USIB Technical Surveillance Countermeasures Committee

Continuing contacts wcire maintained with the Lnt el t i gence COTIIIi1Unity regarding technical surveillance
countermeai~rs and physical security. This exchange of infol~ation, reports,·and equipment has been con
ducted under the auspices of

State, FBI~. Secret Service, NSA~ DIA,. Army, AF, and
USIB TSCC and involves.
Navy.
State Department.

Two contracts for development of countermeasures
techn~ques were funded jointly. with the State Department.

2

00230

-.

~~

.


: . . .~. ~iJ 9,:;J:r:l': Ccnt:~ I •. : s L'3~:1 (~"i..!: or t,rIt S. G~:'·& ':.";0 __, ::::",It' ;"..~.g '.:;"'11": j ,'." S .:;r~'l:lr:}l (~·~··]f.1 ~)'l~ :Ii~\"e l".:(,.:.~:! ";-,:::<} TIl ;.~~e of (~J.:\'])C:..~~\:·l,:,i."jcll ''cq<.;;",.;1f)}.I,:g>rj 11 ..\·~~!:r~s s ij:.i l)C';j~~;.:.:;t -;..c

P;'I~' 1"..1. ..:) S

S{):::e of rhc l\n(~ I.:l1:.:)·~·~~."COL :L:.~~) e.:;. ~ S~:..-i.·c.~~~l~~]l
~~i\""er L,zl:··_~.i.;.~,:tory·, a r c ~~·l.~·;~l;i)·.ctc~(.l =---=y t~l,,:\ to c....·~~Je.]..ou

radio nuclide sampling a~d detection techniqu~s ~nd devices. These Laboratories have used sampling techniques developed fOT CIA to measure cems nuclear
pl ant; r0J.(;3.Ses.

,. (Ivlr . B. Benson, ABC)

At the request of.AEC Security Officer, Mr. Richard Cowan, the walls of the office of the Chairman of the ABC (then Mr. Schlesinger) wc r e X-rayed. The operation

occurred,one evening and Has an attempt to resolve some
Ianomalies',.created by the us.e of the )

. I<---L---


(Mr. Richard Covan, AEC) . I
-------Lal" Enforc'ement Ass1.stance Agency (LEAA)

Reports and information about the ORD-developed Adhe-sive-.Restraint, Non-Lethal Incapacitation System were made available to Department of .Just Lce , .LEAA in

August 1.97"2. If zhey developed the syst em, it would

be used for civilian crowd and riot' contro.l.
(Mr~ Les Schubin, LEAA)

Technical surveillance countermeasures and physical .security infcrmation wer e exchanged wi·th· LEAA•


.I'-------


3
00231.

. '. ;.,

...,. ~ ~'~'::. '.'~:' .'. . ,.....' .. -: .,' ~ .' .. :";:'
.:'.
.: . '

:;-..:.... : ':. ::':'. <:.<-:'.;.' .. '.
. ".
" ...', ;'::,:'.... ,
". "_.-:;,.-'"
~~:...;:~:fJ ..:f:·r: (~,:·l1i:,;C1.:; ~.'::;·;~11 (.J;.~_,:.~.. iJ.S. t'~\~':·..t·\r:::·~i.";~1.t ..\i::".~:·~cIcs
1'.1dt:h CC:i)J.tl -:>1" E:.,·,-e ~~(~S:.TItJ·<l In Us e oC.CIA-·
T~ Co,:-C!Lc1"': d. r~; C" ;:.TAO1.:..1~~}'; ~1 ~\.: ~ ~'.! :,....:.;S S 1.;1 g DQ;:1C~ t ic
.ProbJ.'e:',.\S
~~~:::~:.~1~:.\lEl.
,:::::..:..::= =--- - '.·15· 1",,,';',,,,</sub>

...... .: '::.:" ",~L"? . C. _.C"-:i~·:.1·;J]·""-·d "0 '1""(';1~1l"V "'·~n·"'1--j·J'\"'~'.A.';lll. •


-;:0 a .5,.,....,..,-~"'J.7-s...,.t~J".n-'---=:~7'{)).· }:1 '1,.1 J. a t :~-:1g t 1'1e J_ I" ::~~D 1) '.t." t~.:g i' ~t::1 :-:_11d o '1.'£; t;:n 1.Z r1t 1 (111

in arrtLc i.p a t i on of JL!,C cs t cbl ishncnt of the110\'; drug

enforcement administration.I.th:·The request for his services


was made.byl Agency's Narcotics Coordina.t or. I\Jr.jtdlSC1.J,SS(~(itEG r cqucst and cleal'cd the

detailing tnrougn ''''. COlby. I

'-----------
Customs/Treasury De~3rtl~ent
Technica~ discussions i~eTe held ~ith'Customs relating

to detecting illic'it ni ght.ti.me aircraft intrusions over the Il, S. -MexLco border.

(Nr, Ha.rtin Pera, Customs)I

Alc'ohol' & Tobatc'o "Tax DiY/IRS

, .


. . . " About five -years ago, assistance ,,,,as ,..r equest ed in doraest.Lc'<s.ear'ch of "mocnshdne" stills using:.·.~IA infrared scanne.r-s;"...·This ' ...as turned down. , ..

.-~------
Secret .Servi'ce

..We·have had numerous discussions ivith .the .'Secret Service" .rega.rdf.ng navigation and tracking ~.:t.echniquesand ·equipment.

I---;---..,..,-------
OO~32
,',' ,', .. .~.: ~. ~ :" .".
.

::.:..: .. : _ .. ~., • 01••_ .,.'..
..... :' ':,' -:..

~ .., : .,. '. . :'
:.~LrB.]j:(~~r:· (:o~j,t.·'\:1:s ~·:.i ;~';l f)lflU): "!J .. S. rt;·...i..·!·:.!.~(:r'l.t· ;\~:~(:l:C.·i.cs
~·th.5.,.:.h C,,:'·,!l<.l O£' i'I~::\:-c' ~;::·)t.lJ.tj':(.1· Tj1 Use of Cl~\

. Jlr··,;"':.~ .·····(:·(·1

T ..:•.·.
1
....:..
'" 1" -" _ _.I
,_.()1.•...".l.·,\.r
.in.. , ......:~"~/1'J"i""()"SJ"'1'fr.•"1~P"I·it··"·.1·';C
~ ~ "-'-0 -: : .......... ...- .

. p:.:.(.hl,....ls· ."..
.'. ~ .". .'. .

. The xes ults of our r r-scor ch \;'Yfk in the de t ect Lon

t,of-, :.-,,<>Is I I':'e"l';'; ·)·:-,·.:-,~·,~<-r.(] 1.,','0 '(:,\.!\ .!=,,-,- -"'S ':'.-, ~ us ejJ~4:: (..c; t, v ._ J!...} .... \.. _ ... -l..... •.... VJ.. i::'!"'/" :.:.~ :"}':- •.• v_\-'


in the de te-"C-~-'~l:-l-0-n-of hi.j e.cke:c i·;'.:-:::'_pc;~ls.

National Institute ofJIe~lth'r~~H)

: ",At the -requcs t of O~D, .oes assi.gned 'avst af'f··.technician to undertake to wri t e a computer program for·th.e: Wiss,vesser·Line."Not.ation·CWLN) chemical notation method; -: , 'This work was

done cf.n coope'rat Lon 'Kith NIH.
. ,..
(Ms,' ·Coniver· NIH)<br/> ....
. .,)

',: 1----'-'----


AT·ms ClintI'o! and Disarmament Agency (.~eDA)

.. D" ORDmet frequently lvit]~ ACDA pei-so'n~el i~ order to . ture ORDfs "~1YCW research pr ogramsv t o 'Support_.ACDA ,needs , .

.. '. ":·'1
;" . :..... .. -:--------• :. o' '. • .'j
Environmental Prot-ection Agency .(EPA)·

.·Technical 'information relating to detection· of radio nuclides 'in the environment was exchanged with them.

. .....~.
(Mr ~ .· ..Char-Les 'Weaver) EPA)

'..
.....

". ..~...;::::.. . .,

I:· .....,...



....:...' . ~;,".;.

.~
...". '" " ," ".

::~:'StJr:.(:'l'9: . (~\~;:.J.t:,:,"·;-S :;·j.';·11 .C:·;.:~:;.JJ." U..S. O.~;\i:-;,~·.:·::lt ,:".~:';;:·(:·;.t:·:5
1,'h.1Ch C':··.l:l.rl1.11' ;r,iVe n.:~s\)~'i:f;d In r~,c 0f ·C1.:\
,.,!. \·1_ ··,·1·: ;-:c'.... f' '. ')r .._'i;l ,.~..d(.3y.(~_ _•.~S] :".' j:.! ~{..... _ . .,...···5t -1,."-,./C..~\.;'· i.•• "',' ; ••••_ _ '1'1....' .. _

P:co:)} c;;;S
h·1·1r·31 dI sc.uss Lons ·........J· ... t.!··lg ." o lJ'--i-lg TH~ Sc ..·q ...)-;·pg'"·trf~...t

: cqui~W~!~~~J t:;':~1 e';:~:.;~:t.'·~'~;li~~, 2·J.-:':·~~";d· 1;5.:::•• i~/~J S';3~~;i.t<l~-;"7 ';;~d. fill have been conducted. .


""
. '. (Mr. ·Gene James,
EPA)

'. I


Federal Bureau ~f. In~~~t}~~ation
At their r-eques t , we described ..-Imagery Enhancement
·..t echn.iques germane to removing dds t or t Lons from some

.·photogr·aphy. they had on an alleged' ·bank robber•...Request for specific support in processing .the .imagery ..,·ras· turned down,

.

'.
'..:Secret Se~:vice

'. 'FBI ':
lJ:S. Customs

.... .1. ItO't~l contact ..with oth:r.agencies

an terms' of assl.stance 'Inth dome.st Lc operat.tons has be-en. ;·in. the ;field.. of audio survei Llance -c.ourrtermeasures ~ arrt
hijacking~ or drugs.i.>." .

.. '(Mr. Robert Burnell, SS)(Mr. Thomas Allen~ FBI)
(Mr. Martin Pera , Customs)
.' '1 I'
.. NASAand USDA 1 ,.:---,==========;_

We have an onzoi.na DrOQ"ram .' ItoI

,"

I

eartn resources ass'essmen t s ~

····IL..--~


6
00234
j.: :
.•..
:;':
:, .
.... '.:". '.


'1'1.,,:> "')("7"'{""
.... J ..."" _i.::> .... _ ..)


. '-.
i,

.~~:>1.. •. ..

,y,···'··-, arinz.:> a.. 1···"I·!·(,-"·''':~.J- I'o r an ·e·'-u":';rl·-· mental

program
to aid in
\:~
6st~fi2ting·theSovi~t wheat

.crop. A part of the .information would be obtained fTOfu a satellite Lau.ichcd for ot her an·uo1.iJ1ced"p:cograi;Js. Ground
t rut.h data h'ill be collected0]1 Nor t h Ainer i can c.rops ,

'u.s. Department of Agriculture' a'h.'d".Bureati 'of Narcot:ics
a~a :gan.,gerOll.? D~'u~s

.CIA has requested the es t ab'L'i-shmerrt o.f a t";o-acre 'plot of opium poppies at a USDA· r esearch site in Washington

... ". s t at e , to be used for tests of photo-trecogn.ltion of opium poppies ...

I--------------------------~--:-::-------:-------:~
·.·.:·Army~ MilitaT'~ Police Agel'!5:YLJ-t~ ':Gordon .Air Force, 01; ice o:t. the Illspe'ctor Ge':ieT3l

. '.:..:Army, Offlce: of·Prov'ost Marshall General

.. We have exchanged technic·al··:sllr\n;illance ..c~untei.·
measures and physical security information with them.

_I

. ·U. S.· Army Rocky' Moun·tarn Arse'naT, Ne\\rport· Army AmTIit,'nit'io.n Plant~.ToeIle Ordnance Depot

Do'RD tested environmental' samples from testing~
sto~age,and production £acilities in the U.S.
-_--:.-_--:.---:.-_--

.1_

00235

.
.....
-:~

..
-:;:':

... ~ . .

~
.

. .'•
',' :.::. ~' .

.

,~rj;~:! .....';....._.

-.'..' {'"


<... :.
.: . .

. : ..;".'

. ",'.
-;.'

, c.c s .(~\~I; \ f. ~~ C.is' ~!l:i t.11t.~ ';, :icr . L1ff S. f?ov .:j " .. :,"\~_'''::t"::'."j i:.~) :~
-,--'. ·,':'}1-i.CJl t\·~~;.1.l1 IJ'l' f!\l1,"~"·Fr~,~';~;.J'rc:J In LT$(::j[ (YA;)(.v(.~ Ij;,:.\··(l 'f"~'l~I~~lolog}r .in ..~:1 ,"'1 ~;~·.s~·ng ~;}:)l::stic

F10!:Jl,::,.jS· '."

.:

u.: S.._~~E~~_LB_~_$.,~:~:_~~.:?_~...h_~:,:?~~:~~l~.! . .


__~Do;:UJ i~:; .';!Jilr5.:1g' ,,::,·.;':-;j·?SCS 1,;:i.th:Cii~ld

u. S._ Navx,

I
u.s. Coast Guard


. Abnut six years ago, CIA infrared equipment was
made available for USCG tests t.o evaluate IR as a means£Oar night search of life boats. . .
(then-Lt. James McInt osh ," USCG)

Sa.n Mateo County Sheri£f's' Of£iceI


ORD conducted polygraph tests qn.a11·app1icants. Polygraph security findings were compared with the Sheriff's own security f~ndi~g5.

(Sheriff)
A study was.'made on .con-men techniques and assessment methods in 1967-68.
(Sheriff)

-, 8 00236


'.
MORl DocID:' 1451843
/"," .

':. "'.: ;:: .
;>;.~..,~:Cl': (~i>'L:.I:::=; ;:J t h JJ-':]}':;l" 1J. ~~ (',_~ '.: ·,-::·;·:"pt "'~::;':':11;.f.,::s
·>·1~11:..Jl (~.:·~!]<.l or 1:::·.... 0 Rc~;~:ll·~··rl T 1 Us c o f (':1;\
:')'
.'.·t·; :.t';. -,~.il ~r'I:'CJ~!1 (lJ.I;~:)T' ~7 11 .' :.::.~i."': :~::,;··j.~lg 1~ :~!:::..'~::~:.ic
::~.~. ,)h! _.~s

li()1-sccurity :c,:,rso;:1$, the Cl1i:~f ~\:~s :.~;':(·]r.'~ ;::-.',:'iil'''C of r.:
:1
...... I('

Y
'.> .... , ':ji'

J. ') "'\'.,J'._~_e .) J_ J. ~·~'I" J. <:: I ,.. o 1"'"'' J.J'" .•.e


.·':.it·!. L_ L.•. ,I.l.C.,.!-,L....'~' .e".:.L';t..<.tL;,.
~ Isocial groups. (1967)------------~-_--------~_
(Police Chief)
9

0.0237

MORl DocID: 1451843
":.': :...;
.... " ~•...• : ••_. I
."
. ~ ",
AGENCY

DOMESTIC. TESTS FOR RES~ARCH AND'DEVELOP~ffiNT

.' :~:. . ':'

..
..:
'"
:~.,
"

.
',': .:.
',. -,EFFORTS:

1. ,As a normal part 'of ORD f S efforts in the research and development of equipment and techniques'

.Eor Agency" appIdca.ti ons .Ln foreign intel1igence~ we :''f~,conduct experiments 'and tests in the United States..'~:" . :.~.


-: Clearly, the design and development of our intelligence equiprnents can .be done more economically and more securely in this country. Although most of

".the tests of our R&D equipments are performed in .closed laboratories or, in secure areas simulating the foreign environment, some.of the tes t s and exper L
merrts, 'of' necessit y , "reveal domesti c information.

. .
2. A revlel,,"of··.t:he' surveI t Lance equipment or
-techni.ques which have at some' time or other been
exposed t.O domestic~.tes~ing is as f'ol Lows : .• ',1.•• ,'"
,:,'
.', :.'

a. Laser Probe ~ About 1967, ~he laser

probe' developeCft.)}r~-ORDwas tested by TSD in .:', .'San Francisco under"very c l os e-Ly controlled conditions. '. The: .OR}), ProjeC,tOfficer lvit nessedportions'" of the "test." 'Recordings that we r e

made of Laser probe ;·ou·tput were -ca'refuTly controlled' as cLassLffed material and. it is believed. ·that the.:.tapes. have long since been des-trayed ~';.:.' ..

- About
"r-----'-~---'---=------'---'------J
e

III tercepts we r e " ..\ .. r: .;:.,~""-""""""""",,,....,----l des t r oyed ·s8\'-.eral y car s ago ,

"
.t')..
I'. -l'.'l·'j\ ('1'-"'\ r~-·.':"'I'·? .<, ~._\.

'.'I···..·········· :.


.
..

, ....., ..: '.:.r' ,:<.!~\;:;:~:~~~:,?:;.:: .. '. -;:'....:.':' '. ,.: .: ,'. v • •
-
...::.
.:"
." :; .....

'.:"
.-':;'" -,:


~) C:'::" t'; 5 i .i.C. ~.:.':..;: t 5 'f t)'f' .
"<; '..'! 1_Y
Jti\~i~l;..:F::·· _·".i i: ;":f.FU9.t"t s ."'::";...
\'".
C.

. ';-',~ 1r-,
.. L' <,;;J.

i"\1· •-. ~.... "'), .¥..L)(.I •. ~ ll
".":'
-,:
J_.:
~ ~...:: .; ,0, .

.'

f

t_ese are patterne or "-lli S ..·,.''''1~O]l ". .
t lie oper ation of United Statcs is

Message content
L.-...,-"--n-o~1.~n-.t-;-.-e-r~e-s--'t;-.-a-n--,--...........,.----lnot be r ecorded ;
1.S -;..:' '.
. .Over> : ..
seas testin~ is planned at a subsequ~nt date.~: .

To dat·e~·:·;,soVle domesti.c tcsting of this concept; ',' h.as .bcerrvcar-ri ed 'out at the'contractor' s ·plant~::'-.
No recordings have been made of such data.·->Ex'-··.
t r emeLy...br Lef tests .exercising U.S. and foreign

t eLephoneisys t.ems I

~ave. been ""c""a""'r""r""1.·.""e""'d""··..,..,·o"'u"t."..---~t""'O"""""'\i""'" e"""'r.....l""'f"yrr -1.n"""'?-"""t~la....I.---~-
'-=c...o=n,....,c"""e"'p=·t=.=s ~ .i:...The durat i on of 't.est i.ng was less .. ·' .
;than-one1+a.lf hour. . . .
'.' :'" .' .

.. ,~.".<i.~':~~Dther Sensor resting Examples of"\':.S'~:..: '. engirieering',development test's of special' serisocs.'. 't..rith'I1i. th~·..United states 'include and ...· ..

/ ""

n a ese cases, ~ e

testing has been used for engi.neeri.ng deveIcp
merrt .andthe content .has been restricted t.o : ." dissemination to those in Government involve.d

wit h rt.he '~mgineering desLgn, :i ...

~..'
.. ':.: .
00·239

". '.,'"
"':,~'~.:, .,::._-~ .
",'
,

..
, '
";.

" ',,' £. .Per sonaLdty Structure of DefectorsStudy (m:D-W1(reT{o-oY-:;c-o-"dcTci-nlIll~-fhe :-per
sonari~y structure of defectors dur~ug the' period 196669.' The -wor k primarily involved an analysis of the open literatpreou', known .

. defectors. An ancillary effort'was concerned w:ith' a, 'study of the phenomenon of .def'ect Lorr

its~lf~"i.e., leaving one religion,fo~another,or changi~g one set of political belief~'for

anot.her,'The 'Kork ",'as conducted'at Stanford

Uni.vers'Lt.y ,

I I,:~/ J

,'
"h~"'" Communications Link Loadin

n eT care u y contra e con 1t1ons~ some U. s. microwave communications were recdrded and passed through the intercept system under, test to 'prove , .quality of performance. All intercept:material
, connected with this was destroyed wit,hin a few weeks
of'the,ti~e of intercept and the material was never

'~hecked for ~ubstantive content. \

I--,----_--=------:--~-:-

'~.
:; 00240,
. ~ -~_.._.._. -" '..
,
/

,....t: ;:": . .... .


,'l •• J~:.


. .'
-~:..::.:...;' :.~,\'.,; /':, ::'" ......
,
.C I.·:~·.:) .::yj)i Lt';Ct or {en" Sci.cnceTechnology
,
SUBJECT Survey of ORD for Non-foreignIntelligence ~ctivities
., ,

At 11 a.m. todaY,eich division and staff chief or his representative was ins.tructed ·to query all, of
his people, and report back by this, ~f.ternooll Khetller

orn.o.t· t.hey had provided any services

or

deaLt; wi th

.any',o.ther .ageric i e s on domestic, non-Torei.gn matters.
The..a.t.rached 'list is an inventory o( ..air items we were',able"to uncover. If additional 'information on
a:~y:·''of':th~~e t.opfcs is desired, we,"c·aD. ,.proYide either

a .verbal'-or

a

written report on very ·short.notice.

SClentlI1C AUVISOI '.',·to. Director of Resea'rch

Attachment:
00241.
'& Development
ks: s t a't'ed

I:.,,'

. .'~. ,..
, ,
:,'

.
...

~ .... :•..." ' ~;.:..'

.'.:.'

~;


rJ.vJ'.. " ';D"'1."'1"r: " 'i ..,'.-r
be
"I· . .'-,- ' ...s: oJ')·:Jl,::,
.l.'lOllLt,.,
"j
~,.:
.. , ..
i . (.",
I.~\._.

A
p

r c-pcs cd

{JFH.
·.":;'·eat
e

s t imato r1. 1"~' ~

v
g.','am \0.1) ]' c '1
_ _J

pnlitical1y sEnsitive.
~arcotjcs--our fo~cjgn activities ar~ Kell kno~n

~ .... in Dl;lS&T.


A negativ~ report from the Support Staff.

ORD's

I

Iwor k

l~as

r?P?rted to the-.,·FAA

abou~

.

t.hre e years ago. No act a.on was t aken,:to ~ur know'Ledge ,

~ Performed intelligibility enhancemerrt
----".,o-,f-·-a,-u-d..,..l~·-:-o--:.-.t-::a-:-:p-::e-::s for BNDD. Source of. tapes unknown;

'\

.imagery

.' 1

At .the

r~q~est

of FBI, we described

bhhancement Techniques 'germane to: removing, distortions from some photography,theyhad'on an alleged b~nk robber. Request for spe~ific support in processing the imagery was turned down •

. .

L. I,
II

I
I

.,' .-'"


j ::..:<., ,..., .~. "...?:: .":.



" ;...' .' ": ~.:.; ~~.::. .,,:..
. .

:..:'.. :, .'.


.
~.,-."., . : ','. ~ ','," .
. .;.
."': I
.'

:.~ " .: ',:-' -. ... .. .'.
1," " "; ......•....:

. 'I ~~:~y. 19/3
,:,. '.'
;'lY total contact with other agenci e s 5.n ~C'~Tr.JS of va s s Ls t ance
.'".r;
~ "t .. J... \. .L.~l~ J_~,.;_ .'.,,_:, _. __
.i•.;.h.'~. (.y..••, ,':> 5 t;i.C"·" ..."-,'" »: -1 0 n <:" 1) q '" . 1, ee"1 . ./-._ .;1. . _.h .", -ci ~., 1 df'n di 0 ". i Ir .v t._U

veil1anc~ countermeasures, anti-hij~cking,'or drugs. Speci.fically, I participated Ln TSCC and R&D Sub CQi':i;:Jitt e e meet ings which included technology exchanges and some equipment ex~ changes. on a temporary bas~s ostensibly ior testing or trial'.

:1'

also- a'ssi.sted in x-raying t he voffi ce Halls of the Chairman

~f .the AE.C '.(then I'll'. Schlesinge.r).at ..the. request of Mr. Richard.. ,'. Cowan of AEC security. The op er at i on occurred one evening .(date unkno:m). and 'HaS an attemp.t to resolve. some anoraa.Lies

created byvthe 'use of

th~·1

Other.persons·contacted over·the·years have· been:

:.' .
.. Hr. Robert Burnett, Secret'Service
Mr~:Martin Pera, U. S. Customs·

I.

Mr. Ma-rvin Beasley, DASA
Mr. Thomas Allen, FBI . Major Jack Nelson, OSI!US~F Major John Langager, ONI/USN Mr. 'Richard Cowan, AEC

" ......

00243

.'.~'

;,.:. -:'.'.:.:.\ : ..... .. ·····<.',;J;>;"I~?\;::·>~';·\·~:··~

..
' :. r , :' . .': -"." :.-.: . ,'.';
~. :.,
. '.

....:.:<,: "',,-'.::~.<., ....
5/7/13
.....'.
,': .'
:
... -:..
. .
c:;·~(:jl':'='~1ge of .inf(~'t~r:-i':it:i.ol1.'> •

StateNavy I


I ild.r Po:cce us Secret· Servicei Army NSA DIA.'.

:. ",

FBI 2. Joint 'funding o'f'two ·contracts ''lith State Depart
. .rnent (TR~·l/LLL). Two elec.tret microphones were furnished" to. State Depa.rtment for .test pu.cposes ,.' Joint funding of '.

'.
",
_.
~.._..:.. ..~_.: .",.-:=<: . ',C'_:.~~~- _'" , • '

one contract with NSA' (Sandia).Participation in ~NA/DQD' . "~~~ contract .(Bureau of StanFtards)·..~~''''!

. . -3. Other DOD and Governnlent contacts for information

collection or exchange .on'Ly.• .. ARPA

LEAA/Dept. of Justi~e DNA/DOD
O£fic~ Tetecommunications Policy Office of Army/Provost Marshal General Army/Military,police ·Agency, Ft. Gordon Air For~e/Of£ice.of·the Ins.pec.tor General Air Force/Electronic Systems Division


J".. " '. ':. ~.
","

":"': . :' ..•..'.

,"
.:~:·!cl -i·"r.r::c~~~:; .i"J"!.
.'.

o(lZ45


.:' :t.
'
-.
.......:;.J.~.)~(.." .
..

...J•••• •: ',"
.:..::-, ~.;:

,,

:~.~) c ~}~;L J1go of ·;:-f'C~: n.:L f~ 8.1 :~': ~.~~):. .:.1ati o.i ~rC}... ~1t:l'.::1.g *tf) clctcC-· .ti611 of J:2.dio nucl i drs ;"1 ';,l,,-, 1"7n·'i ...n·~·' ·.nt "

., ~.'~ .'. v •• -',--'_'_'t:_._. _

'f, .,J)Jl-J. C <11 df~,;Cl :',;Si c:ns ~.;: '\ :;i,U, j1 g t () :.lS~':lg ] R sc:'~TlI1j,ng' equ 5.1);:: CJ'it to (.Ieteet . ",:.':l~ ,; ':::,; :'-0;,)7': d fi .c.cs in a sani t<:iry

land fill.

I

~
ENDD
Exchan~e,'6f techri{cal information relatirig'todevelopmen't of I

I

:'~ -. .
USDA &BNDD

CIA has l:equested the establishment of a'tw'o-acre plot of:6p~um,poppiesat a DStiA research site in
Washingto.~ state, to be used' for, tests of pnotor ecogndt Lon of opium poppies •

.f~. :',;:
US COAST GUARD " :;,. ::
- About s'i~,:,'years ago , CIA available~for USCG tests
for night search of life

-ALCOHOL &TOBACCO TAx DIV/IRS


infrared equipment was made to evaluate IR as a means boats.

- About 'five: years ago assi s t ance was r-eques t ed in domestic search of "moonshine" stills using CIA infrared scanners. This ",as turned, dmm'. ' ,

I S ~T

JLVli~' I. O(j"?46


------,..,---
MORl DoclD: l45l843

I /....:<' -v -f'• '.,:
i' . '.."
'" .... : ......::-: ';,''·'.t.. '-'."


" r::;':f-J:U:" Y 'liE i)'i.' •.. ..'. ':. . ': ."..'. . .
..
_..

<~; ~;,
. - *- . .·.0· :": .•__~ "0 ".:_~.. ._ _•
.; T··{ hn~l:aJ.· (.HS;·:::·:·::7·:,:S -..-::,'1.-..;.:;.:-.; 1.0 -.~.~t;.:\::-·;.'·! ..: 11~(.j.:::.;.i:.;lltt:;.:e :.;:L:I·.;:.;:t .;!l~:,,·,.;:;J.:.:~; ::-"'1;1' 1:";,; U.S.'· ":::':-:"'0
~)(j.l ,1\'..:1~
co f'l_"}) e ./\_.;.~C T·, t.. ... ...... , .. • I~..:) c:·~-, "'.'.~~.. :... " . e, _...
,;,omc 0- - ....:-I.,,)).:.l.f.CI1CS 1 .• [;. '';<~''",u.l1,.1l i\.lvl~r

L~boratory, sre supported by CIA to Jevclop radio nucLf do S.::1D,p] Llg ~o:.:d detection 1:':cjmi(i.~'ti-s nrid (}.;\rices. T11E:Se L;;:00T<·11: c::d .c s h:::ve us ed s;3:::p}i:i1g t(;chni.q.i.lcs dc"\-cloped for CTA '::0 :ill:~,;suxe COXUSnuclear plant releases~

----'--__I..


:.'
.'.:.
-:.
.''.
:.:

:-::.: :.


.::. '~.: -.
2
00247
.....
\
/.:
"_.
~.( .

, ......'
~ . ,'. ", ';"'~..~... -, .: v.' .. , :.~. ,"", ,,' . . .'. . .....

1. :SliDD(C::e.:cJ.,"S Cc;;;~d.!1) :'::':.:3 iL-,.'11 ;-"-:2::,dssi.en to l".;c..:eivepr olx)sal s from Aerospace, Inc., concerning a Radar P~op1e Detectordeveloped for ORD. TiI;:Je: Fall of' 1972. Action vas app:wved byDjOPJ). _.
'.,

J

. 3. Dei... ~loped

. .". . Adhesive Restraint, Non.,..lethal II:1capacitation System. Reports and inf'or.mation was made available to Department of' Justice, LEP~in August 1972. If·they de-..:eloped the system, it would be use<;l f'or' .civilian crowd and riot control.

-,

------:-:-::::-

,.",
/
........
:': : . '.',.
'~ "

.-:. .., "

",:,._.

.-:,' ...." ~.. ...

~....-... '1
•••~ ..':.0
:t:J 7]. I ::::-~ :::~·;2..:-:-1~:~:·; f;!.:-.;~.f..;::..'5" ..::~~ ~_:~..-.2; :::~~~:..:
!:;...:t:;~;;.:::Gn::: r;;':.~_~:J :"':i."~-.~_,~:t;::·~·~ "::';~!_l==:d .~~:) ::"'::~~:.":::--~.;?it. :..:t~~

::. .:~ ...:.:..,:}t::. ~".:':~.; J:';,:: ~~;t·:-:;,/ :~.:""~/,.:'~...::j.~.:';J ~.:"~·:::;?:··::;-i_~ "'::::;.:l in. t:?>1.!.i ,.::5..::J;'L].it7 .:;:-c
.:-::.;.";-;'"';;~::::~;i ~.:i·-;:::1::»
.:::i:"£)loy:::c ::.-:::'7:.>;~~ ::-·].:.J.u::::.y ~..n t ..:J~ 7-::c~:':li':::3;1 5-£:;:uri·t.y Ci"t;::t,::3i.an ':ind

;1a4 l:.(~~:i..::r::..~ ,:1:';ia::e ~.f ~~e :3;.1eat:~h prccf'::..;si~~q' =.a-?t?~L.il:t·ty 5.:2." ~~-:~~~~
SJ...:.q ~.:~-.') ..:)r;; tC.tr}.l" t:.!:l):o·u~~ ~1..t:.::;, :t:·;4.:;ncy ::~{~:\;;~.. I :;t~S"";£;:;";~~f~ ·t~;.s::' .~1;~ j)~±~lg 1:::'0 t.~:':':;:~:"3 ~:o ~.::~~.~ l";;}::;f:;;:-,:~{;:.Jry ·:;0 /;~:;,i:;::;:3i:1".o·t:1C £{o;'Z:~;i'::'i:i.i~:j
()i! ';~:l;1a~~~\.::i.~!~?
t:..:-:..\;~ :::;i_~!JjZ::1.G-t c.;c~:-~~.;~.::r..s4;5.-::;_~~:.t"",

! ! .- 'I ~ • t-n.. ...~ ·~...c.pe. :_~ • .: ,..... ..: _ -¥" ~.'~ 't..~'S...........: ... .a J~ - .......... __••k of..-:.. ......,,_ !.~:,jc:::.,~:,.\-o;:-;l ~';2. crJ"'~ ~_::l·..:...".,:...l~Y ~ .1Ut.~;;-:.-'t'::';"': o~ '-c....~ t"~.:-.;:-:..a~· t;__:.~
f .z:.~~orc:3d
th.rongh l~·6al '·Jir.;::tar?i:;g~ . ;r~~ ~:~?e ~;;:"tS 'CO l:? :":5-G-tl
./ i'n ~l"!..:s Ej:::"O~~cut'~c·n e,f ,:=:~:e..()~: ~.i-:.~ ··J·n::;--!.~:...;-'J~ s:::-eu:,:;!:;,1.:"'~ on ox: 2.~10U·C

i .:. :~Gv:;:::.!.:(~r 1971~ j~.C:::':'--:;C7.:'f .~.n;~l:t~~s"'·L':~:.:c,='-::'.30dt:~at~03t of
I

L1.-e t:Ci'\~~.9r3atic!ls G::::~..11·t: bG' .r:r~:aG~ ~o;:.e·~:~;ltc:-lli§i;:'le t~~::;u-:;h t~a
I ~p-rc~s3i;'lg' ~:r;tai.lzibl;3
in t:="2 l~~Qrato-::-.!~.l:l ~i8Vl cf t'j,e -ci~.;:
I ..:~it:icai~3.tur=
of ·t.~e :c;;q.t:.~stl ;J'::::GC~~.s5.l.'ng -;,·rag· ~.:::sg~~ j_~:=::;:31:.;~:~::I: ··Eo~~"\7'ers: .1:~r~· C~'1Sk.iz~3 ~;.q3 i.r-~fc;~-:"~::(l. ~::1;:.t fIlt.:.:..::a IJ:=OC$~35,i~-.,:-; :t1il~r-J.t

! :l::~'ud cO JJ~ ;"tZ£T:.C1."2C. I'~_Oj:--J i,.Jr!~c.lly! .1."1"~. z .: -:.,.;it:h E~?r.Q"t;a'lf~om bej;:;i·=:;:.e-,r l~'i.]e:!..:-; ~:':.it.:1in t.~e J=.ge:nc:1_ Xf .s5_:.:;il.u.r '!:'~qt:a':;i::; ~.,oul':::
otccri~q en a fr~G~e~t uasis I 3u~a~st~d ·t~at t~~PD ~A~c~~~l
~ os: "£11a :i?rQcssr;~n9' .s~lstej;1..
00·249
,,'I"
2... en. 2 Iro"!;o~::ber l~71". l·~t= 9'. G;~5~in.:" .;icpear2.u fJt t!le 8:'.J;1
!
AJ~ ~. "~-7

t')e -t=ai..~a·~1 in ~~ :lsec.c~l~
..-..-" ..,
'

-


!!.."':. .. ". :,' ··t



." .' . . ...
: :'. .:'~ .' . ", ','

S ~JJ3Jj~:':CT:P r oc .;:~:;::;,!r:g of ..:\ud i 0 T ;.{?;~ for DllZ-,::?U. "~f Na r cot.ic
J::\:~:·:b.::ro~'..3 }..J:"*·'.1.Z ~)!~/i~li)n
.'.
.:.
1. On 13 i\pril 1972 .r.h.' CharlesGa~kinsof the Bureau of

1·~2t:rcoti(: ;3 arid... SJ:._ \'t..,,! I:":. n / C'.:{D 2 s s i s tance D~·:.·l~~g~.lO\.lS D r ugs l04~q1,.:'Cste d to, imp::o-~c tl~e inte!ligib!.lity'" of a n Zltldio tape t!~'at had been acqui r e d by BI"IDD 2gC:n~:J..

00250
/.',
::t.'.• :/
...........
<,;: ";':" .....
.' -';" .
"
'." .
f,'--'" ,.
cf

,"I v '

0025:1','
.~.
. ...
'.,:.~
l. '.'
!
. ~. ..... . .

'" ....,
.; ' ', .•..:<:->'.; : ( .,.,::•...:..... ", -,.. :-. -."",
.........---...:...:

" - .:..

f'" '
~ :":£J

l~_S!::.~~:r;'i:;~~.~G t.o ~~:::f.".'~l.l.of :\i. ..~·(:c-t;~c~:

1...: t=i.0 #1."";: i"'e ::.;:.~:c Z"C1.7.::[,E:
1.
)··~.rc R_
):e:-~e;:r.~l Sci.:~nti.fic Cczp,
'(rsc)
~:F.~q'U~:st:eG.
the
cc:ope::a1:.:to:,l·of
S..

lJ.( :~.:r.: t.:·tf;"~

.c::: :::..
·p71.)r.J;;:";:::::_~·:f.; :-::·.:-.~t.-:;r

~i,~~o t..s.pe lie r:cG. rS:::Ct..:.i"'ifed fro;!! tIH?_ Bal-t::t.1'::,:;:C;


l~fr. .John 'Bulla.rd, RegiQn.c.l Di-;e:ctor, h6.G. CO;.~t:ac: t.ed 1-:::-. hcisG to .eid El\DD i.n the i:Zl:.encenent of the, -conver.set Lons on thr:; .tepa ::-e.co!:"cing "hich "rere t"-",_sked b:r backgz-cund'music. The r€s~lt s of thep::-oces6ing ,,"':l.1.1"he": used in e. g:=8t'.d jury inv~stisa.tion an4 2,:"!s"sihle follo,>\'-on -trial. }fr".';.'

:-.. 1.. d· . • not .. ~. ..". t. '., ... 1-' aWG,!:e .c,,(. Jjtll.:.i.~:;:· c.~c.

J...n:J2cate ~·~OYi '·ne !12:U

veco~c
c~

:·..r ..
T'1" •

t·.e~ss1 s expez-tise in t'i:i.5 area ,

"",

rs C)Fi , II fPo" (i 7..\ : • 00252


.........
:
.;"

', .....t":..; ''3
~:
.:
.....
( .:.:"
',


.. ::::::-, :>'..;~l: :":t: (~.~~ !;.:.:.~£~)_ .
.. ~ " .
• •:"•• <
:~~.,

L-__--JJOKD!DDIss'r
...
.J:
'.:...
•:c .

". '0025.3.'


.j $7=r-..••__......

/::j:.:-..:.

'.' . ...•
.'.'"
:'.,
.;:
.. ."',
.'.
.'
.,

if:·····• f


; f
. .
:C'.~.~ ji' I'.'.
.

~':. . :

",;, .' ~ :.,

,"::.
(OP-~J""(~T
.
oJ'

1 t' .DIS J:.:O... ..... '-,' ··'1·"rr
:;!J.,;~; CO:.iC'_:.t"d_:,..[;, ", r O·~.'l";"-1.....·',)'.'),"'), .i':.. J : _e_(:("I)rl ~.d)

a cti.vit.ies \\·11 ~CJl (·c''llld.l)U.t 1':1e J.~gl~rlCY·in.to a n
erribar r a s sing s ituatiorr,

1•. There'are no rrris sions wh ich we have flown. during the last four years with.which.I:Can associate the result di rectlyto any activity' .' . poterrtially ernba-rra s sIng to the Agency. There were a number.of rrris sions flown thatindirectly:hav~the potential for this. ernba.rr a s srnent,' .' Bear.in mind th at, once we tur-n the fiII11 over to NPIC or any othcr- agency, we'

have no ·con:tr~l ov:er.subsequent distribution. .
'. . ...:','~':~ ~ :.'.

2. The .rr:d.~~{o:~.slisted on the'attaclnnent are in three ~ategories:.
. ..;'...:~: .;.

~~'-"¢~'t:egory A: These Cire rrii s sion s flown in the U.S~. that' aF.e ve:ry -sirnf.la r to the potentia.Ltlaat you discussed with me usmgthe example of the Santa Ba rbar a oil disaster.

,... . ...... -:.~

. ,';,..b<.::::<:;:~.t~~<:lr;·. B/ TheI~detection of'illicit..


.popPY'gr~~;}'i-s.a-separate c"a..t""c"-;·g=o"'r=y=-b=-e=c=a"'='u""s=e~of theh~gh sensitivity
of Q.lis supJect.:."
. ',,~" •::./ '0:-:,.:. - ',
c. 'Cc:t~g6ry C;
cnowledge not mg sensitive was pre ce
this :activitycould be labeled illegal..... "': ... :'..'" .
3. Lhave-spectfically looked to see where our U'~2'·s.were
operating du.r,ing the Watergate break-in discovery.. Democratic National

, ;pgp Sli:cpET
:'i'

,.., .
t' '"' ..... ~ ••:>'
. , . :.~ ....' t. ~ '.. •..

" ~'
. ',"':.

(~OJ1\ .. C.lt·r(:;n 3.?;(1 Rer' ~1)Jj';,"n l\.r;:.t!I·IU~J. C...···.1\ r:· ~i~J~,n .. 1"'s.!1 th.c·al)t)\.·t~ ~:",·,.:nts
occu r rcd i'n the l:-:i:l.::t: ;:ll"~r1 on r ::.j.l·f.~r:·:.ft f.~·! ~"']cj'r :'}!i~;slon's di ...trJ:~g :J!i:j time ~.fJ;l'5.t"(.1 \'::-i$~.u the ";:1·\·~~.~{,.lorn l:-:",... j·t I,ll fhe I} .. S.

Brif,::.-:1iel- G'eneJ:al, USAF
Director of Special .l\ctivities
.Attachrn.ent - 1
As noted above

',' ,.;', .
" . ..

TOP 6EOftEYI~I

....

00255

l:'~'


TOP~~CRB:f
·.r ~ "

"
, , '7'ASK
POS'SIB'LE'IMPLICA;'i':~ON"'e
"." ;. .-CATEGORY A

Santa Barbara Oil Disaster Dept. or'Interior.; Fe'1;>' 1969.

Potential for pr-ovi.ding ba.sis iOl' criminal law surts,Pj.;e~suse 01. oil company to change oper a..tior..

HILLTOP (. : \..' )

ORD/NASA Eal~th Resources Programs.', Spring/Fall 1969

Snow Survey (Ii ;, '.'i

Hurricane,Base Line Environmental Science Services Admfni.str-at.ion (ESSA), Dep~. of Commerce thru COMlREX. Spring 1969.

bince

b"! Econom:ic'Pre,pC\.red

ness. Spring 1970. .'

PQli~icalleve;L'age '£01' di.sasteaa r oa funds '.

Earthqtlake Darnage
r.!.' 'J Ii '-', '._ l • ~
,Mi~neapo1is

o ;', .Kansas 'Gity
o
N

'Self generated, NPIC processed.
Feb 1'971.

OSI/.A:EC Division. Jan - Mar 1972.

'(::'l·il~!~li:"i~il
~~<.:C-:'l~.S;;:..·l~ctiv......

..-:' o
..
8;;
:;d
-;.~ H
::

Political Lcvc.cago, neglig.ence suits. cxpl.oi.tafion,

tj o

....... oEn.viJ:o'nmcntal apllli.ci.I,t.i,.)i::.s,H
tj
uzban planning; expl.oit., l,~0i'1.

~TOP SlrCRiiT

, Pos sible1.1:';(; £01' i;.-.d-.:..::;t:;:ic=..L exploitauion. Crop' P:::OL~..~ct,~or. control & estirn...a.tesi"'""·~\.t:~...c'rr··Id.:i.·,itCl:. j'

I Induet.riaf ex:?::'oita"i:ion,.'WC:L"~Cl' r e scur-ce a.Il.ocation,

,.
:;
I--'
~
In
....I--'

I'

.ill
~

[iii:W
'~~

yOP snORE'%'
".

',,' ~ ~ \',

TASK " BY WHOM/WHEN
. .

POSSIBi..E Ii:VIPL:::Cl\.TIO:'\ CATEGORY A (9 0 n tinued) "RIVERBOAT(~\~""""jll" ~q NRO -.·IeRs. April 1973.

'> . 1 ~ '..

i

West Virginia Dam Site Coverage

CATEGORY B
NRO Army Corps of
Engineers. Jan/reb 1973.

Pot~l1tial fo:: :;:cal·c::,J;.:;.ti:: exploitation., watcr cent:..'ol.·. 'j -.r ;

I I

(Puerto. Rico), Multi Spectral Sensor BNDD, DDI/CIA, NPIC, ORb. Dept. 9~ ;Agriculture. Fall 1972.
erA extension of clOi)'~ t.i·::,...~·t~cldnb
fl'om SEA to CON1:,s. 3d;t<::::t' 'techniques to avord clot.:::ction or growth. CATEGORY.C

.LONG SHAFT

I

NSA/CIA COMINI' collection.

I

c

o

N
CJl

'];'0'2 S];CHTi'=C.-J
I
Political leverage. Lclu<';l;l"i<.;.l
exploitation, civil d:a-r...-iCi;;O suits.
, ';'..~.
.; .,".
~
o
::u
H
tJ
:.
'.

o
~ o
H
tJ
f-l
fl:>.

r::····:>.

In f-l

;'.

. co

fl:>. W

......

:"...' -.

:. .:'., . .; . '.:.. ..·,'. ":' ~~ ..:...,.>-...".:
-, ~: .

(-C~jltr~.c.:t,;·-;d. :311 i n ,)ffic'c' .wi t h e.:\1:Cllt.l:)11 "i-E r:',Ul"(!~1 "fDY-
1
e So U1t s ~: t?Sd t 'i_"",' C

L-_~--I contacted all but t wo who were on leave-·-n,:;gative.


Parangosky negative on those he could contact. FolloKing ar~people he could not reach:
said FMSAC:has negative resul~s.
00258
• '110 .:,.: '.:':

..• _..

... ..

. ..~ .' ~~

,.'

'''':,-: '. '.' i:'. .: ,"Ot C 13 0535' '.. ,:··r~'/i
..
...
:"~' :'<. •~••' " :'. .: .1. - .... '. "" :•••• :'';'.:. :' .::~:{~\'~~'iL~r
.;.••• '"<" . .. ,
~ :. ..' :
.' ......
.::.;

.' \. ,....':' "." . ..'.' .:..
:., :
• •,. •• -'to _' ••:.... • .' ~' ..••~••.,::' ;

......

.:
..
.,.......... .'. ".::'.:'" '.,
'~.' .::.: ..'

:i.;::::,~~:~UMFOR:-.:::::~?;~:~;:~:~:l~~r::::1:beL:,:./,g~~1

" .i·io'l;~sC Arme:d.Se.i.v.l'ces .Con>.mittee,. Conce-:rning' .~?;:./.<;:;. ".}. '.'..., ·'-:.:'·:e·;· .... .... ",1


...
.,
.. ,....,....
.~. '.:.:...
----,..,-------....,...,..,~=--=~

. ..,': ':.. . '.'-;.,

.>,; :.,:;. -;
~.' -"
t-o··i-Iebe·J....t',~ l .. ~~·t..:··r·~is ~l')i:acted
. ... t: :-.-.::::~';...-~.~~~"~. .. ··f~i. ;t\~;;.·t.)-~olut~ry no res·po·~T~'~..
." - ,.•~,~ . - . ...~..' C'~ ..,.':j(f;!:~~~"

.. ,. .;::~';'
. . .....;.' .
·.i\.i:t::.... . :'," .
. ...... : .." .
'".' '.':
':.' -, :r: :. .' . '..

".;'

.".:' .: NOTE:" .Thi~'~mo 'dt~ ~.' June' ;3:tn)Lc'::73-0635).(pgs:;;.~·~9· thru .265) was""


...._ sent. to the IG for hi 5 i nformattgn",and was 'not·.~onsid~re<I: a part of the.'
. DDSg.r components," slibmissions··:to')'[,the :lGin response to the. Director's'"
requ~st on "Questi.onable Activi·:e,'e~',r:and, therefore,'it is beli.eved .

\.
/
.tha-t""these documents should not lle'::included in the Halperin request•.,

.,,": ." .... . . '." ... : 0··.. ..'..

;,- ": .... ;:·OOZS5i:.·
.:"'
\
; ". ''''-..''
..
-
.
......
~.-. "~
.-...
..
-:.
.,
._
.......
'_.,

\
......
-
.
......~_....
--.....-
.
MORI'DocID: 1451843
..~ .,,'
.....
'.. "OLe- 13-0935·.. · ..
.
,': .
'., ~.,. '" .
.....
'.' :. ". ..~ .'}: . :,' .......
~.:.:' . .
. ~.:. ';.' ." ."e.• ....,.. ;..'. :~ '",
.:'
.
-, . :."":" .
. . ....
·.l\..~t::,,' .
.." .. ;.>
.' ....
'.,:
~ " .'.";.'

.'''. ,: NOTE:" Thi~ .memo 'dt~ ~ June ;3·_:(O·i.C'::73~~635f·(pgs:~~59 'thru .265) ~as:.· .


:...._gnt to ..the IG for his informatiQn:.,and was not.canstdeeed a part of the.' . DDS&T components' sObmissions·-:'l:o:~th:e -IG in response .to the Director·s ...
requ~st on IIQuestionable Acti"itj't!s·...·and, therefore, it is beli.eved. . .thp-trthese documents should n~~ J:)e<iric;:ludedin tQe Ralperin request•

. '~',.- " ...'"•..

. ::::. . .
.::....


..: '~..'
•••. .. \
.. '.. .
•••• _ •• ' 'N, .............-.....:_ •• lJ>....._•••_ ... __•••• _.__ ••__,
........~" ;i..:t".'1:...,••~".,_>(~. . .".' ~.;",·1'7r:.DlIVARbH....a...R ••CHA!~.dAN" .••.. ":._ •. ,.: • ;.TN"l!J<7lot~S-""""1:'"N:lc.:' :.: .
'.. :. ':..: ';:...~..:~::.~:' :'.: .. ,
•• ".4

." . .'!

':~;

....
:. :
.

/:[.?~ ,·~!\,,~

:,:

~·.;~.:i:::,,

;,··.

~-~.::,:.:,~, /.' .-;~..:.'


~
-::.;-':': ;..: ,.. ..:.:...:.:......:~. .
~ ......

...
~
- .: '.' :-,~~~:.~.:. ," .-7:-..' :/
. ", ','...

. ~ .-;'.. Cen.l.ral.··TntOUJ.genr-.,. Ar.onMr :.'< ..•••,c. " , ':~""",~,.•~.- '~.. <'<"''''.,.

"":-;-;i:;'':'i<:;~~tlt:~1;~i~E~ft{€'~~~{~i~~~,


."i';';f:<T-~~~ ;"·;;';"'~~::i,;.i.G~;~ ..tib''''~' ';l>.at:e"e:..-';,e&;;.~~:f;!:\,,";,*;,;.'i

~::.':....-'.::-;. .-:. :, ..,.,~."t:, -.


':: . 't .. "

..•. ".:'.,.:.:

",".:.:;~'... .- .:.. ::".:';:';";::::.'.. • ••~ ••1
. --'
.
-.. ..'~ ..~.: ~.: :':·~':..l..·.~: ~'...':::" ":.: .·..F.Eif:'t·:hb··..

. ., f:' •
...</font>':_'..~ .",
.;
.....


..... '. "••: ·,"r ..
:.:: ...,.... ..

:.
'::' . :
-:~ ......~-" ,.'
r, ',_:' .':.~ .:.
•.:......:•••• ':••t.-.
• >:

.. • -t -:'--.
.t .;\~..
al • .,.'

-r. :. .... .'..:

"." .,. '.;; ~ .

.

:,';' '", ~:.,: /.

. ·"t; ,.:::.,".;
~.'" . '.. :....:..:.~. '.
, "
'..

.~ '.
"., .;'"
. .'.~ ::. ~. .. '. ..', .
. ......

. ..."" ;. .'

..... -:...,.....":'"".\ .""

:.:

,:: .

.. ~'.
'.,
'.
.
.::....~.'

-. ";
"."
... r


. '. -',
:<

" " ":-.;
MORl DoclD: l45l843
.: .. -: •• t

00263

, \.


,....
::'" ~!;~i
.;':::: i':!' :"';:..
':::'" ;," :<:}:;.
"

" "..~. "

.'

"
.
.
.
. ) .'.''.
.~ ; " ... .

,', 00264


......'.
"0 ,t"0

\
MORl DocID: 1451843
.
.----------'-------------,,--~--~~~"'---""-'-----'-----'-'----"-~'--------'-----'-~-~I.~:'f
~/f-:'

'00265
....-.
~'. :.". ..~.,
\

, .:: .
.:"
: .>... ' .:.' ,. : ...... ,.,'

,:.'' ". .' .'.' ':
"
.. :
. . .:::"

:'lE·10R..,;~·m\JM FOR: Deputy Director for S,:ic11'ce an.d
Techn.?l()gy..
:
,.'.
SUBJECT:

Policy Rega~·d.ing AssLs t ance to i\gencies "
Outside" the Ent eLli gence" Community onSpe9ch Processing .Proble~s

~.: ':'.
.....:.. :;,::: : .
1. Recent putilic':f'6:~;~~rn over ",Age.ncy .af£i~iatio:ns .:.....
with law enf~rcement activities has made me warf of offeririg..
-'

,::" '. sp.eech proces sLng as s.Is.tance.to various other governaent.. :...... .agencies. :My concern herevis restricted to government acti vities .cut s Lde the' 'int:elligence' communit.yio· .Because

. of a'.scientific communi-ty .awareness vof the'expertise. of . .memb.ers of..O:pL in speech -p'r'oces s Lng .p r.ob Lems , we are .often .asked by individuals in .gover'nment for help o.n various .speech·problems. The.requests are 'usually informal on a

person-to'-person basis. lvhile most' iof these contacts.
:-r' ':..

involve only'an exchange. of 'uncl assLfded Lnformat.Lon,',.:" .severa.l, 'have ~nvolved.th(t.use.,of laboratory resour-ces,

, 2. cO'~~acts hav~·::,:~'~:he':£~om t~e FBi, A~to;~~y ...'.' .


.. ' ,:'... General's office,. Bureau.iof .Nar-cot Lcs 'and Dangerous.". ~.

prugs (BNDD), Post O£fic~".:'a.nd ·the .Treasury Department •

. Of the above , assistance'·.toBNDD had been. spec i fdcaj.Ly san.ctioned by Mr. Helms. In one recent instance wher-e a"noisy tape was· to be used ,..in a cour-t case, care was t aken.:'

t o i.nsurethat -t.he vprocessLng of the t.ape was idone. entirely''.' by. a BNDD .employee:even·:t:hough it was done' in an Agency,", ,'. . laboratory. 'usin.g the.:·Ag:en.~y's .Coherent Spectrum Shaper ... equipment.' ." .

-". '.'
. .......~: .
.
.. '.....:
,~'.. '..
. s:.•-,

" -,". ;..
, I GU.i:H~ltTIf\ll . L
. ';"'~''.'
...i
..
l~---"---------'c------_.....J
. .. , .

00266

\
:

I.

I

~~~;:~::( :;. ..... <: '.

..:.'
"
......

...... : .... . "'.;. .~. : ... ", ~:
OEL-OJ.Q-73
r. .. gc 2
"? ') • " • • f ~l' l'J • . .

.s , 1}·OV.i.('J.ng S(;YVJ.i:.:::S 0: r n i s ;\1.;i(~ to ()tn'er';:'~::'e:nc:Tii;~ has not(IS Y0t .irq:;o$f;d· a

there is a benefit to us in t ha t

the staff' to test tec;hFliqilGS an d

si~)!if5.c(~i1t i';orkl'~&d on..~saii~."':':"_:
such ccnt act erHioles .:

t::'-t1.1ipr,wnt en avariet.y' ... ~ of speech pr-oblC'::ns.JnInFt.)l'j;l:Jl '.ntc;-;::cU.cms at the tcch!Hc.i!l'
l eveI':1.7 [1'1"1";-:)"ll] ~L-("l';;'Sof

.. _,
.

,~~
.'.
Hence we ~ouldsupport other departments on

\_. "'--'•... ., -;'I(,1r';"'~J '\'5" t o ;'('C('~"'"'-T-'i<,;:'ll' ~gcncy goals. be ~il1ing to continue.to .,an ad hoc basis ~ .but ',-"oul,d":' .

appreciate your guidance re the wisdom of OEL's involvementin ltdCl:lestic" activities. .' .,.....'

.'0OnN IV. MCMAHON . ...::Director of ELINT DD/S&T

:.-'; .
. i

'.. \ ..
I.
I'.
MORl DocID: l45l843
·i \.

: _._ f&~. kj:,?1AI£j:Ze'7""~' {.~ e .e.._._-_ ~.~.~e-.-:~-. _~_.~--_._.,';:~..-._._ .

;" f,

..-_ f1J;jj{i

_,<ud

On

·
...cJ1"f:.:
rlC--tt,t1
:£'f'I.1,? 6.I /-iI'V?f:'·A'4::..
I S-e~t-:CI~<-( -Jo'

~::~~:.t'~·.'j.~,;.<.: "'. ~. -'. . .: -,t' .v •~ •

47-"AY tc-o~j?f_~ .., ......fO..l.JUrl~'7-::'· ,,1'2
.
I

......~..-'" ::~ ~:
. '" " ..,; ;..,.,- .: -,. "

" .
. '. ..'.

.~.-_..-..-~ _.-::'...':..:...~.."'...
.~._._..---_._~...,.,._,.' ..-
.~..:....- .. ',...~ i;·'~..:······.-.'..."...

.~_...:..-_..--_...------
Co,'
..-""'~"~~"-' -.-., .,'..-: ..,._.-~_....:. .. :._.
. _
. '.' ....
-.._.......':': ._.
_...__...:'.-.~.."-"'" ..:... ~.

. ./" ..

... _•••••••_. _ ••• 0":' ''''._:.'' ',_.:__.._._._.;_.•_ .• _ •• _ ",...

__._-_.._ .'.. ~ .... ,~ .~..

--~_.._-_.__._---.-------~.-..._....... _.._._.:.-..__--_.


.__.- ._..-"'---.';" ...:..~..._.....:.::..:.-'...
-' .
••• ••••• -r.••• '-,,':.';"'. '0', ·':.-----:7 -:-.:...._.....-:-.... "',';-.'._...'~.:., ." '." .
."--------_..-.--------_._-
--'-"~' ..,,:....--,.. ..--._---,......._..._.~.. --.,
.: ~>' ~'.;.
....'.:

r '.~;'
.,.<.: .
:Jt " .,..
:.' ;:'
.:~~ .-:.'. ~-.:' ::-..l!.
-.

.,~.
,.' . '" ..'
".~
..':.. '.: .,<. ';'.: ..
...... :'~

.>:...\,I" f.~:'Ag~inst whom '40 theseag~.nt~·;b~~; '.cin,.wh~t:··C1~··thei·.....~ report.1 . arid' ~o whom? . '..'::.


, IGe.t copies. of' the repcrtis 'on "Restless Youth'.' :aIia. black radicalism. .....~:-..

I~, How. is the cryogenic magnetometer used, on whom, and f'or'what

~. <c.. '. purpose?

..,"2-:;'Get copies of the reports on ros, ..--

lr Why does DCS:collect information onI 1..:.---I IWhat is done with it? -----,----------
'~Y is DCS. gettingI l.f.O~.~~.Om.1 and for.·what c-:.' '.purpose? . . Iv""..,
_.(:de~·a·~cio~'onl .'::


:;~~"'G~~e me a c.6uple of paragraphs on TOfte •.~.

..3

Inc~ude the: submiSsion of FRDivision.~. '.

c....

..:-~. Get ~he ful~.:story on providing a~ias dOcu.m~~tationto 'the 'Secret 1..--.....

'/. servi.ce ,'.. ' . .

... "WhY did :we'pay.the costs of" the respon~es:·.toletters receivedt~.' I~r-.l:!-bout the PresJ.de:o,tls .speech on CambodJ.a1

:.:'.';:{i{~tipPiying ~e~c~~s 'to Ambassadors seems ~i~;~.:~·.gOOd idea. Eowmany --


.'.'~ are' ..there in use'and where?
', ~ '. ; ~i -',

'.. ,':~y.'is''Logistics procuring~police-type-_equi.J;Jinen.t·f'or local .police v·· , -forces? '

.·.I!rWhat is'.a.telepho~e.analyzer?' ,,/
:~.,. '---1~-":::"'-"':'_---'-
·j;~:t./,f.hY is it necessary Ii! 'to continueL.._~_

:":;4''~ore on Vesco. How did it get started? . What.·was done? Why was ,..-


. :.:it. stoppe~'l..... v- ,':
.'
:.;.::.2 What were the .mUltiple channeis to CIA .on:.the ..IOS matter?~
.... ....

»:...:

.:
......~. . .~
.. ;., ....

00269


, ',~'. ~. .:.' .;;:":" '.,;
'~';:;'t::~~;:;-''::' .
~ '!..

.: ..:.(~j) ::.~~-~:., ,' ., .._... ... "" .._. . ~"~' ...


..---"---.~~lf1?-: :::.£..~.0c~~'::i.~~ L.bo;J-"..•~ .._.._~, :__~..


.... ... ..... . ~cf-(>r-erf ~......,-y,'"e@)~·. .... • . .
........._. _._ .._.:_~.........Br;;;.~(!.~ n~.s -Ill}' A-/11k.·~i r.~r"·d.d-Y--S· LL__


ips" ...;....

.. ~S-N()(b~:S
........_.~.:........ ," .... . ..tJ. o..-.C!..g'-"~' .~,;;., 'fjl~.J,p·e, ~~?-

.

. .
. ... . I~S '-1/lv-...i~1(...... ..j-..~I't:#l.-~....,...,~4'!A.,L.CL'/(.~~7' ,,--
J).lJ.. I I!.,


- ..'~.... .,... ... .

d-~n.-f ..".<.<~ 1 ----'-_'.'-D.~ R:.' c::;;:;. ._.~.... _.~ ~..:.-:._-_.


._
..
__
...

_~. .-....-.. V ~ s N ~ ._ ••_. • ......~_ •• • ~_. ._


C!'0, I-f.~
.
_.

..


..~_. ", .... '" .
~/t
~\ .../
! ._.....
,.

.

-.'. :...'" ... I/t,j!L.r;;f LV·c-/"(} A<\.~<-:.({ .~/e.; (I-·tt~f~~·'~··l1 e..f~


':-.' '.' /-.Q:. u5~ c./ ~ ,:.t6'fll#-; ~; G."!,:r··':. ~ ....:'. . . ..
I.-~"-'.'._ - ...... :..:..-.:.~. "~-~ ~., _.i '. ~I ; (!-:......r-' (, " '. 'c::> 'f!' l"VI. tl h .....


"
.............

::; _'. -_.'-_'-" ...-._......._._..:-.. ----.._----_.--- ------_....._~----~-------_. __._-,..._---,.


..;S:.: ~. . .. . ...~...._ __._.
.}'.
.. ~.,. ..: .... -". ..
_..

-
J_"":'" '" :.

~
.,

; [: >""'''......-- ..

.....-- ...L~·


f ..

._ ~f.": .
i~_·_"'~ ,_i.
~... ~_ -.~.
- - • '" •••••• _ ~., ••_".~ -'-"-~' •••. "--~" M ~.
'_'M_~•• " ••_ .:_. __,_"__,,._,

.
-- ..... , -"_' '"_'M,••• ~"~"••••""._.~. ..
/

:":l~;':\'-'..- ..; ....-._...--_.....:._.- ""........:._-..
,
. : :: ·.--: · ,·,:

fl$~


~. ' •....•

,I ~...r-".",...,
", ...-' .....~


.-...-......-..~...__..._.. -'-"-"-'.~. ...._----:i:'
----~ "...._",;,-.~:_..·_..C_~;'\': •.
~::
.
"."
._-------._---.--_...._._._._.__..-
: ';.. ',,~.
'","~ ' .
'--"-~- .,------_.~...~-'--'-;----.--.--'

.f:" :~',., ......;..,--.... ~ -- ."

,
. ~
:-:.

. ,
- .--:-.~.._..:......_.....-..._.....-

.._ _. -._-_..'-:-'~'''''-' . ...-....._-.._._----_.....- -----_.._.__

._-~.;-._:. _._._._._~ ~._.:,,-:,. '.",-,
..
, (':"

-,"
..
":-,"-':' ..
~;. t
'~.
. ..
1
.-- -- -----_.
---_._._._-=-'-..:.:,"'.:,-~~--~_
.._--_.-----..._-----_.._---

.... " -... ,-~...:2-.....,.':;:7:"--:-:-'

v l:.'~·:: .: . :.,~
.:;
-. ~.'

I


rI . ".' ... ~ ,', ,..".. •-0..
!
..
:.,

,------_....._---.----------------------_.._---:-.-...----.---------------_._--...,-----....,.

~ _.~.'" "." _.~ .._..~ -_ ~ --- :.


~
~. ..:

, .,

l...... - ...._.:....". ~....._'.. _....{
_. _ ". - '--:;,r.' ""

.. ,.r -v 00272


'._.".'- ........... -{

..._.._-.~.._... ~....:.--:--:~ ...:...:....._~.__...
."-,

------------·---------c-------.-:-.-:::-----'.----~--~-_.-- ..----~....---.. -',__~ . ....:_
J' .'" ;.,
------_' - . _.' ;. .. .:..
MORl DocID: 1451843
'.
,:',.1· '.:: ,···,.:,·;~~'t.(~::t':.: .. ·."".l;
....:
,. '.~.-_.'.<2.'''''
.'1 _.
....:..,.
--.-------
-.----.--'''--''''''
.
--'-;'-:~·=-."""+-t~':_'_'__:"_··-"_·-

o.s ((

".~.
e.-~ ..~.e-.::

da-u-~ {]~~~~~-ed


..__. - -.,..~.._..-. . .--------_..._._--- --.__._-"'"''''''---'''_._ _._ _ .._....,._.,.,..C',_+_.:-:__.;__.-.._ __ .


-'..:.. _~ .

--------..,,------.---_...._----.__._..-. _ :---------'--.


.
'.i 1:

...
_.
.1:, -;::
-~.' '-
-, ,~'

__.--------:-.


...~'
:.-.

__
i
._-\

••_. 4 •• _,. .....__ ..._... _ •• __ .........

i ..:-----:--:,j

---....--....----.------..---.--.---.- ...~.:::·~'h0273·


. .
-.....
-:.._",';,-, .~.. ,
. . .',.' ~
••..'; . '. r".

.__._.._._.._k .r:...


I.: :' '.
.f

I .

: ..~ :.~.. 1;:.· .. , .
• • _. ;~ ••,_",L~-: ._•• • _ • •• "

H'//

.
:..

.;;,;;...* t.--- ... t.O .. _/DoL. .a./-:. _ ..-......:~'!.'.. e.-Cf '" ~oJ "-'" '"
'---'---,~~-_~:~-~-f-'-~~~:J::c-:~ -;;-i~~~':.~~~--,
J:h I 1;'V",-~.J1Vtlv,~}4'e'i-+/~cz.-r;.

':> ." •
...- . ... ."~ .... -..

F.¥41.:-r:q~~.··/)~~_...·.


, ..;\:......
• Op • ":.". .M' :" •••_.;. ": _,•••
" .."
-:-
:. .~

\... :

.. .. .I. -": .- t{),~ Q-tr C t- PJ.·:.:··r-.:6lpS,.5.. ..i .. . . .. .'


'-.';" .....::......... .
:
~".;'

--i-f -rJ,-U"''ffo.t/~ / """'y7~ '";,;,rn"'" I;, I/:Vt~t f1.,. .:(;:> ..Q·~.ti_,-~---c-k:~--;~~~J---:-~=-:;..----'ll


U -, . ...' ..... :00274
>1

L~~I" I-~

.
_. .••_ ...__•• __•__ ••.•. ~._ '_0- _..• ••••~ •• 0 •• __ • • ••••_. ••
.: rr
·,···..,.;0.'''···.., •...
.
.
.....- -.,_,:..
,~ ...-, .... '

..; ,,':,,~_ ..~ __.... _ _., .

~_. _~_._ ..__ ..~ _..~.._'":":::.:.~::~c::-~ _..:.,' -;--_.__ _,._ ,. . _ '. ":'l>::t"

.... -.-....- .....

.:.:." ~_._..-:.:;~'"'I'-..,, .. -"::"_., - "." ~.....,_...,..~.

.•_'::••~ .•v'•. ........' ..

.......-_-.-...::'..:'-.,;
-------.-- -...---------:-----""7'"-.- ...
._ -:-.~.
....
•. ·P...._....0- ...._..... _

'. ~~
-',' " _,'- c;.-. . --...... .

-..-..
------_._...
.._; _.:
I'"
. ;
._-~.._~_.'._--..-_..".-.--._--..:.- ..... ;"'.....:77:...:,._:...._-:'"....

t _._-_..-'~-".'~--~.~ , - ,~" "" .~ :..',.. " '!'~,\~:.::;,~. :~


;~ ~ ,.. :.. . _..., }t~:" ..,..._----:--"(:7"~?;

...._"..-. :.. ':!{".;.::.~
.. .
.
,
"..-.:..-...
-

·~~. __T;~i--;': 71:;_.UJ~~~~':';~ -c<!'?~ c-~.... •...


("\1\. ... ./::,;.:..~Il U~~(tG" .(i)~:.~ .r: ~"Q./'~)\"-'"
. i'J'~~Q tvpu9'f-:> Id(.~, '. .. . '.' ..


./ ~..., . _..... :...-: .-. .,

.~ -: -:" . " ..
..., .
.
- .... ;..;.~.....:. ..
':".

._--------,--_.....-_. ..__........_-_. ....._--_...--------_.-.... ---~---_ ...-_.-.-.--""'''--''_......_ --'-"-'-'---'---'"


" :

.. "":." ...... - •••••••• :. •• _ c , :••••:-..•••••• :""


.._.-~.._..:.. ~...

.. .1'".•:-...::-.:.,-.. .. ~'..'.._----.~

---~-------------

MORl DoclD: 1451843

..._... __._-------'-


. -.:'.
."
'..
;.:
.'.'.

.
.'~.'.:
-.::, ...
....: ',.~
.
;
. '. ..
_.: -"',~ _ ~.. : ~ "'': " .
• : • ".1".'• .; •• "._ ••__'.~._.~.... _ .,·u. _ ' .•__.._ ._
•.~ - -t~ .--'.. ." .• _ '" ..•~.. .. <.
0 OM • •• •• ••
-. ,••• "':." _. 0' ..... _ ~., _ ".' __,"_'••__•••.'•••••'_'" _•• _~ ._.......~•• _ ." ••••• _ ....'

.........._ :-.$'.~. -"'-..~ ~""_ ..__.. . - ..- -'.. .._.
• -'1" • .,., ~ '~"- -~ ._.-..

'; -~_..(~~".~';~=:'___ -. --_ _._ :...._. --_._.."'-' ._.~--~._._....~- .._'----... -.- -."" ..... ~_...0. ..


# .',
..
>. "'.
.'
..
-
.
'.
-. -_:_'---'-:---.- ...... __..- -_......- ...._, ...._ ----------: '-'-'---'-"'-......:..--00277-.._-_._-.....-.._~.
i . . ,.t.:: .~-----~--._.. ..__..
I
_.~-::---~.
__.--:--~..- "'.--'
.............. F
<

:..:....-._-:-.---:-•.... _,..--:;.._~ ~. _.__..... .._..... ~.
,.•..: .' . " . .I • . ....
.
,......
MORl DoclD: 1451S43

. _._--._..~. ,-"._~._.__.__..;_. - -------. ""
. .
.._------.__ _ ,. _.. .
···.".·__._..,._h , __ .."__.._.. -. -;..... ~""" ... - -. -. ... ..
· . ..'. ;....... .. .
~";., -. . ,"' ,.
...............,
.-." _. . .
.
•: •• : ->,
. _.' -_..' -~:-'._',.,.:..,..:_,," '-'-"~" _. . .- ..-

.·_.'._.:. _.._- .'----_.- -"- ..-._ _-_ --_._-----:. --._ --.•_~._ _"..--.'.--._._


. --.._---_ _-_-------
.'

·::l--..


.: ". ;.t

• OJ.. "

- .


~.,...: .:..:~:~_~. ".-_..- ._, -, -"-' .._ .-~. - ••- •• R_ ••••••• __•••• _ ••~~,,_'. R._.. R"_' • ••• _ . .... ...•. .... ... . ..._.

~:L :: ...


;~.••i , ~••
.:}- "."
.v! .'.:'..,r",.....~i
,!:--"~,.,.l. ,"" . ... .. .. "_". _ :- .. ...:: : . ._ .. "

;I ':'..., , . . "' __ .. __ ,.. :..' '00278.:1--- -.. . "'._--.- .._-._----_._ --_._..~._ --"-- --_._ :.. . :... . d',,·:·:·' ~_.._. " _ _..~~" . . rr-


• J'_
:":.:
:.;

,n'.,'L.t<__,'e:--~"'-:~,;
. :'~
·_-...._......~-,~;."":--r•..,----_•.•,.•

(J).,'~/¥,.'$.~-e;:i-~;" 'Cl~~-?- '~6c/,.-',&;/./".
~'6-.; »sr:

~~

4~'

:';~-.£'e

k~: ",

:i .."..;'•. _•...
- .'~': .
..
- ..:,...'"~. ",..:.-.~.." :..-•..,......--...
:~:'., !
.c '::'
.:'--.-----------'--.-'-'------------'~------'--.--~----:,-------,--
-,'.;,:_~/".:';,.' -.:..-._ _-,,. .." :..'~ -:... -",

J;:~ .. ',;:1" .'J./ /'

::-:)
..
'
...
:"
-,.~-_.
---------
'-'-.---._,-

, :,-----, ...:-.__._"--:-:--.-._--::------.---. _. --------'...~_-:-------,:.c.__;..l:;~c-c=-,; .~---'-_


t··..:·":·_;-·-....~ ·--:-~·:-··-:':.7·~··--:~··,·.':"·,· ,.
.
, .._----~--.~--.----,,- ---.-------

.... , '. . ,....:.. -",

.... ' .

,_.~
'._..• _..._ ..~

'n'" ~ :::Afl··a;u·~.-:·


l'~X ..·"~-~;;}'\k~~,.


.~"". il1.-~, k 1'7~,~/..~". q.#'F'. d C-IjJ;iJ~~ ,;....
.---''' :: __ .: ...~~.-I!.~~ .. P.,·f~~r ;;£tlj4i~·;;_.. _..~__.

--"'--e:::z:a...,:i-:-::f.~'~:'.'~~..',""''''''~':",
ULJ

~.
:,1 '~VY( 14..-~.f(.-.'i

·.,1·· ·.., ,..: ~.,


, ·1 "\/",. .

. ..-:·;··t·~·;-~·····-.·~-~--"':f....:....._._t;:5_;~ ;~.-.~.


•• t

;C.~~:~;; ::,(;...e: '.. t.u.,;tl

~'#'~' ..'


.-.' .~J.4"~~ .'.. '()-::~ C> (;).i1l9~1(/l vs '71..._ ----.-.---....~.,-:..-."_;.,Jr:.:.-~~£t:l II~~<>::.r-.zL-etd: 4-+~/l:l_~.5!LQ ...;.'

." Col


, ' '"

! ;--
:,:.'~ ." '.

~,f,}f£yif,tfr---~-"~i~}fl~~~J~:


..:~'>~::'~::,~~~;;~;k··:·lt-: ', -."- ••.• • ~ .•...,._ .• ,0_,'0_•·::';~/~~~.d(~;~~· .'


....•"--;:,. ..,.:.-." .
........... '~" _.: .
", .
--,---.."--------_._-
...•. ..• .. .-.-.,,....• '" ••;.,..,f;';o"
,.'-.: :-/

.. _-~.~~-:-.-.~_._.--.-:.. --.

~.,._:_.~.•.

_-. _.

'.'-,~7_."-: ,.. ,-.__'r-r--. '.__

·-1
:" :

I....
.j
!

I

.(
," ;.
i
• j
':.
\"'~......' r "
i

,~....
.'.'
<.: ." ~.,
9 July 1970 .:.... ..~ .,,," :...:..: :..... ' :$

" .The Di·~~tqr. ~civised the' .DD/I "tha'tWbite House ·~taii~;'~!;~~i~·~~:~

and .Pres:Ldentia.f"COl.;msellor·Pat Moynihan' thought well·,.of·t4e.: ...-.

.. ':

)'

memorandum' on "Black Radi'calisniin the C!3-ribbean~II '

10 July 1970 -.
.;".. ".Mau~i'bl'i~'~e~"'6~"hiS meeti~ yesterday withC6ngreS'sm~n'·Richard.
Ichord"Chairm~nof'.th~. House Internal Secur~tyCommit~ee,.wbo.had

asked woo t' Me are doing"to .investigate "securf,ty Leaks." .connected with press, accounts' of .Lon Nol's having sold rice to the Communists and having engaged in .an attempted deal with Hanoi. Maury briefed on his explanatiop.of .why we are doing nothing, since such reports are not exclusively·,confined. tio..our information.

. ·t·,
A1970
.......
.

1 September
: "';'. -:.,.;.
MaurY:~bted. that the Director sent a letter to'C~ilg:reBs~anMoss on',~tet~p'hone monitoring practice;3•
. .' :';'"

The Director'noted a 1 'Septembermemorandum from'Jphn .Bross on. . Daniel E.ls~rg'·(sic).· He:~sked the. DDS ·to lift his cl~~raiJ.~esand ".to make this';;f'act mown in security channels. <':{}t'..·",· .

15 October 1970 ." ,. "'.. '. :'.'.:.....•:.:i:j;~·"·~:<· ~': ..:'.... '. : ';:~~::~{~~1:i~~;:'· .""-; ~ DDS··reported that·the Weathermen have declared" tn:tsiilonth for their falL;"offe'n:sive and have.'~entionedthe Agency' as;;~at?ta:rg~t .for bombings ·ap.d.·'.kiaD.apping. He briefed on precautio~ri\m:easures adopted'~nq:<aske'q,<senior:officers to :vary their route/,tQ::~nd..from work, 'and .to·:rep.ort· any pecuLiar telephone calls oruriusual"events

.!"
around their residence.
28.Octo~r' '1970' .

·D~P.:::·~~o·~~ed that the


-:-:'.2.

FBI desires to check for'·.ii~~rprints

/' '. . \ r

on all·: ci;'Yptogram messages .mailed to high Goveznmerrt officiaLs. The messa~~6.~11 then be passed to ·NSA for exploita~ip§~1 DDP requested;·:that Agency:personnel 'who receive such messagl?$ pass them to him :.for transmittal to the FBI. . \./.'

·OO~82· . .. ....
~-.:....
c ....
...'. .~
/'....\

I . ':::":;\'.~.;.,,!.i:.~.'.~.:.;.~:...'.~~.:'.:" " , .,/:\" .,:·,:;:~!'~~t~~i-?;::,',


r :
\

.' !

I, .-:::;<;~.}?<>::-" .:.'.:',",':'.:.'" ~,;,":_:~_"~"~'~".".:.:,~,~,:::
...
..,'::.~:,...•...:.•.'...:.
~.::.: .. --. .',


".10 ;De~emb~r·:1970·:.'. ·····;···\:>;i!i;i~:;·:;;/:/:·

.:...: ~ .' ':.. Db±..nbted.·preas accounts Of'~I Direct~rJ,-"E~~g<ko'over ,;'s··· "


19 No~eni~r. statement that th~ Biack.Panthers are·s1ipp~rted:.by':
terrorfst:9rg~nizations. He said. th~t..we have:e~:i,*~d:the" F1;iPs

related"ffles-, and .our own data Q.nCi find no indicatton::;'of',.any. '. relation~h:ip be.tween .the. fedayeen and the Black ·Parithers. ·He provided:..th~ Di'rector"with a memorandum on' this t9pic~.

.'
':Exe.cutive Dire:ctor called attention to the President's .21
December memorandum on "Discloaares of Classified:Information .
~ .
.
an~::q9.'?;t'c;ination
.and.·CleaI/(tce
at·
.
Official " -' ..;,:', ..be1ieve.d· ..:to.be the result of'. represemtations St9.~e~~~~~i-!:\;whichi~
by'.'t;l;i ";; Trector and.:'

A~~ra:W.wA~~erson~.:::.;E?,~.cutive Directo:( said tlia~;T:;"'~\''4,~~km~et~:~i:i;:,-.',seJ.ected::··EXecutive· ..Committee Members next week.:t;. "s'cuss the '..'.'c'..:': memoraridUin's·inlplfea.tions and to- develop'recommen~tions.f6raction . bY:.tb;if~.D:i:~ctorin: :view of' the special :ies:ponsi:bi:ii;Bi~~>placed':on:: '.

'hi1n'?~:~~~~eV:resi~~:nt·
•.'., . . "<';~";;t;t~)~1~~~'?\::':"";' ">:::i::::;'~':',: ,
..
r ", 29 December 1970 ." .... ;. ;::>:"-~,: ,... ~": .
.,. . :~:::.:.-., : '.'"
····ji?x.e·c~ti'Ve Dire~tor reminded Executive committ~E1;~·,participa~ts·. "

. about··::.-t1ie·":in~eting·involving most of them this mor:i:tlng' 'on: the '.

.Prwsident.1sdirective .on disclosure of classified::,:hiformat10n. , "

3o,.~:i~~~·r,. 1970 ..... :'. ,.' '. ..~·):i«t.;.:.::~:. '..•... .'

r"'>:' ":'

:~:~:.Ji~~'~~~ive Director ·briefed·on the re~u1ts'~t~'~st~'rdaY'smeet:irig--;on.":what the.'Direct~r now.needs to do in'.~ur§uab:ce of' the: . ":,


Presidenc,'s: directive .on disclosure of classi:fi~d;:i:iri.form~tion..'.:-.He:~will'

outliri~ 'in the pirector I s brie:fi~ book actions'·-wid.ci:r:iare to' 'be.'-;.. .'. taken.'.'< . .:.

:."
-: . :',.:. : -, ......
,

..' .....

. -.~..'. .....; ....
•..0:

,~
.' .
(.....

00'253'.'

MORl DocID: 1451843

.'.f~~~':;,!"'i.;.': .'

.... .., , ~ ':'~:'.'."'.'

II ,,,.j .

",

..'....

\ ., "~:: :'':1/

':·.(>,:;;;l~;.·~:({:·;· ': .


·;·.:::i4',>January 1971, .
.. '.~~' :;:f:' ~ .. . . . .'

., . Bross said·.that 1;l~.and·Bronson Tweed~r.wii;t},h!i:ve.:lunch today with . . :aen.eral Bennett, Director of' .DIA. The Directoi":said that 'he might ask .: 'Bross to take along a copy of' his letter .and guidance on the Dis'closures ,. ::o£::Caassified 'Information and Coordination and :Ciearance'of Official· ..Statem~nts but :that he firstvdshes to ciarify' with: the Exe.cutive . "Director 'some of the' -Language in the guidance ·section•

.' .:·-.is"Janua'ry 1971.' -,.. ~


,'~'." .

. Maury said.· that he antdcfpatea-a number of' questions from the ..Hill on the .at.tached article by Jack Andersondn today"s,Washington , ..::..Post, "6 Attempts .to Kill Castro Laid to CIA." .

'.'~.:~:~;;;,<:;:::.''~~uSt4~re4tted that 'he .will havel~~~\;~~~;::wit~Assistant


:':.>Attorney 'General Robert C. Marclian to discui;is~~j;ii~>riirector.rs.guide.', :.'(tiJieson the disclosure of' classified inf'omai:lpn. .

".;,:i~:i~i{~;;:::'B'r6ss ·rehted. that Pa;rott met wi~hG~ri~~~:\~~~hnettto re~iew.·.: ..):'¥'€/:',Director'S 'letter on dis'closu~ ?f c~£3~'iti~~.~nf'o:rI+lationand


·:said that. Gene.ral Bennett will now d~scuss '.~t·,:w:J;t.h. Deputy Secretary

. .'J;lackard, who may in turn 'review it with Secre.tary~ird. .The /'" ·.;Directorasked to be·.advisedof' Secretary Pac~rdrs.reactions and. :. ["6~~d:·that he 'wants to -check the. final guidance.:w;ith .Secretary" ..···::Laird and with someone in the" White Housebefore:it is issued.

, .
"i••

·.·...:~ir:f~~;:~:~e.~rua~ .1971 -. : :: .:.~":.~;:;~;}/


.: :,;::.::i:~.:. DD/P C!llled attention to' Jack Andersoni~'~"~o:iUmn'in'today"s
. ",Waspirigton Post , "Castro Stalker Worked For.··.The- .CIA. 1f . •
::: ....:'. :.
;'; ,,:'.:.",. < • '.,'" "

'.": .. ,
.
:
.
, .,'. . ~

. .....'.. ,.~


.....: '>: •.•. . . .

".~ '" ....:
.

.:
..
'
-.
~
:".
..
:."

.," .

~: .
.'
:~..~ " .oo~B4.~

.J~g~;R;91j:}~


f : ,:~:. ~
; ••• ':'
.~...: : •• ';••••::::."':,.....:.,.:..-. • :~,':"~••• #' " ~••
(-- "'y' .,,··:t·july·1971...' ,.. . .

.' ~.....'~...;: :.'.. ..... '. .'. . ,.':;:;!~:~:(':::'" . ..' . '., "'::"::' .'::.; :\'.J;;:;:.::.:.~:.; (,:: .~'Ca.rver noted that SecretarY Lciir4~'tR.'ad·:re.quested:thatour printi.ng;·;>: .' .

..'. :..

·:\.pl~nt .assist"iIl reproducing.the.forty-s·eVb~Y~lUi.nesec~e{Pentagon ~~dy'''<:,

. '. ::.on::Vietnam io'r distribution to the'.'pre.s~·,:aI{a·:~t~rs ~his .m.or!;ling.·, This -. , : . . .)r.equesf:..was aborted by the Prbsident. 7'.: "....." .. ' .·'''''''''lD,.l?C?~~:ht':t1i.e'chair) .


; . ........ "
." .
'. 2 July 1971

.. "':;":' ."I:!D/S said that in the abse~~~,.ofl . :>'~p~
.•... lat~end.eq<

I

.....'arneetingat the White House ye:sterday.ofthe interagency group which is',· reyiewing classdffcarion and decIassffication policy. The President spent' an hour with the group and said that he wants': ••• and (6) the revocation of all cleaz-ance s and the retu·rn. .of all classified rnateri.af held at.Harvard,

·Brookin.gs~·Rand, and Cal Techr : as :well.as ·the'withdrawal of Q'clearances


.:.heldby·the Regents o:f'the U;niversity··o{Ca,lifo·rnia. A brief discussion.. .: . :.··fo~t.ow~d~.?~ni:fthe Exe4=utive Diredoi'·nottid·.that DOD bas asked' us to provide ..inform~tionon all our contracrs With:Rand,'. as well'as allclearances held '.
.' <·by,·Ranq. p~rsonn'elfor our Pu~pos.es.·.·Ading.'Dir~·ctorasked that weasse~ble .:·data.:pe·J:tainmg,to the ~reside~tls:r'~ma.rks,btifi:~twe'tai;te noaction until . : .the President's guidance bas. been confirmed,andthe DDls:ha.s provided a .memoxandum on it.II" ' .. (DDClin the chair)

.: :' '. '.'Carver 'reported that they will;probably complete their detailed reView'. of the secret Pentagon papers by 6 July. II . , . -


. .. ..
:.)"'":"
...'. "'Viari:t~r,:.called attentio~i:6:Seq;¥.'eta:~i·R~gers'·requ~st that the p:res~:

.:··:·,pe·rm.it the.Govermnent to. review i.n~civahcep.otentiallydaInaging documents ;":".£rom,the~entagonpapers." "., -,': :,;.' ..... '.:.....' .... .

. .- . .'''' ". ~ .: '':'.' .. . -. -" .:"
.
'"
6 JUlv 1971

.'.' ... '.'. .ItCa'rve.r said that their re.vi~w:·o~.Jhese~ret Penta on stud 0 .'..... .: .. :.v1.et~a~ has almost been completed•.'.'::', .... g


... :. ~'.," '.. " \.' ':'..
,.....
y. n
00285

." ':~.: ':

~ -. ;"r: :

'I _ .... .t ....... ,"

7 July 1971

" v; .•.......". ~.":.~."' .... ,... .... :'. '.' .,


., .

r, ,JlCarver' said that he will be atte~dingameeting toca.y called by As.sist~nt Secretary of Defense'for Public AffairsDan~erHEmkin. He added that· he' . -, :

',: as surnea it will concern the de~~assi£ic~tiono~ some' of the' secret Pentag6zi. '. '
papez-s andfhat, ifit does, he will seekehe DirectorJs advice•. " (DDCI-'in c.:hai

"At the Executive Director's requ~st, the DD/S.aareed to aet too-ether
, (;> 0 Q

. with the DD/S&T and General Counsel to prepare a briefing paper for 'the ' Director on where we stand with res'p~C~to classified rnatez-ia'Is at Rand
~nd,efforts to' safeguard thezn, Ii " . " ','Maury reported .thatCongresBm~nMahon would like to meet with the" Director on 9 July to discuss t?-e Pentagon papers and various world hot's'Oots Carver said that he will prepar:e a briefing paper fo!:, the Director. on the • Pentagon study. II

.:.)', .
"

;d'··

-tI... .:

.. "Carver briefly notedl . ~oncern ov~J: the

revelations in the Lansdale ~z:n=-=e=m=-=o-=r-=a-=n:-:'d!:'w:n==-.-,~w.:::;hi;-'·;-:,c"h~.-\V-a-s-s-u-r£"'aced·as part of the Pentagonp~pers."

8 July 1971
,
i

..!'


<11 ....: ,}. I''. '. ':1 .. ','

...
.'1, ..
:

J • :

1.IDD/S.reported that a DOD securdtyEearn is goi.n.g to Santa 1vlonica
,to repossess classified De.fense·ni.a~aria:lsheld at Rand,

, , ." ..... _4 __ .'~

, ...'.."..: .. '.
He 'suggested that,
:
..;:.
.,.~..:~. ~

, .rather than take,parallel actfon; .we send ,a' Security Officer to observe

the'opez-attouand inventory Agencyrriatezia'Is inthepossessiori of Rand•

.In response ta the Director's question he expbined that we have seven contracts With Rand; only oneLs .cl.as·si:fied, and it is with Randts Washing-' bon officer although some material could have been sent to Santa Monica•. The Dire.etor concurred and requested a review todeterrntne the essen. tiality of cu'rrent prC;;posed·.contracts w-ith.·Rand. Houston commencedthat; according to Dab General Counsel Buahardt, DOD.~s technically under instructions to lift'the secur;ity clearances of Rand con.tractors but has . taken no action. nDCr repo::-ted'that John E}l.l"lic~":nSE:...heg.J~~~s.~~,P-'.~g

~dviS~_':.~.Jl:;!!..!h2...'tThi!~!!9~,~~__!tL~.P.2..m!}P:gj'R~~~...f1-1:...~m'p',lHY~~-.fi92.~~d a'll,


·Hunt as a securipl cons~~tE':.I!-.t.,.Lat~r·inthe meeting the Director asked

Executive Committee members to review their.lists of consultants to de.

,,:


termine whether each is really needed•. Ii

.,/ "Garver briefed: on his rne'etmg'yesterday with Assistant Secretary .. '.:
/ . '0£Defense for Public .Aifairs Daniel Henkin and noted that any further
. exc~sionsfrom the text of thesecr'et Pentagon'papers :rp.ust be p.rcvided: by,Monday. He added that no. decision.has yet been made on wherher ..1:of..... 'f' release to the. public the volumes .o·r a version fhezeof;;.':' that we should oppose any such course of act'ion, II '. I:.•.

The Director noted
00286
.:-.,:.:~ .... -::':.r: ...

;~~~0m&l~tr~Wji[;;i;lt~;.:.;~J:~g~;~~1~t~~*;:;!;~J",..'",'.......',.,-'


'.. .,..•.
t·•.
'16 July 1971

Ca~~r said that(""'.'Y' ".. )fu~ most,a~:Pre·ciative 0:(the -tim~


.::.. 'which Houston SIlentWJ.thhiril"yesterday•
.':;.

.'~.
,.1"•

...'",
'.
I, .~~I' ••••,:'\.

.~.:
~..
...' '.~
·...
::<br/> 00287:
..
_
....
~..,..--'"~ ~.~
.'.~-: I ..' .
,.,R"~ '0.
.. , '."
. '9 July 1971 .. .f.,,:"
'. ; .,,::~).
f

. l,

I


"In 'respo~se't~'1:h'~:~pi;~ctO~f~'qu~st~o~Carver r~ported'i:li~i~:~one:,:~:(.~·..
I';' ';e;ew xork:!;!:t::~!iZ:&:t ~:~:~e~~~~'7::;::~\1~:~'!'fs~e~'

.. a complete copy ofthe.. :for·ty·~seven volumes .

I I . '.. .

16 July 1971- ,

"Carver reported that the book which General Lansdale has 'been ,-writing for a year and'a,h~ifis now in:-the hands of the publisher. With'some minor changes being made.in light of .reve1ations resulting·from. the publication'of the secret Pentagonpapere, In 'response to· the PD/P' S question Carver said that he mig:Q.t·',be: able·to·ar:l':ang~for ua to read the .f (DDCI in the chair)

..,.,.·
teXt;~!I
.. ';".",
'.'
. ·i·";~/ .'.;:-:'..... .' "\,' .
trTweedy notedth~t:~twiuteHci~se·~e.quest a PFIAB co~itte·e"com:~

posed of Franklin Linc;p~;:d)r. William Baker, aid FrankPa~e wiil'~~:fer"; tak,e·a damage assessni~nt;rifthe publication of'th~ secret Pe~tago.n··~~p~.rs• . He added that the committee will.want to -near from. us and spoke of plaIts

.." ...,._~:.~_..•_..,'-
for Houston and Carver to unde.rtake this .task. II ,

~'.: '".. ."

20 Julv 1971
::
" . ,',';.";

'ITweedy repo;t·~.d}6.~.~.telephone c'~ll'from.'AndYMarshalla~d;1~~Jid.: that Marshall and Ran&.i?~~:side~tHe~ry.,Rowen are brooding ab6ufth~~~::..,:. security pz-obl.em in Rand/;'Marshall expres sed a. des'ir e to talk ·Witl,:(bTfe.. :of our senioi- security.oI£lcers when he next visits Washington~n or9:e£·'t6 Iget. a feel for securitjr':p*a::ctites in'general.' Executive Director.~4Th~:~d

a'gainst our getting out front in. term.s ofadvi.sdng a major DODconf.r;;Lctor

. on security. TheDir~ctorapproved and requested that re zeapond to ¥.r'.

Marshall's request in loVi key and that'the meeting be held.in,thi.,~·'b~i1qing~l\

~. .,..' .... ': '.. . . '.',' ."~: .' .
.'. ": ." .'~' .:' . ......... ' :,:,.,

..
.: ....... .
...
-. :..~
.'.'

.?2 J-u.ly'1971 (the dayHoward Hunt came to see· General Cushman) 1
IIca.r,ve;::...highligh~·f;'d..bi s., s."':3I'dr)P~~eJ:da,.Y_\Yitb..li§..Q s:taiier ':D~:rid . j


.-·...,..Yo-u.ng, ·~~ho is ~ssiatingJo'w}_lfht!J.EJEp~~!-..i~_~Y.i,"~g,J,~~~~:s-:;:.~.t;~~nt:;·gon ./ papers., II
~
..--,.__.._. ... ..

,. ,
: : ' < .
.:,
":
...
"'.:
":.

.:.:;..
.:'
.:
'~;""~M.'~':':~~

i;,.-.. ··
......

',-'-' :

;~:~.;:,.,
;.

"",\"I" ' '«t ','~ ~ , riCarve.:high,l~~hte~his, .Houstou'5,: and 1sesston with. t1i'~~:"'" .
~FIAB cor.r.unlttl\'~:.:~p.i,<;:,h 13, undertaking a damage assessrnent. oithe publfca

,~~;:1'~~th~ ~ec~et.:~;~~~'7go"n,papers.,(See,~~orn~ngMeetingM~ut~~ of,,~6 July
!'"
I6 August 1971

The Directi;):l' cai1ed attention to the article by Michael Getler in todayt s VTashil+gton J:>o~t" "CI:A,patrols'Into China Said Halted, ",and diz-ected (1) that Maury write a letter,io» his sIgna.tur e to Senator Stennis making it clear that Senator Case wasbrfefed ont~s topic and obViously leaked it; (2) that Maury brief Carl March'on the background, including the fact that these opera
tiOU$ were not termmatedbecause of the Pz-esidentrs projected trip. to Com:munist China butl;>ecau's~,certainaspects of the:m were preV:iously exposed in the press; ,(3) that theD,ll.·ector';of Security (who was present at the Morning Meeting) get additional backgr-ound from Maury and see White House staffer' David Young;(4},thatGo~dWiil.,rep1yto'queries by saying that we know nothing about ,this ~atter; (5):,th~t,,~ousto,riand Maury utilize this incident in any
rnat.erfal prepaz-ed for his' use in,opposing the Cooper biil; and (6) that the ODeI brief Dz, Kis sirigex or .Genera.I Haig on this :matter today.

-.
'''--''-.'' ...." .....
.::* 13 Augus,t,'1971

:<' '.,

, Knbch'e'cail¢datteriti.6n:to the .artiCle by Tad Szul~,in.todayts New York Times, "Soviet Mqy-e,:t6,Ayert ,WarIs Seen in Pact with India, II and'said that the material contained'therein' on the reason for Foreign-Minister Gr.omyko's visit to New Delhi is ,cleariy,froIn highly c1as'suiedCS'materia1. 'TheA-DDP noted.hi's concern ove.r this breach of security.

16 'August 1971..; .
'A-DDPn~t~lthit"~hearticl~b
"AttemptedPr6-'SoVi~tCoup in yY

T ' " '. . . . ' ' ,
,ad SzulcInSundayrs'~~ Times, from a TDCS. Th~:Diredo k e;en 18 Reported, " contains information ',
~o~se stafi~r~a-rid~oung•.r as, e that he call this to the"attention of vVmte ,

.: ." "0
i!
-1

, \

!
t
.....,
,
00289"
i.:.:' ." ,,
....,'.

··1


<

18 August 197'~ -: ,~.:',: .:..<:;. r "

A-DDP riot~d that. he has reported to 'l,v-hiteHou~e:sta£f;;~ b:~vici'YounO't


. \'on the re-:>ults,().£th~,Deputy'Directorof Security's'survey of'~lio-s'~,~,W};osaw' the classified, assesament upon which Tad Szu.Ic, based ,h\s'13;::i\b.g~i#:,:article.

(~ee Morning Meetbi.g Minutes of I? August 1971}.· ** ,'::."((;:::;:i:' .::. "

~,~; ..: '.:~: ",' .
" '." r-..
19 AUQ;us't 1971,'

L


. ~,

\


'IIMaury hriefed Qn,.vynite House s~ai:fer Jo1:'.:1 Leh..-na~'s::~equ'est'fo::' ~~r

d" t .. a"W'on'at four volumes of the secret.Pentagcn paper",
'. ' '.
aSslstance ln e errrllnmo , ,,' ° •
' . G
1'" t dly provided to Beacon Press, for pu,bhc,atloSenator' rave ,repor.e, , ' " ,

noted

ll· He b.ethatP~u1Chretien pf'o.TR,is an acquamtance ()~'t4:,'S.en.at~r~n~n:~yable to assist. "Carver said that the four v'oluro.es probao~'ypertal:" to e1!or~~to ne otiate a sett,lement and outlined the sensit~ve~aten:l'contaln,e~ther~ln.

Hous;on re,"ommended against our involvement ln, th7.: rn.at..e~,a~d su:gested that the D', tm nt of Justice query Beacon PresS• .',Ma:ury sa:~d that.Fhe ,epar e ~ , 'It' "'th Clar.k

D.
~rec
;""l'ni:itructed that we dc),nothing unti11Jlaury c.(;m~,u ,5~'t
0 .... ,-, ' dC' ionalM O"e;or' CoU:nsel,to' the, Presi.dent for.'

Legislat1ve"a~,' ongr-es s, ::teo '

In the ~'~ariti:m:e" :Mau'ry noted
~,c, h". ,,' 't £ town'and will not return until the first;9f next week.Affalrs W 0,15 OU 0 tp.at hl:: willdete~ine,..f.ro,m, !ohn..Lehma~.,n
whother,'th~yhave considered consulting the Depa:r,tment of JU5tl:e °h ~!l!.hs. )
-, '0 ," ." , ',', ' ,', ,(DDCr l.n t e c alrrnatter••.
..'..
20 'Augusi:'1971,
':'. 4.' "

",rM:aury safd that he called '\V4ite Hous e stafI~'r ,J000 Lehman yesterday and cite4:;~ih'~.Code:whichwould' pezmit the Justice"D~p'~:r:tnlent:i:ogo 9-fter' the four' vohlines':,?£,the,sEicr~t,Pentag6npapers report~'d{y:'gi:v~n:~oB'eaconPress; Lehman"s',reaction .wa's .that, since there is an,exi.stingpoiiCy',preventing the use ofsu~po~nasonthis matter, he'stiU hopes we wntass,ist ,{n'det'erm.ining 'what Senato:r Gra:\reI may have given. BeaconPress~:":Th-e,DDC(a5kedMaury not to ut~lize,'Paul:Chretien's entree 'to the Senator~th.outprior consultation With the Director, and Carver commented that he is' opposed to our'involve" ment (see:M~rning,MeetingMinutes of'19 August 1971. it '" (DDCr in'the chair)

"
'

...~;)~<

'::' .'
23 Aug'.l,st'1971 ,
" ' t:TiwDirector reviewed ior Houston a conversation he had with a' ,
<o,uug la~\~'Y:er who has reviewed the secret Penta,go,r(,pap'ers'-in'response to'
,..-_tIle Jl~stlce Department's efforts to pzosecute, Ace'ordina :to' thi'·satt'<:a..
J ....
did '.'0, orney,
. us..rce ,,1.. ~ot cibe the: approprlate proVJ.sions of the Code audhaa zesented
lots case poorly./-I ,p
~:

".:-.,;;: 00280'

r

,:"

,. ..~. . .' ..... '
-.~ :,;~:, I"~

l:~~=,::thatthi.i."~aaY;.inthe~lti'~itand'_",i,.,


Apparently Out in Powe·r·,shuffle" by Stanley KB.rn9i,1}'."Nqrth·Vi'etnam's· Next MO~e" 'by Evans/Nova,k,' and "lin Piao 'is iFinisli~41.':'1,JYJoseph Alsop (attached}. He noted 'that,while the artic:i.e:J~y':Stanley . Karnowprovides good coverage of the topic, it· has :'8, 'State. Depar-tment; flavor. He also recalle'a that on 25 October we'dis'seminated
in~ormation simiJ..8.r to that corrtadned in 'the EVel!lf!/}lo:va~.article •

·He.·tnentioned that .the Alsop .article is ·probably.the m:ost damagin'g,

since' it inciudEii!3.,materiall . ...... '"

IThe..Director noted..:p;JJ.:l.~,s,.to. dot ,S.omething
La--'b·o"""u-:t·.-.t"h--'i'-:s::--C::pC::-r:-::o'i:b""l-=-e:-m~:b=u:Lt-a=-d3':v~ised the A-DDP to.cope ':With any adverse..

..re~ctionT -. fbY'noting ~he la:ge··~~()~~e.:01'.repor;tsonithe·pol1tica:I",situation in Commum.st· ChJ.na~:·,::·· ';'.: ..... --::..",


. ."
11 _,November 1971

. .

±~, .response ·to the. Director's .question .ca;;~·~::~~~d'.~hat~some work

. requested.by ·.John 'Ehrlichman is pending. The Director asked to be .'·filled in later.on the detai1:s.. '.~ " ..::'. . '. : .. .


. ;.'
... '.. 'Lehman .said. tha;t Jack"Anderson' s column inj;o~y'sWashiDgton
:. ~pa:t;::-J!Hu·sse:l;tl.:·.;:I:S;elp .. or I'll Go on' a:'Ghazol1.~~~;~~LcC!ri:tairis. ver'bS;tiin .. .')~il.guag~. '!'rom),Ul:':ExDis message 1'rom'King'H}ui,~,¢;p.ij~~cf:the.·,~s'fdent·· ,
·.and adq.edthat.: he d.s 'looking into the' distri:Du'tiori Qt'. this message • . '~ '. ~.' ':" .', ~ ".- ,'" '.. '<':.: '.-.

. .~.
,'.;

. .... . ., ::\ .. . . A-DDI ca].led attention to Jack Anderson's columns .inyesterday's 'and today's Washington Post (attached). Henqted .th~t the 27 December .piec~ .contained material frc:lIll.three SALT ExDis. .memcons and added

·.tliat·toaay's column contains quotes from a state.:Ltiillis. eabf,e and

:\~:~Q::'~CSS. 'A bde1'.:'discussion 1'ollowed, ..th,~>P.R;;'[()bs.erving that, .' . .;.:. if·'.these security.breaches continue, we wil~·:li~ve·.t·o· limit severely '" ·the·.distribution of sensitive .intelligenceinformat1on.

• ': .' , • : • '~~.:..:: t' • •

.. :',:'.,.;''.,~ -':'...'.

,.',', .' .....

..'
,.~
?ct":#'., • • ' ,',
~.,,...
.

0029.1.

.MORI DocID: 1451843
..:.__ 1
. !
;
.......t••'··"'
'1

. .

: ".
·'i,.· ';(.

',' .l. : -,'.' .

<.:!" ..'.""~i" January -1972.


.", ; 1:

.....::::.:..Maury said that "acc::ording to Frank Slatin;she·k,.·Cha'~piJan . . ':Nedzi'will rely on' us ratb.e;r::heavily forsuPPol;t· dur.ing his.hearings

'. on

the problen"t.of classification and handling:'.of.Governtnent·.· .

. "'1rifprmation (see Morning Meeting Minutes of 6' January .1972). . The . Director encouraged Maury to ,see Chad.rman Ned·z.i next.:week, and ." nouston suggasted that. the Chaiman be provided with ·the Rehnquist .study.

': DDP briefed on .work under,~y to limit··distribution of. reports
~and\noted that· C/FI ·is completing a review of
---=s""'t-=-e=p-=-s-w"""hL:J.""'·c="h=-=m...-:li""'g=Ulfi=t:--t::Q=e--=t/iken to restrict disseminationof sensitive reports from ·all·sources.

,

..' .....·.Ll..January .1972

,,:,: . Maury:~'lated' that Frank: SlatinsheK'ii;;;~~'~Singfor.'';~Ckground

. '..;:·materials pertaining to Pas:t efforts or.·studies·: related'to :the classification and control of informatipn~.:{',1Ieadded that he and .>, !':'HoU!:Jton will meet with' the .Director later'~¥aY ·t9 discu~B the ,.''.' availability ·of .the Rehnquist. study.!' '. '

i2.January i972...::', ;:.

":. r:';...:-.: '....." Mat:t!y)tBriefed: onhis·anf!. Houstontssession with Frank ' .

. ' ' :.:". SJ.atinshek and their provision of a. large ,volimJe of material on
. '... .. past eiforts tq develop ei'fec-cive
,0.
'.' '.

• ',"0)",-';;"-;"','

espiona:g~·:!(·laws.'"

., ,.:: '.>'.

Hou~to~ ri6ted' the Pre'sident t~ nOnii~~ig~,':'~f HenrY E~. ".Peterse~

..... : : ·tobeceme Assistant Attorney' General in ;:Chlirg~·,o.f.,the diminal .. _ .'Division ot the Justice' ·Department. He ol)se'rved ,that ·Mr•. Petersen
:.:.......':has 'been,m-os~ helpful to the Agency in:the",:~~t~:,~r.ticu;I.arly, . on: the Itkin case. .

13 January .L972 .

., , :'. Maury.n~ted ·.that the draftrevision,'bi 'Executive .Order 10501, ,: ...: ."Security.Classification Procedures," .whicp.::'iB 'be,ing circulated '. '. by the .NSD staff fot comment, isa follow:on to the Rehnquist study•

.::00

'. .: ·DDI calied'attention to the article: intOday's NewYO~k:.Times, .. -."Nixon 'Acts to End' Security Leaks." (Excerpt: "last ·July,.. two " '. 'members of the White Rouse 'staff, ·DavidR. Young of the Ne:t~ona.i " . . ~ .8ecurity councr), and Egi.l Krogh Jr. of the. ;J;)omestic Council" were /., " asked to investigate 'earlier leaks and prevent recurrences.") .

,.~·I~ . '. ..
O.o.29~

I>·......; ".!


/!~. ' '.,~:" ~:"'~'., . ' "'. . -~ ,, "
, ":"

.
.;.':'
.: ::'~.'
.... "
~.. _
·1,February 1972..;" ." :>-.... '
...;A/DpS reported "the Rouse;Appropriatio~s COl!JIll±ttee "re~uest :for "
a finance of'fi·cer ~oa.ssist them in }lork':."0Il: .tne budget, '''-'~~ added "
that we have provided such assistancein·tlie pastl and the Director
interposed no objec:tion. . .
7 February 1972

.' . "H9ustonexplained that no actzton wi~1 be taken in the near future with "respect to 'the Rans Tofte"case I" since the Judge! has been 'stricken with hepatitis.

tl February 1972

DDI noted the article by Michaei·:·.c¥:t~erin 'Today'S Washington
Pos~.;."New Spy Satellites _ Plan.ned.:;:idr'C1ea"rerl" :rnstluit Pi~tures." Later 'inthe meeting the Director. asked: the DDS to advf.se the

,.' Director of Security to undertake an·~nvestigationat this leak of

•'
:;.,' 'EOI-related information "and to convenerthe USIB"Security Committee •
'.::'. • ". ' .• ';->, -.':' ....

. ',' : 11 February 1972
Carve.r -noted his hand.Hng of Wbii;e"' H9use staffer Sven Kraemer I s
, " zequesf to' .FBIS f'or material cQncerriing;""U~S. FOW's.". The Director..' reminded Executive Committee members of'"Dr. Kissinger's :reCJ.uest that any inquiries. from elements"of'the Wbiteo House staff. be re:ferred to his staf'f' for conveyance to :the Agen:~y~ "

. :..,.. . ., ,,'


" ,., Houstonhigbl:ightecithe:meetirig.~i~.JOhn Ehrlicbman on the NSC

.. '. : "draf't Exec~tiveOrderon security Classifi~tion" "He" noted the _'related articLe by Sanford Ungar in today'sWashington Post, "liSe" ." Urges: St;tff'er. raw On Secrets.". ".. ."

16 February 1972

. '.. Lehman noted plans to continue'briefing Attorney 'General
'.".: ", '. ' Mitchell, .whose resignation is :e:t:fective 1 :March". :" . .

..

',': Houston related that Wbite:Hou:~e'~taffer David Young has invited him to review another~ draft of the 'new Executive Order on security classification.::.. .

" .. . ,.
,. .

r.


" .
.'
......,,' .~

.. "t"."·

~. ..~.. ." ..: .. ..
... -A: .

.,:. ./
..::'.
".:.
:.,

.. 2e February 1972 ". :i,:·;:,:::,: :

. ~o~ston. SS:i'd th,~t he.andJ .:,;::.'.,::.... , IDePuty Director ?:f Security, recommend the DJ.rec-f;or;concur ·.J.n·.the Mnew ExecutJ.ye Order on classification, in light"pt tbeir under'\and:Lng with NSC staffer David Young, that some of the ':features df the' Executive Order may not materialize. Abri~fdiseussion followed and th~ Director asked lIouston to 'review the matter with him.

.
....j

d
:: .'

;~ 2~rch 1972 Houston reported that the draft Executive Order on classif'ication has undergone a few minor changes•..~e noted Director's letter to John Ehrlichman, dated 7 December '-19.71," wit~ respect .to our position on problems related·to declassifica'tfon:and, suggested that a .copy be provided David Young, NSC stiffier~';.After a brief discuss1:0n, the D:l,rector Lrrterposed no objection~:< .


." ,
b March. 1972. : ~
.:.. '.
.,.."

The Director noted his memorandum fo ·the Deputies' and Independent Office Heads, subject: "Allegations:of·Assassinat.ions." He asked that it be mentioned at. Staff'. Meetings. . .

". :
" '!

~.,
'; ~ ;" .:.
.: ":.

.:):~:{~<:

-"':'~":':' ..
21 March 1972

. '. The J)irector said tha:t.:tb~",~s.identhe-so seen his 17 February memorandum on reducing:disclos:\.tresv.of:classified 'intelligence and directed the White -House staff to pre~re.a memorandum urging ·that all agencies comply with pr<;>per'di·sclosl1re·.procedures.

22' March' 1972

Houston reported that he fS·.scheduled to meet with John Ehrlichman this morrdng•

23 March 1972

Maury reported that, after' checking with 'Egil Krogh of the Whi.te House staff, he has .nia.~earrarig;ementsto brief Congressman
Le~r Wolff' of New York on·tbe:·AgenGY's role in international. ' narcotics control. .,: ... '. ..'

.
(:
..........:,...
~.
00294'
"

...•. ~.. .. ' '?

,; .'

!.
t.. .:
!
!
,
i
!
0.;'
."
1 May 1972 ':..::,.y

"~'DDS 'related thatt~e~i::~;~;o~':'~:~ti~ityhas received a requ~st···· ..':


from the·.Becret Service 'tC).provide .two .technicians Ln .supportof . ...... -. the Vice'President's trip to ::TokYo. The Director concilrred.

2 May 1972.

DDS reported that the..Director .01' 'Security has received a request' from the .Becreb Service fPr'c,otinteraudiotechnicians to support the President's trip to Mos"cd>W:The Director concurred, .

11 May 1972

Houston noted his.~orre~ponderic~··With White House.'staffer David Young' pertaining' t.o,:'::·.C>jJ'r.propleJ;lls.:With Executive "brder li652 and addedvthat; Mr. YOllDg',:lias.accepted :bUI- position on about 90 percent of our problems :w1:tp· the. ·impleme:q.ting draft·directive.

" :
2LJ. May 1972." ... ....

. Houston explained that'he bad obtain,ed vlhite House.Staffer .' .. David Young'·sunderstanding tbat'wewi;Ll not meet the l.:rune deadlio,.e/' for producing internal Ag$ncy regulations .implementing the NSC' .. '.. directove on Executive .:Orq.er:11652.'.A~brie1' discussi(>ll.foliowed onr ': the cumbersome bookkeeping, and 'declassif'ica·tion a'uthbrities which· . may be required. The Director obserVed ·that the topic: was 6uff'icien.tly.i~portant.for.~..uq:;:t.o,be in .no great rush,to meet a 1: June 'deadline and Houstb#::~ssui'ed hfm thai; Mr. 'Yo:ung understands.:::'.

b June 1972

TllUermer explained..,thafhe.will continue._working with the" ..~ . -"r •..... ..General Counsel in response to Charles Nes'son' s efforts to serve a subpoena on him in connectaon with tbe Ellsberg case. He noted the related article by Rober;t.,A. Wright .Ln tqday's "Hearing Is Asked In Eli'sperg Case.It .

'. ~~i~1~tI'~'~::::'

.' ;": .:

New XorkTimes,
.
7 June 1972 . .

'.'.

. Houston noted a.:let~r.from the Just:tc~ Depar-tment; conveying a.. , subpoena dire.cted to ·Ariiu.s: Thuermer .iIi connection ·with the Ellsbe:rg'::;:·::'·:·-·: case•. He highlighted tbe'~schedule of documents .requested, most, of ':":::'" which' were mentionediIi'·,:footilOteS·.to the Pentagon papers. He ncted :...'; . .'plans to ask Justice to :decJ.B.re the materia~ i,rrelevant to the ease;;:'.',; .

".- .' ..':'}.-...~:
; ••0
,',,, ."
MJune 1972-,..i".·: r;

. Houston said tha~h~,1ri.ll,~~attending a meeting called 'by~' DOD General Counsel 'Buzl1ardt;"wlib"'ls recommending ~ba~ Justice drop,' . the' case against Daniel ·.E·llsberg.

19 June 1972
<. ~....

The Director noted ·the -17 June arrest of James W. McCord and four others who' were apprehended at the Democratic National Committee', headquarters at the Watergate~. With·,the Director .of Security presEint to prOVide biographic details,· the Director made it perfectly clear that responses to any inquiry with respect to. McCord or Howard Hunt, who may be implicated, ~re to.be limited to a statemen~ that they. are fomer employees:who.retired in.MMill1 August and~il 1970 .:.... :.: ,:.,

respectively. The. Director asked·:th.at this guidance,

be

dissemiDEl'ted

via ·sta.ff meetings"·'~:'·:a;'l:ie.Directorasked that any inquiry from other·.:.:;": eLementis of" the gov~~E;nt"be ref'erred.to the Director of' Security::'" who is to be the f'ocal.·point. InquirieE? f'rom the press are. to be'; •. ref'erred to Mr., Unumb)Who"may say that·"McCoxd worked in the Of'f'i.ce~.\,··',::·,

~~:e~~~~~tt~:nD~~~:~~g~~~~~:~~:piet~a~::s~~:~~~:i~~l~~r:~.L};':\\';\:·.'.

EM FBrrs request f'or name .traces. It.vias' noted that Howard' Hurrt. ;.. ' . may have done some "\fork since retire~eJ;ltin connection with the'. ... ! preparation of' supporting-,material f'or'some awards. The' Executive ..."" \. Direct"or was asked·'··~9 ,review this topic 'and .repo.rt to the Director'~ '."

.....20 June 1972,
.'ii~:·.:.~:.~:. . ..".~... ~~-~.; .~'." :

In response to·.;:the·Director's. request, the Director of' Security.· highlighted deveLopmentis over the .past twenty-f'our. hours .with '. . respect to 'the McCord/Hunt·, et ale, situation. He noted that the·,,:-... late edition of'· the ;Ne'W'"Yqrk. Times-car;ries a dif'f'erent story. by. Ta(i': -.:··~: .

. Szulc than that wh~ch~ppe,aredin the edi.tion received here1~ .:' .:" .,_. (attached). The Director ·of. Security anticipates some inquiries on···.'·

Bernard L. Barker's. situation, and it was noted that Mr. Barker. . was hired ·by ther Agency in 1960 andteminated in 1966. The .DirE~c'l,;oi·· / complimented Unumb on':'his handling of' incil1iries and asked that.:f\iture . inquiries be met::w:Lth.;a.response confined to the f'act that,now::·,t~at. we have acknowledged that.bo'th 'McCord and Hunt are fOrnier Agency.'. . ., employees, we know" n,otid.ng more ().bout the case and the caller 'shouldI be referred to the~:FBI-.as appropriate.

. . ". .

"' .. '.'.

.'

.. ::'.

;~ :, .'

mr
20 June 1972

The Dir~:cj;q;r'noted :recei,pt. of a. papar on a safehouse in· :.:, Miami which isoeing made avad.Lab.le to the Secret Service :tn'.support of its work in connection with the Republican and Democratic' National Conventions. absolu.tely .cl;~~r.1 He asked the ADDP and the DDS to make.i t . I.that ou: coopezatd.on in ~~i~:;:_J"-'' .. undertakingis..::~.o beconf~ned to. provfsf.on of the sa:ee40u~~:r~.~n~·:,· ~

·that it. is not:·;to.1?e.used as a site for investigati